Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using online resources in health co-inquiry: A bifurcated method for analyzing stakeholder narratives

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Health Co-Inquiry is a process whereby stakeholders in management of chronic health (or mental health) conditions collaborate, with efforts toward stakeholder activation, person-centeredness, evidence-based practice, and integrated care. With rapid growth of Internet use by the general population in the new millennium, persons with chronic conditions and their caregivers, friends, family, and health providers may be using the Internet more in order to seek information, share advice, and give or find support and services. Thus, the Internet can provide an important avenue for Health Co-Inquiry and for researchers who want to know about stakeholder experiences. A fundamental aim of the current authors’ “Health Co-Inquiry Project” is to better understand stakeholder experiences in chronic conditions through their online narratives. Here we report, specifically, about our development of a Bifurcated Method for analyzing narratives online. It involves: (1) thematic analysis of narratives from publicly available blogs, forums, and other websites related to chronic health conditions, and (2) creation of a computer program that “crawls” the URLs to locate and count the frequencies of general health and condition-specific terms and provide pictorial representations of the relative frequencies of words on a web page. The Bifurcated Method is novel in social research, using online forums as data, evaluating them thematically, and crawling them with a computer program that quantitizes specified search terms. One benefit is comparison of results from the two sub-parts to look for apparently convergent and divergent information across the two prongs of analysis. Safeguards include removing stakeholder monikers from quoted narratives, and striving to use only publicly available URLs. The present report provides details about the Bifurcated Method and considers limitations of the approach for those who might use it. Specific results for each health condition from the larger Health Co-Inquiry Project are provided elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, L. A. (2008). Blogging during terminal care: Communication, color schemes, and creating a community. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26(27), 4504–4506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. E. (2009). A life course disability model for understanding aging with a chronic condition. Unplublished doctoral dissertation. Miami, OH: Miami University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratu, S. (2017). The inexorable shift towards an increasingly hostile cyberspace environment: The adverse social impact of online trolling behavior. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 9(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.22381/CRLSJ9220176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (Ed.). (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, Nj: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, K. C., Rickett, E. M., & Masi, C. M. (2005). Sociality, spirituality, and meaning making; Chicago health, aging, and social relations study. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, P.P, Mawokomatanda, T., Xu, F., Gamble, S., Flegel, D., Peirannunzi, C.,…Town, M. (2016). Surveillance for certain health behaviors, chronic diseases, and conditions, access to health care, and use of preventive health services among states and selected local areas --behavioral risk factor surveillance system, United States, 2012. US Department of Health and Human Services MMWR, 65(4), 1–88.

  • Chung, D. S., & Kim, S. (2008). Blogging activity among cancer oatients and their companions: Uses, gratifications, and predictors of outcomes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemence, M. (1966). Existentialism: A philosophy of commitment. The American Journal of Nursing, 66(3), 500–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, N. S. (2005). Receiving social support online: An analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(6), 580–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, N. S., & Greenwood, N. (2012). Families affected by childhood cancer: An analysis of the provision of social support within online support groups. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(6), 870–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, N. S., & Knibb, R. C. (2007). Coping with food allergy: Exploring the role of the online support group. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K., Schoenbaum, S. C., & Audet, A.-M. (2005). A 2020 vision of patient-centered primary care. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(10), 953–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNardis, L., & Hackly, A. M. (2015). Internet governance by social media platforms. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, M. J., & Feng, H. (2007). Health orientation and disease state predictors of online health support group use. Health Communication, 22(2), 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: A challenge for medicine. Science, 196(4286), 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falvo, D. R. (2014). Medical and psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Approves Third (2018). In How does migraine affect your body? Retrieved https://www.webmd.com/migraines-headaches/news/20180928/fda-approves-third-of-new-migraine-drugs.

  • Frerichs, L., Lich, K. H., Dave, G., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2016). Integrating systems science and community-based participatory action research to achieve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilferty, C. M. (2011). Ethical considerations in the study of online illness narratives: A qualitative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67(5), 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05563.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J. H., Greene, J., & Tusler, M. (2009). Improving the outcomes of disease-management by tailoring care to the patient’s level of activation. American Journal of Managed Care, 15(6), 353–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J. H., Mahoney, E. R., Stock, R., & Tusler, M. (2007). Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors? Health Services Research, 42(4), 1443–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, J. H., & Tusler, M. (2007). Assessing activation stage and employing a “next steps” approach to supporting patient self-management. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 30(1), 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research. (2016). About us. Retrieved from http://www.icphr.org.

  • Internet Users (2019). In Internet Live Stats. Retrieved from http://www.Internetlivestats.com/Internet-users/

  • Jaborooty, M. P., & Baker, P. (2017). Resisting silence: Moments of empowerment in Iranian women’s blogs. Gender and Language, 11(1), 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. B., & Ku, L. (2015). Sharing a playbook: Integrated care in community health centers in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 105(10), 2028–2034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Chung, D. S. (2007). Characteristics of cancer blog users. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(4), 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowney, A. C., & O’Brien, T. (2012). The landscape of blogging in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 26(6), 858–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. K., & Simon, A. (2012). Living and lurking on LiveJournal: The benefits of active and non-active membership. ASLIB Proceedings, 64(3), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. M. (2015) Social media and the public interest: Governance of news platforms in the realm of Individual and algorithmic gatekeepers. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D., & Preece, J. (2006). Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behaviors. Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurjono, M., Valentijn, P.P., Bautista, M.C., Wei, L.Y., & Vrijhoef, H.J.M. (2016). A prospective validation study of a rainbow model of integrated care measurement tool in Singapore. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16. Retrieved from www.ijic.org.

  • Obar, J. A. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications Policy, 39(9), 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, H.J., & Lee, B. (2012). The effect of computer-mediated social support in online communities on patient empowerment and doctor-patient communication. Health Communication, 27, 30-41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.567449 in Singapore. International Journal of Integrated Care, 16. Retrieved from www.ijic.org

  • Paulus, T. M., & Varga, M. A. (2015). “Please know that you are not alone with your pain”: Responses to newcomer posts in an online grief support forum. Death Studies, 39(10), 633–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2013). The demographics of social media users – 2012. Washington, DC: Authors Retrieved from http://boletines.prisadigital.com/PIP_SocialMediaUsers.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Knafl, G. (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809334210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Participant anonymity in the internet age: From theory to practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.948697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Seckin, G. (2011). Informational and decisional empowerment in online health support communities: Initial psychometric validation of the cyber info-decisional empowerment scale (CIDES) and preliminary data from administration of the scale. Support Care Cancer, 19, 2057–2061. https://doi.org/10.1007/soo520-011-1249-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, L.S. (2015). Is there room for traditional science and action research in aging studies? Poster presented at the fifth annual conference of the society for Aging & Society, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Seifert, L. S., Flaherty, K., & Trill, K. (2013). Beyond person-centered dementia care: The see-saw model for day-to-day interactions. Activities Directors’ Quarterly for Alzheimer’s and Other Dementia Patients, 14(2), 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, L. S., & Seifert, C. A. (2017). Multi-method health Co-Inquiry: A case illustration for persons with chronic illness, caregivers, providers, and researchers. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9676-7 Multi-Method Health Co-Inquiry: a Case Illustration for Persons with Chronic Illness, Caregivers, Providers, and Researchers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2018). Health Information Privacy: The Security Rule. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/security/index.html.

  • Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2014). Factfiles: Non-communicable diseases. Retrieved from www.who.int/features/factfiles/noncommunicable_diseases/en/

Download references

Funding

This study is supported in part through an institutional grant from The National Science Foundation to Malone University. CC-NIE Award Number #1541342. The current authors received a grant sub-award from it. Special thanks go to M. Adam Klemman, Jim Shaffer, Jason Courter, and Shawn Campbell (recipients of the institutional grant), who utilized it to help enhance our data collection. Additional thanks go to Camden Baucke, J. “Harley” Ferrel, Tess Schmucker, Matthew Beechy, Rosa Cleaver, Tyler Bowman, Kathryn Bash, and Evan Zorn, for their assistance searching for URLs and composing dictionaries for specific health conditions. Special thanks go to Rosella Groves for graphics and to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren S. Seifert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author indicates that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The current research was supported by a grant sub-award via an institutional grant from the National Science Foundation, CC-NIE Award Number #1541342. Additional information about the grant can be found in the acknowledgements that accompany this article. The study was reviewed and approved through an expedited review procedure via our institution’s IRB. The study protocol is compliant with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and later addenda, the Belmont Report, and Title 45 Part 46 of the US Code of Federal Regulations.

Informed Consent

The current study uses online posts that are publicly available. The data are artifacts, and no contact with live participants occurred during data collection. As such, informed consent was not sought. However, as a research safeguard, all online users whose posts were used as data were assigned random participant numbers. Thus, no online monikers are provided in our published reports, and this helps to create a buffer between readers of our published reports and the online posters.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Condition-Specific Dictionary for Alzheimer’s Disease*

Alzheimer//vascular damage //temporal cortex //amyloid precursor protein//synaptopathy //central cholinergic //peripheral cholinergic //cholinergic neuron //semantic dementia //glycogen synthase //brain aging //DYRK1A kinase //DYRK1A//neuron cytoskeleton //amyloid-beta aggregation //Aβ//b-amyloid oligomer toxicity //receptor-mediated β-amyloid//β-amyloid oligomer //mutant β-amyloid fibrils//automatic memory processing //automatic processing//onset//neuropsychological //dementia //disease //neurofibrillary tangle //NFT//cognitive deficit //impairment //beta-secretase //BACE1//gene discovery //novel loci//TARDBP mutation //TARDBP//TDP-43//amyloid-β//neurovascular defect//hyperphosphorylation of TAU//neurofibrillary //TAU triage //frontotemporal dementia //metal theory //cerebrospinal fluid biomarker//neurodegeneration//vascular brain injury //prevention //assessment //treatment//psychosocial //diffusion tensor//diffusion tensor imaging//biomarker//diagnosis //brain structural imaging //cognitive impairment //white matter //gray matter //neuronal dysfunction //18F-AV-45//florbetapir//Amyvid//18F//Pittstburgh compound B//position emission//dietary factor//LEARN model //latent early-life associated regulation//intracellular amyloid β-protein //apomorphine //Aβ42 aggregation //prefrontal cortex//reversal learning impairment //OFβAPP//PrPc//α-secretase //metalloproteinase-mediated //metalloproteinase//metalloprotease//app α-secretase cleavage //Β-peptide-mediated //neuronal death //gene regulation //BACE1//CREB//Fe65//APBB1//YY1//y-secretase complex assembly //pro-inflammatory cytokine//modulate glial expression //apolipoprotein E protein //apolipoprotein//lipoprotein receptor //tau-induced neurodegeneration //tauopathy//tauopathies//neuropsychiatric symptom//vascular dementia //fatty aspirin //amyloid-β oligomer //human body fluid //early diagnosis//therapy monitoring //visual impairment //clinical pathophysiological //mitochondrial hapgroups //18F-FDG-PET imaging //artificial neural network //milestone//difficulties //difficulty//memory processing //age of onset //neuropsychological feature //significant neuronal loss//toxic effect//spatial pattern //late-onset sporadic Alzheimer’s disease //FAD//familial//altered state//brain function//vegetative state //mild cognitive impairment//mitochondrial pathology //calmodulin //Transgenic Model //COX-2 inhibitor //copper studies //copper chelator//anti-Alzheimer //behavioral disturbance//immunotherapy //cerebral amyloid angiopathy//antidepressant//cystatin//cysteine//neurogeneration //acetylcholinesterase-inhibitory potential //acetylcholinesterase//quercetin //AZD-103//NSAID//symptom//sign//outlook //memory test //blood test //genetic test //brain scan //improving communication //memory aid //losing things //non-recognition //hallucination//restless //agitation //sexual behavior //emotional support //loss //despair//guilt //nursing home //financial capacity //psychological treatment //drug trial//drug//plaque//tau//living brain //new technology //genetic//vascular disease //memory loss//insulin resistance //inflammation //cognitive reserve //drug treatment//gene discovery //neurovascular defect//hyperphosphorylation of TAU//neurofibrillary degeneration //TAU triage //frontotemporal dementia//metal theory //vascular brain injury//risk factor//risk //preventative //hypertension //medicine//brain food //nutrition //body upkeep //physical exercise //cognitive engagement //social network//stage//early onset//late onset.

* Due to the length of the list, we have used // to separate terms in order to conserve space.

Appendix 2: List of Ten Resource Books about Alzheimer’s Disease Used to Make the Condition-Specific Dictionary

Barak, Y. (2013) Preventing Alzheimer’s disease: Personal responsibility. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Barrack, S. (2013) Neuroimaging biomarkers in Alzheimers disease. [place of publication not identified]: iMedPub.

Boyd, M. R., (2010) Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis & treatment. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Cayton, H., Graham, N., & Warner, J. (2008). Alzheimer’s and other dementias: Answers at your Fingertips. London, UK: Class Publishing.

Derreumaux, P., (2012), Alzheimer’s disease & insights into low molecular weight and cytotoxic aggregates from invitro & computer experiments- Molecular basis of amyloid-beta protein aggregation & fibril formation. Singapore: Imperial College Press.

Hoffman, J., Golant, S. K., & Froemke, S. (2009). The Alzheimer’s Project: Momentum in science. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

Lahiri, D., K. (Ed.). (2013) Advances in Alzheimer’s research (Vol. 1). Sharjah, UAE: Bentham Science Publishers.

Perry, G., Zhu, X., Smith, M.A., Sorensen, A., & Avila, J. (2009) Alzheimer’s disease: Advances for a new century. Amsterdam, NL: IOS Press.

Ronson, C. E. (2011) Alzheimer’s diagnosis. New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Inc.

Sun, M. (2013) Alzheimer’s disease research compendium. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Appendix 3: Seed URLs for Alzheimer’s Disease

Google

http://www.alzforum.org/

http://patient.info/forums/discuss/browse/alzheimer-s-disease-67

https://www.alzconnected.org/discussion.aspx

http://www.healingwell.com/community/?f=8

http://www.psychforums.com/alzheimer/

http://www.dementiaforum.org/discuss/forum/

http://ehealthforum.com/health/alzheimers.html

http://www.medhelp.org/forums/Alzheimers-Disease/show/379

http://www.healthboards.com/boards/alzheimers-disease-dementia/

https://forum.alzheimers.org.uk/

https://www.patientslikeme.com/conditions/114-alzheimer-s-disease

http://www.topix.com/forum/health/alzheimers-disease

http://www.worldhealth.net/forum/show/43/alzheimer-s-disease/

http://alzinfo.org/alztalk/forums/

http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Alzheimers-disease/Pages/community.aspx

http://www.curezone.org/forums/f.asp?f=21

https://www.diseasemaps.org/alzheimer-disease/forum/

http://www.50plusforum.com/forums/alzheimers-disease/

https://forum.grasscity.com/threads/thc-vs-a-d.1413051/

Ask

https://www.facebook.com/DementiaAlzheimersCaregiversForum/

http://caregiveraction.org/forum

https://www.caring.com/alzheimers-support

http://www.city-data.com/forum/caregiving/

http://alzheimers.proboards.com/

http://thealzheimerspouse.com/vanillaforum/

https://www.depend.com/caring-for-others/caregivers-forum

http://www.helpwithdementia.org.au/forums/

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2011/nov/21/picks-disease-early-onset-dementia

http://www.psychforums.com/alzheimer/topic21706.html

http://www.dementiajourneys.com/wp/forums/forum/forum/

https://www.enotalone.com/forum/showthread.php?t=388193\.

https://www.agingcare.com/alzheimers-dementia/questions?page=1

http://www.medschat.com/Discuss/Alzheimers-Dementia/

http://abchomeopathy.com/forum2.php/33884/

http://www.alz.org/living_with_alzheimers_8510.asp

http://www.usagainstalzheimers.org/story-sharing/people-alzheimers-0

http://activitydirector.net/forum/forum/13-activities-alzheimers-and-dementia/#.

Bing

http://blog.alz.org/

https://able2know.org/forum/alzheimers/

https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/dementia

http://forums.digitalspy.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2115235&page=2

https://www.alzu.org/forum/list.php?6

https://www.mentalhealthforum.net/forum/forum324.html

www.mdjunction.com/forums/alzheimers-disease-discussions/alzheimers-resources

https://destee.com/threads/alzheimers.54993/

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=5237647

http://exchanges.webmd.com/alzheimers-exchange/forum/index

https://www.dementiacarecentral.com/forum/

http://www.caregiveraction.org/forum/

https://www.420magazine.com/forums/alzheimer-s-disease/

http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=1021641 http://forum.forteantimes.com/index.php?threads/alzheimers.20083/page-2

http://www.womanandhome.com/forums/threads/76438-Poem-An-Alzheimers-Request http://www.aplaceformom.com/blog/communication-with-a-loved-one-with-dementia/ https://healthunlocked.com/alzheimer-support

http://www.curezone.org/forums/search.asp?q=alzheimers+disease&action=Search

https://wddty.com/community/forum/wddty/health-conditions/1922-natural-remedies-for-dementia-alzheimers-disease-what-have-you-tried-saffron-turmeric-cocon

Yahoo

https://www.reddit.com/r/Alzheimers/

http://www.helpforalzheimersfamilies.com/dementia-support-network/your-questions-answered/

http://www.caregiverstress.com/2011/10/is-there-a-web-site-where-i-can-chat-with-other-caregivers/

http://mikegamble.websitetoolbox.com/post/alzheimersdementia-chat-room-2285763 http://www.helpforalzheimersfamilies.com/alzheimers-care-training/live-chat-reflections/

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r26953354-Alzheimers-Disease

http://www.abc-directory.com/site/990026

http://www.experienceproject.com/groups/Have-A-Father-With-Alzheimers-Disease/5298

http://www.healthinforum.org/Conditions-and-Diseases-Neurological-Disorders-cat-92-3.html

http://www.care2.com/greenliving/7-stages-of-alzheimers-disease.html

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081220101419AAnfMsF&p=coping%20with%20alzheimers%20yahoo%20answers

Appendix 4

Fig. 2
figure 2

Screen shot with sample word cloud for migraine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seifert, L.S., Kaelber, K., Flaherty, K. et al. Using online resources in health co-inquiry: A bifurcated method for analyzing stakeholder narratives. Curr Psychol 38, 1772–1788 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00474-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00474-9

Keywords

Navigation