Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtuous humor and the dispositions towards ridicule and laughter: Investigating their contribution to happiness

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are different concepts of humor: virtuous humor (i.e., benevolent and corrective humor) which represents the morally good, and three dispositions towards ridicule and laughter, namely the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia), the joy of being laughed at (gelotophilia), and the joy of laughing at others (katagelasticism). In the current study, we aim to investigate the relationship of virtuous humor and dispositions towards ridicule and laughter with happiness. A sample of 229 Spanish undergraduates completed self-reports of the corresponding measures. Regression analyses revealed individual differences in humor predicting happiness. Gelotophobia and corrective humor were negatively associated with happiness, whereas gelotophilia and benevolent humor were positively associated with happiness. The effect of gelotophilia on happiness may be due to the existing relationship between gelotophilia and benevolent humor. Our study extends prior research into the contribution of novel forms of humor to positive outcomes and replicates important findings on the relationship between humor and happiness. In sum, the results demonstrated that virtuous humor and dispositions towards ridicule and laughter can be adequately assessed among Spanish samples, and that it is important to consider novel forms of humor in the study of happiness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009a). How virtuous is humor? Evidence from everyday behavior. Humor, 22(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beermann, U., & Ruch, W. (2009b). How virtuous is humor? What we can learn from current instruments. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6), 528–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760903262859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blasco-Belled, A., Rogoza, R., Torrelles-Nadal, C., & Alsinet, C. (2019). Emotional intelligence structure and its relationship with life satisfaction and happiness: New findings from the bifactor model. Journal of Happiness Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00167-x.

  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Ryan, K. L. (2013). Universals and cultural differences in the causes and structure of happiness: A multilevel review. In C. L. M. Keyes (Ed.), Mental well-being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health (pp. 153–176). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. R., & Martin, R. A. (2014). The conceptualization, measurement, and role of humor as a character strength in positive psychology. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i3.759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2014). The Subjective Happiness Scale: Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Spanish version. Social Indicators Research, 119, 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0497-2

  • Greengross, G., & Geoffrey, M. F. (2008). Dissing Oneself versus Dissing Rivals: Effects of Status, Personality, and Sex on the Short-Term and Long-Term Attractiveness of Self-Deprecating and Other-Deprecating Humor. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 393–408

  • Hayashi, K., Kawachi, I., Ohira, T., Kondo, K., Shirai, K., & Kondo, N. (2016). Laughter is the best medicine? A cross-sectional study of cardiovascular disease among older Japanese adults. Journal of Epidemiology, 26(10), 546–552. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20150196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, S., Ruch, W., Platt, T., Pang, D., Carretero-Dios, H., Dionigi, A., et al. (2018). Psychometric comparisons of benevolent and corrective humor across 22 countries: The virtue gap in humor goes international. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(92), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2019). From four to nine styles: An update on individual differences in humor. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2018.12.008

  • Hofmann, J. (2018). Putting “laughing at yourself ” to the test. Humor, 31(2), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, J., Ruch, W., Proyer, R. T., Platt, T., & Gander, F. (2017). Assessing dispositions toward ridicule and laughter in the workplace: Adapting and validating the PhoPhiKat-9 questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(714), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, J., Heintz, S., Pang, D., & Ruch, W. (2019). Differential relationships of light and darker forms of humor with mindfulness. Applied Research in Quality of Life. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9698-9.

  • Joshanloo, M., & Niknam, S. (2019). The tripartite model of mental well-being in Iran: Factorial and discriminant validity. Current Psychology, 38(1), 128–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9595-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, V. (2011). Do humor styles matter in the relationship between personality and subjective well-being? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 52, 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00898.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Layous, K. T. I. N., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The how, why, what, when, and who of happiness. In J. G. & J. Moscowitz (Ed.), Positive emotion: Integrating the light sides and dark sides (pp. 473–495). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H.S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041

  • Martin, R. A. (2001). Humor, laughter, and physical health: Methodological issues and research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 504–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A. (2007). The social psychology of humor. In The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, P. E. (1996). Health, healing, and the amuse system. In Humor as survival training (2nd ed.). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, L., & Ruch, W. (2011). Humor and strengths of character. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(5), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2011.592508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Ruch, W., Beermann, U., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2007). The journal of positive psychology strengths of character, orientations to happiness, and life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(3), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701228938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, T. (2008). Emotional responses to ridicule and teasing: Should gelotophobes react differently? Humor, 21(2), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2008.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., Ali, N. S., Al-Olimat, H. S., Amemiya, T., Adal, T. A., et al. (2009). Breaking ground in cross-cultural research on the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia): A multi-national study involving 73 countries. Humor, 22(1–2), 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Chen, G. H. (2012). Gelotophobia: Life satisfaction and happiness across cultures. Humor, 25(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2012-0002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Buschor, C. (2013). Testing strengths-based interventions: A preliminary study on the effectiveness of a program targeting curiosity, gratitude, Hope, humor, and zest for enhancing life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9331-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renner, K.-H., & Heydasch, T. (2010). Performing humor: On the relations between self-presentation styles, gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(2), 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (2008). Psychology of humor. In V. Raskin (Ed.), A primer of humor research (pp. 17–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W. (2012). Towards a new structural model of the sense of humor: Preliminary findings. In Proceedings of the AAAI fall symposium FS-12-02: Artificial intelligence of humor (pp. 65–78). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2016). The virtue gap in humor: Exploring benevolent and corrective humor. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 2(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2009). Extending the study of gelotophobia: On gelotophiles and katagelasticists. Humor, 22(1–2), 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Hofmann, J., Platt, T., & Proyer, R. (2014). The state-of-the art in gelotophobia research: A review and some theoretical extensions. Humor, 27(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2013-0046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Heintz, S., Platt, T., Wagner, L., Proyer, R. T., & Horstmann, K. T. (2018). Broadening humor: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W., Wagner, L., & Heintz, S. (2018). Humor, the PEN model of personality, and subjective well-being: Support for differential relationships with eight comic styles. Rivista Italiana Di Studi sull’Umorismo RISU, 1(1), 31–44.

  • Samson, A. C., Proyer, R. T., Ceschi, G., Pedrini, P. P., & Ruch, W. (2011). The fear of being laughed at in Switzerland: Regional differences and the role of positive psychology. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Hidding, W. (1963). European key words. Vol I: Humor and wit. Munich: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Voracek, M., & Tran, U. S. (2018). “A joke a day keeps the doctor away?” meta-analytical evidence of differential associations of habitual humor styles with mental health. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. F., Kashdan, T. B., & Oishi, S. (2008). Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Marín, J., Carretero-Dios, H., Acosta, A., & Lupiáñez, J. (2017). Eye contact and fear of being laughed at in a gaze discrimination task. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1954), 1–1954),14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Marín, J., Proyer, R. T., López-Benítez, R., & Carretero-Dios, H. (2019) Assessing individual differences in the way of people deal with ridicule and being laughed at: The Spanish Form of the PhoPhiKat-45. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016). Humor-based online positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled long-term trial. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(6), 584–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellenzohn, S., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2018). Who benefits from humor-based positive psychology interventions? The moderating effects of personality traits and sense of humor. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00821.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat de Lleida, Avinguda de l’estudi general n°4, 25001, Lleida, Spain

    Ana Blasco-Belled, Cristina Torrelles-Nadal & Carles Alsinet

  2. Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Dewajtis 5, 01-815, Warszawa, Poland

    Radosław Rogoza

Authors
  1. Ana Blasco-Belled
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Radosław Rogoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristina Torrelles-Nadal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carles Alsinet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blasco-Belled, A., Rogoza, R., Torrelles-Nadal, C. et al. Virtuous humor and the dispositions towards ridicule and laughter: Investigating their contribution to happiness. Curr Psychol 42, 16259–16267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00461-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00461-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation