Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-making among the narcissistic subtypes: If I can’t benefit, then who should?

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigates how individuals high in grandiose or vulnerable narcissism make decisions and what motivates them. This study asked 98 (67 female, ages 18-34) participants to decide how to distribute $200 amongst a fictitious set of group members, two of which exemplified vulnerable or grandiose narcissistic traits. The participants completed questionnaires measuring their levels of grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, and how much they liked and identified with each fictitious group member. Individuals high in grandiose or vulnerable narcissism did not identify with any group member; however, individuals high in grandiose narcissism liked and decided to distribute more money to the group member with grandiose narcissistic traits. In addition, individuals high in grandiose or vulnerable narcissism strongly disliked and distributed less money to the group member with vulnerable narcissistic traits. Implications for the similarity-liking principle and narcissists’ decision-making processes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the scenario created for this study was fictitious, participants did not report suspicion about the authenticity of the task. To ensure this, we used in-person funnel-debriefing for the first ten participants to investigate any concerns or issues with the study design. We also asked all participants at the very end of the survey what they thought we were studying and if anything was unusual in the study. The majority of participants reported concern over the repetitiveness of the self-report questions; only three participants raised serious concerns over the money-related task. Excluding these participants does not significantly impact the results. Alternative analyses are available upon request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie D. Freis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freis, S.D., Allen, W.M. Decision-making among the narcissistic subtypes: If I can’t benefit, then who should?. Curr Psychol 41, 155–164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00558-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00558-6

Keywords

Navigation