Abstract
There is a lack of research investigating associative memory errors in sign language. Thus, the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm was used to test recall and recognition errors in deaf signers following four types of encoding: written words, signs, written words presented along with signs, or written words combined with self-produced signs. The results revealed poor memory for studied material along with a relatively low level of false memory for critical items. However, dual coding appeared to enhance veridical memory. Interestingly, a high rate of noncritical intrusions was noticed across all four encoding conditions. Similar results were obtained for recognition, however, there were no differences between encoding conditions in the false alarms rate toward critical lures. The results point to difficulties in accessing the meaning of words in deaf participants. To test this hypothesis a follow-up study was conducted where false recall and recognition of words or signs were tested in hearing participants fluent in sign language. The second experiment revealed semantic memory errors comparable to previous studies with hearing participants. The results from both experiments are discussed in light of previous studies on vocabulary knowledge in deaf individuals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akamatsu, C. T., & Fischer, S. D. (1991). Using immediate recall to assess language proficiency in deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 136, 428–434. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2012.0425.
Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(83)90201-3.
Anderson, R. C., & Ortony, A. (1975). On putting apples into bottles - a problem in polysemy. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90008-0.
Anisfield, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025782.
Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2003). The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-596x(02)00518-1.
Arnedt, S. C., & Gentile, R. (1986). A test of dual coding theory for bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080100.
Atkins, A. S., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (2008). False working memories? Semantic distortion in a mere 4 seconds. Memory & Cognition, 36, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.1.74.
Bhatt, R., Laws, K. R., & McKenna, P. J. (2010). False memory in schizophrenia patients with and without delusions. Psychiatry Research, 178, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.02.006.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290.
Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Kneer, R. (1995). False recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1995.1008.
Brainerd, C. J., Yang, Y., Reyna, V. F., Howe, M. L., & Mills, B. A. (2008). Semantic processing in “associative” false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1035–1053. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.6.1035.
Clark, L., & Grosjean, F. (1982). Sign recognition processes in American sign language: The effect of context. Language and Speech, 25, 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098202500402.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.82.6.407.
Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/s00225371(69)80069-1.
Coppens, K. M., Tellings, A., Verhoeven, L., & Schreuder, R. (2013). Reading vocabulary in children with and without hearing loss: The roles of task and word type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0138).
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046671.
Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (1998). Training programs to improve learning in later adulthood: Helping older adults educate themselves. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The educational psychology series. Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 249–275). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Emmorey, K. (2007). The psycholinguistics of signed and spoken languages: How biology affects processing. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 703–721). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0043.
Fagan, M. K., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Hearing experience and receptive vocabulary development in deaf children with cochlear implants. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15, 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq001.
Gallo, D. A., Roberts, M. J., & Seamon, J. G. (1997). Remembering words not presented in lists: Can we avoid creating false memories? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 271–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03209405.
Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger III, H. L. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.27.2.339.
Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202642.
Gardiner, J. M., Ramponi, C., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1998). Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1997.0321.
Gold, R., & Segal, O. (2017). Metaphor comprehension by deaf young adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 22, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enx010.
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguistics, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(89)90048-5.
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingualism, biculturalism, and deafness. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050903474051.
Hiddinga, H. J., & Crasborn, O. (2011). Signed languages and globalization. Language in Society, 40, 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404511000480.
Joormann, J., Teachman, B. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Sadder and less accurate? False memory for negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015621.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.163.
Koutstaal, W. (2003). Older adults encode–but do not always use–perceptual details: Intentional versus unintentional effects of detail on memory judgments. Psychological Science, 14, 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01441.
Koutstaal, W., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 555–583. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2529.
Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008.
Lederberg, A. R., & Spencer, P. E. (2001). Vocabulary development of young deaf and hard of hearing children. In M. D. Clark, M. Marschark, & M. Karchmer (Eds.), Context, cognition, and deafness (pp. 73–92). Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
Liberman, A. M., Borovsky, A., Hatrak, M., & Mayberry, R. I. (2015). Real time processing of ASL: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000088.
MacLeod, C. M., & Bodner, G. E. (2017). The production effect in memory. Psychological Science, 26, 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417691356.
Marmolejo, G., Diliberto-Macaluso, K., & Altarriba, J. (2009). False memory in bilinguals: Does switching languages increase false memories? The American Journal of Psychology, 122, 1–16 https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784371.
Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of deaf children. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marschark, M., & Everhart, V. S. (1999). Problem solving by hearing impaired and hearing children: Twenty questions. Hearing Impairment and Education International, 1, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1179/146431599790561370.
Marschark, M., & Wauters, L. (2008). Language comprehension and learning by deaf students. In M. Marschark & P. C. Hauser (Eds.), Deaf cognition: Foundations and outcomes (pp. 309–350). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0012.
Marschark, M., Convertino, C., McEvoy, C., & Masteller, A. (2004). Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals. American Annals of the Deaf, 149, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2004.0013.
Marschark, M., Shaver, D. M., Nagle, K. M., & Newman, L. (2015). Predicting the academic achievement of deaf and hard-of-hearing students from individual, household, communication, and educational factors. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563700.
Mazzoni, G. (2002). Naturally occurring and suggestion-dependent memory distortions: Convergence of disparate research traditions. European Psychologist, 7, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1027//1016-9040.7.1.17.
McDermott, K. B., & Roediger III, H. L. (1998). Attempting to avoid illusory memories: Robust false recognition of associates persists under conditions of explicit warnings and immediate testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2582.
McEvoy, C., Marschark, M., & Nelson, D. L. (1999). Comparing the mental lexicons of deaf and hearing individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.312.
McGeown, S. P., Gray, E. A., Robinson, J. L., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2014). What factors underline children’s susceptibility to semantic and phonological false memories? Investigating the roles of language skills and auditory short-term memory. Cognition, 131, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.005.
Morford, J. P., Wilkinson, E., Villwock, A., Piñar, P., & Kroll, J. F. (2011). When deaf signers read English: Do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition, 118, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006.
Olszewska, J., & Ulatowska, J. (2013). Encoding strategy affects false recall and recognition: Evidence from categorical study material. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0130-0.
Orfanidou, E., Adam, R., McQueen, J. M., & Morgan, G. (2009). Making sense of nonsense in British sign language (BSL): The contribution of different phonological parameters to sign recognition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.37.3.302.
Ozubko, J. D., Hourihan, K. L., & MacLeod, C. M. (2012). Production benefits learning: The production effect endures and improves memory for text. Memory, 20, 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.699070.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195066661.003.0004.
Paivio, A. (2014). Bilingual dual coding theory and memory. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Foundations of bilingual memory (pp. 41–62). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9218-4_3.
Paivio, A., Clark, J., & Lambert, W. (1988). Bilingual dual-coding theory and semantic repetition effects on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.14.1.163.
Paul, P. (1996). Reading vocabulary knowledge and deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014279.
Paul, P. (2009). Language and deafness (4th ed.). Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Prezbindowski, A., & Lederberg, A. (2003). Vocabulary assessment of deaf and hard-of-hearing children from infancy through the preschool years. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8, 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eng031.
Quillian, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science, 12(5), 410–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830120511.
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4.
Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic distance. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(73)80056-8.
Roediger III, H. L., & McDermott, K. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.21.4.803.
Roediger III, H. L., Watson, J. M., McDermott, K. B., & Gallo, D. A. (2001). Factors that determine false recall: A multiple regression analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196177.
Roediger III, H. L., McDermott, K. B., Pisoni, D. P., & Gallo, D. A. (2004). Illusory recollection of voices. Memory, 12, 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000125.
Rose, S., McAnally, P., & Quigley, S. P. (2004). Language development practices with deaf children (3rd ed.). Austin: Pro-Ed. https://doi.org/10.1177/02656590080240010603.
Sahlin, B. H., Harding, M. G., & Seamon, S. G. (2005). When do false memories cross language boundaries in English–Spanish bilinguals? Memory & Cognition, 33, 1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193374.
Schembri, A., & Johnston, T. (2007). Sociolinguistic variation in the use of fingerspelling in Australian sign language: A pilot study. Sign Language Studies, 7, 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2007.0019.
Schembri, A., McKee, D., McKee, R., Johnston, T., & Goswell, D. (2009). Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand sign languages: The location variable. Language Variation and Change, 21, 193–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954394509990081.
Schirmer, B. (2000). Language and literacy development in children who are deaf. New York: Merrill.
Shand, M. A. (1982). Sign-based short-term coding of American sign language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90002-0.
Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2010). Language processing in bimodal bilinguals: Cognition, education, and language processing. In E. F. Caldwell (Ed.), Bilinguals: Cognition, education, and language processing (pp. 35–64). Hauppauge: Nova Science.
Shook, A., & Marian, V. (2012). Bimodal bilinguals co-activate both languages during spoken comprehension. Cognition, 124(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.05.014.
Smith, R. E., & Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 710–715. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208850.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1997.0658.
Smith, R. E., Lozito, J. P., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). Adult age differences in distinctive processing: The modality effect on false recall. Psychology and Aging, 20, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.486.
Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., & Gallagher, M. P. (2008). The effect of study modality on false recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1439–1449. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.8.1439.
Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.117.1.34.
Spencer, P. E., & Lederberg, A. R. (1997). Different modes, different models: Communication and language of young deaf children and their mothers. In L. B. Adamson & M. A. Romski (Eds.), Communication and language acquisition: Discoveries from atypical development (pp. 203–230). Baltimore: Brookes.
Stamp, R. (2016). Do signers understand regional varieties of a sign language? A lexical recognition experiment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env044.
Stamp, R., Schembri, A., Fenlon, J., Rentelis, R., Woll, B., & Cormier, K. (2014). Lexical variation and change in British sign language. PLoS One, 9(4), e94053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094053.
Trezek, B., Wang, Y., & Paul, P. (2010). Processes and components of reading. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deaf (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190241414.001.0001.
Ulatowska, J., & Olszewska, J. (2013). Creating associative memory distortions - a polish adaptation of the DRM paradigm. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0048.
Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022014.
Villameriel, S., Dias, P., Costello, B., & Carreiras, M. (2016). Cross-language and cross-modal activation in hearing bimodal bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.11.005.
Weekes, B. S., Hamilton, S., Oakhill, J., & Holliday, R. E. (2008). False recollection in children with reading comprehension difficulties. Cognition, 106, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.01.005.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2002.2864.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by The National Science Centre Grant DEC-2011/01/D/HS6/05482.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at The Maria Grzegrzewska University. The manuscript is original, not previously published, and not under concurrent consideration elsewhere. We confirm that the informed consent was granted by the participants and that they were debriefed.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ulatowska, J., Olszewska, J., Wiśniewska, D. et al. The DRM paradigm in sign language: An investigation of associative memory errors in deaf and hearing signers. Curr Psychol 40, 5456–5470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00492-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00492-7