Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attachment style and prolonged singlehood in the ultra-Orthodox community in Israel

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between attachment style and prolonged singlehood in the ultra-Orthodox community in Israel. As in many religious and collectivistic communities, great value is attached to the institution of marriage while singlehood is perceived as an unwanted phenomenon and inflicts suffering on ultra-Orthodox singles and on their families. Two hundred and fifty-nine singles, women and men, who define themselves as ultra-Orthodox responded to an online questionnaire about “Experiences in Close Relationships” and a personal details questionnaire. The dependent variable of the singlehood period was defined by three values: (1) “number of years of singlehood” (N = 259), (2) “number of years of dating” (N = 249), and (3) “number of partners dated” (N = 239). The end of the singlehood period by marriage was defined functionally as the engagement of the participant. Data was subjected to a Cox proportional hazards survival analysis. Results generally showed that avoidant and anxious attachment styles were negatively correlated with the odds of getting married. Results are discussed in the context of attachment theory and the capability of compromising during the process of match-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamczyk, K., & Bookwala, J. (2013). Adult attachment and single vs. partnered relationship status in Polish university students. Psihologijske teme, 22(3), 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M. (1991). Attachment and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In C. M. Parkes, J. Stevenson-Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 33–51). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355(198021)1:1<68::aid-imhj2280010110>3.0.co;2-3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Band-Winterstein, T., & Tuito, I. (2018). The meaning of choosing a spouse among ultra-orthodox Jewish women who found themselves in a violent relationship. Violence Against Women, 24(6), 727–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217722236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S. Z. (2013). “The art of the Deal”: Preferences in spouse selection among parents in a Hasidic community. Israel Studies Review, 28(2), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.3167/isr.2013.280205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J. (2003). Being “single and unattached”: The role of adult attachment styles 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(8), 1564–1570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01963.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/2798963.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss. Volume 2: Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/583128.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment Theory and Close Relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-6513.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J., & Kobak, R. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relation to other defensive processes. Clinical Implications of Attachment, 1, 300–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, K. D., & Davis, K. E. (1998). Attachment, partner choice, and perception of romantic partners: An experimental test of the attachment-security hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 5(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00175.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collet, D. 1994. Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

  • Collins, W. A. (2003). More than myth: The developmental significance of romantic relationships during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1532-7795.1301001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R., & Oakes, D. (1984). Analysis of survival data (Vol. 21). London: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic perspectives on gender and the cultural context of love and intimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb01168.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelberg, A. (2016). Religious Zionist singles: Caught between “family values” and “young adulthood”. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(2), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., Wu, T. F., & Wei, M. (2013). Attachment and the investment model: Predictors of relationship commitment, maintenance, and persistence. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01423.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., & Noller, P. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1991). The Haredi (ultra-orthodox) society: Sources, trends and processes. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1995). Life tradition and book tradition in the development of ultraorthodox Judaism. In H. E. Goldberg (Ed.), Judaism viewed from within and from without: Anthropological studies (pp. 235–255). New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1999). Chol cvoda bat melech hutza: Haisha haharedit [all glorious is the princess out of her chamber: The ultra-orthodox woman]. In M. Leibovich & Y. Mazor (Eds.), Baruch sheasani isha? Haisha bayahadut mehatanach vead yameinu [blessed he that made me a woman? The woman in Judaism from the bible to our time] (pp. 189–206). Tel Aviv: Miscal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2006). “Shtikot” ve “amirot” bahevra haharedit [“Silences” and “sayings” in ultra-Orthodox society]. In: Hertzog, H., & Lahad, C. (eds). Yodim veshotkim mangenoney hashtaka vehachash bahevra haIsreelit [They know and remain silent about mechanisms of silencing and of denying in the Israeli society]. Jerusalem: Hakibitz Hameuchad.

  • Furman, W., & Shaffer, L. (2003). The role of romantic relationships in adolescent development. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 3–22). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, R. (2014). Haharedim bahevra haisreelit: Tmunat matzav, 2014 [the ultra-orthodox in Israeli society: An update, 2014]. Haifa: Technion.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Adult attachment interview protocol. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Goodman, Y. (1997). Galut haceilim hashvurim: Havnayat hametziut vehasiach hatipuli bemisgarot tipul harediot beIsrael [the exile of the broken tools: The construction of reality and of therapeutic discourse in therapeutic ultra-orthodox settings in Israel]. Ph.D. dissertation, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.

  • Goshen-Gottstein, E. R. (1984). Growing up in "Geula": Socialization and family living in an ultra-orthodox Jewish subculture. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 21(1), 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabill, C. M., & Kerns, K. A. (2000). Attachment style and intimacy in friendship. Personal Relationships, 7(4), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00022.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D., Buchbinder, J. T., & Witztum, E. (2012). Arranged matches and mental illness: Therapists' dilemmas. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 75(4), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2012.75.4.342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, A. (2001). Pious and rebellious: Jewish women in Europe in the middle ages. Jerusalem: The Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History (in Hebrew). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0038713400016092.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gurovich, N., & Cohen-Kastro, E. (2004). Ultra-orthodox Jews: Geographic distribution and demographic, social and economic characteristics of the ultra-orthodox Jewish population in Israel, 1996–2001. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadden, B. W., Smith, C. V., & Webster, G. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality: Meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. E. (2000). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 71(3), 690–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153683-17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, S. C. (1992). Defenders of the Faith: Inside Ultra-Orthodox Jewry. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2074600.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, S. C., & Friedman, M. (1991). Religious fundamentalism and religious Jews: The case of the Haredim. Fundamentalisms Observed, 1, 197–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, S. C., & Witztum, E. (1997). Value-sensitive therapy: Learning from ultra-orthodox patients. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51(4), 522–541. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1997.51.4.522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Himawan, K. K., Bambling, M., & Edirippulige, S. (2017). Modernization and singlehood in Indonesia: Psychological and social impacts. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences.

  • Joel, S., MacDonald, G., & Shimotomai, A. (2011). Conflicting pressures on romantic relationship commitment for anxiously attached individuals. Journal of Personality, 79(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00680.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, K. (2007). Besod hasiach haharedi [in the secret of the ultra-orthodox discourse]. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for the History of Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships: A four-year prospective study. Personal Relationships, 1(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00058.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latty-Mann, H., & Davis, K. E. (1996). Attachment theory and partner choice: Preference and actuality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407596131001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. (2009). Hamigzar haharedi beIsrael: Haatzama toch shiluv betaasuka [the ultra-orthodox sector in Israel: Empowerment through integration in employment]. Jerusalem: The National Council for Economics at the Prime Minister’s Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, D. J. (2011). The relationship between well-being and the pressure to date and marry among modern orthodox Jews. Ph.D. dissertation, Hofstra University, New York.

  • Mesman, J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwarz, A. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852–877). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M. (1995). Attachment style and the mental representation of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1203–1215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Erev, I. (1991). Attachment style and the structure of romantic love. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30(4), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00946.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 53–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(03)01002-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment bases of psychopathology. In Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (pp. 369–405).

  • Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (2000). Exploring individual differences in reaction to mortality salience. Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 260–273.

  • Milevsky, A., Niman, D. S., Raab, A., & Gross, R. (2011). A phenomenological examination of dating attitudes in ultra-orthodox Jewish emerging adult women. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 14(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670903585105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penkower, A. Y. (2010). The culture of dating and single life in the modern orthodox Jewish community: A qualitative study. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.

  • Petrowski, K., Schurig, S., Schmutzer, G., Brähler, E., & Stöbel-Richter, Y. (2015). Is it attachment style or socio-demography: Singlehood in a representative sample. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, A. M., & Giufre, A. (2014). Should'a put a ring on it: Investigating adult attachment, relationship status, anxiety, mindfulness, and resilience in romantic relationships. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(11), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2014.211005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pistole, M. C., Clark, E. M., & Tubbs, A. L. (1995). Love relationships: Attachment style and the investment model. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 17(2), 199–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prainsack, B., & Sigal, G. (2010). Genetic testing and screening in religious groups: Perspectives of Jewish Haredi communities. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & Y. S. Carmeli (Eds.), Kin, gene, community: Reproductive technologies among Jewish Israelis (pp. 153–171). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want? Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockman, H. (1994). Matchmaker matchmaker make me a match: The art and conventions of Jewish arranged marriages. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 9(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674659408409593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachner, D. A., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Attachment style and long-term singlehood. Personal Relationships, 15(4), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00211.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler, I., Fagundes, C. P., & Murdock, K. W. (2010). Predictors of romantic relationship formation: Attachment style, prior relationships, and dating goals. Personal Relationships, 17(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01255.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senchak, M., & Leonard, K. E. (1992). Attachment styles and marital adjustment among newlywed couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592091003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., & Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the “big five” personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, P. R., & Hazan, C. (1993). Adult romantic attachment: Theory and evidence. Advances in Personal Relationships, 4, 29–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechory Bitton, M. (2014). PTSD, posttraumatic growth, and coping among ultra-Orthodox Jewish battered women in Israel. Journal of Loss & Trauma: International Perspectives on Stress & Coping, 19, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2012.760383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh, M. (2001). Nesicha o shvuya? Hachavya hanashit shel hayishuv hayashan beYerushalaim 1840–1914 [princess or captive? The female experience of the old settlement in Jerusalem 1840–1914]. Haifa: University of Haifa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (1994). Stress and secure base relationships in adulthood. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 181–204). London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sroufe, L. A., & Waters, E. (1997). Attachment as an organizational contrast. Child Development, 48, 1184–1199. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153683-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolmacz, R. (2004). Attachment style and willingness to compromise when choosing a mate. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504041387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uecker, J. E., & Stokes, C. E. (2008). Early marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(4), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00530.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasserman, N. (2011). Hevrat hakdusha: Tahalich hakamat habait bhasidut Goor [society of holiness: The process of establishing the house at the Goor piety]. Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

  • Zalcberg, S. (2012). Gender differences in the involvement of young people in the matchmaking process in an extreme ultra-orthodox community. Journal of Jewish Identities, 5(2), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/jji.2012.0023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalcberg, S. (2014). Shiduchin vegenetika: Al bdikot genetyot trom-shiduchiyot bahevra haharedit [matchmaking and genetics: On genetic examinations before matchmaking in the ultra-orthodox society]. Hahevra haharedit, 2, 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zicherman, H. (2014). Shachor cahol-lavan: Masa el toch hahevra haharedit beIsrael [black blue-white: A journey into the ultra-orthodox society in Israel]. Tel Aviv: Miscal.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, 14 Rabenu Yeruham st., Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, Israel

    Avraham Yacovson, Eran Shadach & Sigal Levy

Authors
  1. Avraham Yacovson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eran Shadach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sigal Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eran Shadach.

Ethics declarations

As the corresponding author, I confirm that all procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Departmental Research Ethics Committee of the School of Behavioral Sciences at the Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo.

Conflict of Interest

As the corresponding author I confirm that none of the authors of this paper has any relationships or interests that could have direct, have potential influence, or impart bias on this work. None of the authors is aware of any real or perceived conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yacovson, A., Shadach, E. & Levy, S. Attachment style and prolonged singlehood in the ultra-Orthodox community in Israel. Curr Psychol 41, 1311–1322 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00654-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00654-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation