Abstract
In economic games, people acting as responders always hope to be treated fairly; otherwise they may punish proposers even sacrificing own monetary gains. However, people often treat others unequally when they become proposers, especially in the absence of punishment mechanisms. Will people lose fairness perception when they become proposers? Previous researches mainly focused on the fairness perception of responders, few paid attentions to that of proposers. In present study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to record the neural activities of participants acting as proposers in the ultimatum game and the dictator game, corresponding to punishment condition and non-punishment condition respectively. In each trial, a participant could choose an offer from three categories: absolutely unfair, relatively unfair and fair. Behavioral results indicate that the proposers would choose more highly unfair offers that are beneficial to themselves in a non-punishment condition than in a punishment condition. However, no matter whether there was punishment mechanism, more highly unfair offers elicited larger MFN. This finding may reflect the existence of the proposers’ unfairness aversion and guilty feeling triggered by intentional violations of social fairness norm and shows that the proposers do not give up the fairness norm in the cockles of the heart even in a non-punishment environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133.
Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2003). Giving according to GARP: An experimental study of rationality and altruism. Econometrica, 70(2), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.115.2.243.
Bechler, C., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2015). Proportion offered in the dictator and ultimatum games decreases with amount and social distance. Behavioural Processes, 115, 149–155.
Boksem, M. A. S., & De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 5(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910903202666.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. The American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166.
Bolton, G. E., & Zwick, R. (1995). Anonymity versus punishment in ultimatum bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1026.
Brenner, T., & Vriend, N. J. (2003). On the behavior of proposers in ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(4), 617–631. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.456980.
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Strategizing in the brain. Science, 300(5626), 1673–1675. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086215.
Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.209.
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2000). What's in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1), 29–35.
Civai, C., Miniussi, C., & Rumiati, R. I. (2015). Medial prefrontal cortex reacts to unfairness if this damages the self: A tDCS study. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 10(8), 1054–1060. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu154.
Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., Mcelreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446(7137), 794–796. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05651.
De Waal, F. B. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625.
Declerck, C. H., Kiyonari, T., & Boone, C. (2009). Why do responders reject unequal offers in the ultimatum game? An experimental study on the role of perceiving interdependence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.03.002.
Emmons, R. A., & Colby, P. M. (1995). Emotional conflict and well-being: Relation to perceived availability, daily utilization, and observer reports of social support. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68(5), 947–957. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.68.5.947.
Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610.
Etkin, A., Egner, T., Peraza, D. M., Kandel, E. R., & Hirsch, J. (2006). Resolving emotional conflict: A role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron, 51(6), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.12.003.
Falk, A., & Fischbacher, U. (2006). A theory of reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001.
Fehr, E., & Rockenbach, B. (2003). Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature, 422(6928), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01474.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151.
Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. (2005). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism: Experimental evidence and new theories. Handbook of the Economics Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, Vol 1. (pp. 615-691). Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7.
Feng, C., Luo, Y., & Krueger, F. (2015). Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 591–602.
Fiori, M., Lintas, A., Mesrobian, S., & Villa, A. E. P. (2013). Effect of emotion and personality on deviation from purely rational decision-making. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 474, 129–161.
Friedman, D., Nessler, D., Johnson, R., Jr., Ritter, W., & Bersick, M. (2007). Age-related changes in executive function: An event-related potential (erp) investigation of task-switching. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 15(1), 95–128.
Gabay, A. S., Radua, J., Kempton, M. J., & Mehta, M. A. (2014). The ultimatum game and the brain: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 549–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.014.
Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295(5563), 2279–2282. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066893.
Gilligan, J. (1976). Beyond morality: Psychoanalytic reflections on shame, guilt and love. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues (pp. 144–158). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Güroğlu, B., Bos, W. V. D., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Unfair? It depends: Neural correlates of fairness in social context. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq013.
Güroğlu, B., Bos, W. V. D., Dijk, E. V., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2011). Dissociable brain networks involved in development of fairness considerations: Understanding intentionality behind unfairness. Neuroimage, 57(2), 634–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.032.
Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7.
Haselhuhn, M. P., & Mellers, B. A. (2005). Emotions and cooperation in economic games. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.005.
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & Mcelreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.73.
Henrich, J., Mcelreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312(5781), 1767–1770. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333.
Hewig, J., Kretschmer, N., Trippe, R. H., Hecht, H., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., & Miltner, W. H. (2011). Why humans deviate from rational choice. Psychophysiology, 48(4), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.x.
Holroyd, C. B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Mars, R. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2004). Anterior cingulate cortex, selection for action, and error processing. Posner M.i.cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, 219–231.
Hu, J. (2008). The letter, validity and findings of the Chinese version of the questionnaire questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 236–238.
Hu, J., Blue, P. R., Yu, H., Gong, X., Yang, X., Jiang, C., & Zhou, X. (2016). Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv086.
Huffmeijer, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Alink, L. R., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2014). Reliability of event-related potentials: The influence of number of trials and electrodes. Physiology & Behavior, 130(6), 13–22.
Inaba, M., Inoue, Y., Akutsu, S., Takahashi, N., & Yamagishi, T. (2018). Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game. PLoS One, 13(3), e0193877.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/296367.
Knoch, D., Pascualleone, A., Meyer, K., Treyer, V., & Fehr, E. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314(5800), 829–832. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129156.
Koenigs, M., & Tranel, D. (2007). Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: Evidence from the ultimatum game. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(4), 951–956. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4606-06.2007.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. New York: Harper and Row.
Lee, D. (2008). Game theory and neural basis of social decision making. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2065.
McClure, S. M., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Time discounting for primary rewards. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(21), 5796–5804. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4246-06.2007.
McGraw, K. M. (1987). Guilt following transgression: An attribution of responsibility approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 53(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.53.2.247.
Mesrobian, S. K., Bader, M., Götte, L., Villa, A. E. P., & Lintas, A. (2015). Imperfect decision making and risk taking are affected by personality. Decision Making: Uncertainty, Imperfection, Deliberation and Scalability. Springer International Publishing.
Mirowsky, J. (1985). Depression and marital power: An equity model. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 557–592. https://doi.org/10.1086/228314.
Mosher, D. L. (1965). Interaction of fear and guilt in inhibiting unacceptable behavior. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021748.
Murnighan, J. K., & Saxon, M. S. (1998). Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(4), 415–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(98)00017-8.
Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 289(5485), 1773–1775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5485.1773.
Polezzi, D., Daum, I., Rubaltelli, E., Lotto, L., Civai, C., Sartori, G., & Rumiati, R. (2008). Mentalizing in economic decision-making. Behavioural Brain Research, 190(2), 218–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.003.
Radke, S., & De Bruij, E. (2012). The other side of the coin: Oxytocin decreases the adherence to fairness norms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(4), 193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00193.
Reuben, E., & Van Winden, F. (2010). Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(6), 908–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.08.001.
Rodrigues, J., Ulrich, N., & Hewig, J. (2015). A neural signature of fairness in altruism: A game of theta? Social Neuroscience, 10(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2014.977401.
Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300(5626), 1755–1758. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1082976.
Schmitt, P. M. (2004). On perceptions of fairness: The role of valuations, outside options, and information in ultimatum bargaining games. Experimental Economics, 7(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026210021955.
Sutton, R. S., & Barton, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An Introduction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.
Van Winden, F. (2010). Emotional hazard exemplified by taxation-induced anger. Kyklos, 54(2&3), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00166.
Wang, G., Li, J., Li, Z., Wei, M., & Li, S. (2016). Medial frontal negativity reflects advantageous inequality aversion of proposers in the ultimatum game: An erp study. Brain Research, 1639, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.02.040.
Weiland, S., Hewig, J., Hecht, H., Mussel, P., & Miltner, W. H. (2012). Neural correlates of fair behavior in interpersonal bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 7(5), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.674056.
Wu, Y., Leliveld, M. C., & Zhou, X. (2011). Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 88(2), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009.
Xiao, E., & Houser, D. (2005). Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(20), 7398–7401. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502399102.
Zahn-Waxier, C., & Kochanska, G. (1990). The origins of guilt. In R. A. Thompson (Ed.), The Nebraska symposium on motivation 1988: Socioemotional development (Vol. 36, pp. 182–258). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(49), 19761–19766. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112324108.
Zheng, Y., Cheng, X., Xu, J., Zheng, L., Li, L., Yang, G., et al. (2017). Proposers’ economic status affects behavioral and neural responses to unfairness. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 847.
Zinchenko, O., & Arsalidou, M. (2018). Brain responses to social norms: Meta-analyses of fMRI studies. Human Brain Mapping, 39(2), 955–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23895.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Grant No.70671092, 70971116 and 90924304 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and No. 13YJA630006 from the MOE (Ministry of Education) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences of China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MC: Main research conceptual framework and reporting.
XZ: Literature collection/review.
JZ: Literature review reorganization and discussion deepening.
GM: Methods and initial reporting.
YW: Design, data collection and analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Research highlights
• The proposers chose more highly unfair offers in a non-punishment condition.
• More highly unfair offers elicited larger MNF, no matter whether there was punishment mechanism.
• The MFN may reflect the existence of the proposers’ unfairness aversion and guilty feeling triggered by intentional violations of social fairness norm.
• The proposers do not give up the fairness norm in the cockles of the heart even in a non-punishment environment.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., Zhu, X., Zhang, J. et al. Neural correlates of proposers’ fairness perception in punishment and non-punishment economic games. Curr Psychol 40, 1838–1849 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0129-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0129-3