Advertisement

The efficacy of work engagement interventions: A meta-analysis of controlled trials

  • Delia Vîrgă
  • Laurenţiu P. MaricuţoiuEmail author
  • Alina Iancu
Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

This review aims to assess the efficacy of controlled interventions aimed at improving the work engagement. We conducted a systematic search of online databases (e.g. PsychInfo, Eric, MedLine, EconLit), using combinations of keywords such as “work engagement”, “vigor”, “dedication”, “absorption”, “intervention”, “trial”, “control”. The search yielded 647 unique results. The eligibility criteria were a) to report a controlled intervention and b) to assess the intervention efficacy using a work engagement scale. To assess intervention efficacy, we computed the standardized differences (Cohen’s d) between the experimental and the control group, in the post-intervention measures. Using a random-effects approach, we analyzed 54 trials (Nexperimental = 4938; Ncontrol = 5190). The average effect size was weak, but statistically significant (dgeneral = .24, SE = .04, 95% CI [.16–.32], k = 54). Heterogeneity analyses indicated that variance about 74% of the between-study variance could be attributed to moderator variables (I2 = 73.73). We identified moderator variables such as the time lag between the end of the intervention (the effect decreases as the time lag increases), the intervention method (the largest effect is in the soft skills interventions), and intervention length (interventions up to 5 weeks are the most effective). The results offer a new perspective on how to implement effective employee engagement programs by HR specialists.

Keywords

Work/job/employee engagement Effectiveness Interventions Moderators Randomized controlled trials 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first and the second authors contributed equally; order of authorship is arbitrary. This work was partially supported by a grant from the Romanian Ministry of Education, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0398. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12144_2019_438_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
12144_2019_438_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. *Aikens, K., Astin, J., Pelletier, K., Levanovich, K., Baase, C., Park, Y., & Bodnar, C. (2014). Mindfulness Goes to work. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, 721–731.  https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. *Akkermans, J., Brenninkmeijer, V., Schaufeli, W., & Blonk, R. (2014). It's all about CareerSKILLS: Effectiveness of a career development intervention for young employees. Human Resource Management, 54, 533–551.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association. (2002). Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines. American Psychologist, 57, 1052–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.12.1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839–851.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. *Ângelo, R., & Chambel, M. (2013). An intervention with firefighters to promote psychological occupational health according to the job demands-resources model. Revista de Psicología Social, 28, 197–210.  https://doi.org/10.1174/021347413806196753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Job-demands resources theory. In P. Y. Chen & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Work & wellbeing: Wellbeing: A complete reference guide (pp. 37–64). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Bakker, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). Positive organizational behavior: Engaged employees in flourishing organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 147–154.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274–284.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bakker, A., Albrecht, S., & Leiter, M. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 4–28.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2010.485352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 273–285.Google Scholar
  13. Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. A. (2008). Comprehensive review and a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26, 109–160.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830802094429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Bernburg, M., Baresi, L., Groneberg, D., & Mache, S. (2016). Does psychosocial competency training for junior physicians working in pediatric medicine improve individual skills and perceived job stress. European Journal of Pediatrics, 175, 1905–1912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-016-2777-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. *Biggs A. (2011). A longitudinal evaluation of strain, work engagement, and intervention strategies to address the health of high-risk employees. Griffith University. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
  16. *Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Barbour, J. P. (2014). Enhancing work-related attitudes and work engagement: A quasi-experimental study of the impact of an organizational intervention. International Journal of Stress Management, 21, 43–68.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. *Bolier, L., Ketelaar, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Smeets, O., Gärtner, F., & Sluiter, J. (2014). Workplace mental health promotion online to enhance well-being of nurses and allied health professionals: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions, 1, 196–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2014.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis (version 2) [computer software]. Englewood: Biostat.Google Scholar
  19. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. *Bresó, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Can a self-efficacy-based intervention decrease burnout, increase engagement, and enhance performance? A quasi-experimental study. Higher Education, 61, 339–355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9334-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. *Calitz T. (2013). An empowerment programme to regain positive work engagement for social workers in the North West Province. (PhD), Potchefstroom campus of the North-West University, South Africa.Google Scholar
  22. *Chen, S., Westman, M., & Eden, D. (2009). Impact of enhanced resources on anticipatory stress and adjustment to new information technology: A field-experimental test of conservation of resources theory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 219–230.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Christian, M., Garza, A., & Slaughter, J. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. *Cifre, E., Salanova, M., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. (2010). Dancing between theory and practice: Enhancing work engagement through work stress intervention. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21, 269–286.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. *Coffeng, J. K., Hendriksen, I. J. M., Duijts, S. F. A., Twisk, J. W. R., van Mechelen, W., & Boot, C. R. L. (2014). Effectiveness of a combined social and physical environmental intervention on Presenteeism, absenteeism, work performance, and work engagement in office employees. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56, e83.  https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Critchley, H., & Gibbs, S. (2012). The effects of positive psychology on the efficacy beliefs of school staff. Educational and Child Psychology, 29, 64–76 Doi not available.Google Scholar
  28. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A., de Jonge, J., Janssen, P., & Schaufeli, W. (2001). Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27, 279–286.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Di Stefano, G., & Gaudiino, M. (2019). Workaholism and work engagement: How are they similar? How are they different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 329–347.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1590337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. *Dubbelt, L. (2016). Women to the top: Discovering facilitating factors for women's functioning in minority positions. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar
  31. *Dyrbye, L., West, C., Richards, M., Ross, H., Satele, D., & Shanafelt, T. (2016). A randomized, controlled study of an online intervention to promote job satisfaction and well-being among physicians. Burnout Research, 3, 69–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2016.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. *Eaton C. (2015). The effects of heart math training on work engagement in a multi-national company. (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (ProQuest no 3728425).Google Scholar
  33. Ebert, D. D., Heber, E., Berking, M., Riper, H., Cuijpers, P., Funk, B., & Lehr, D. (2016a). Self-guided internet-based and mobile-based stress management for employees: Results of a random ised controlled trial. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 73, 315–323.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103269.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. *Ebert, D., Lehr, D., Heber, E., Riper, H., Cuijpers, P., & Berking, M. (2016b). Internet- and mobile-based stress management for employees with adherence-focused guidance: Efficacy and mechanism of change. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 42, 382–394.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. *Gordon, H. J., Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Bipp, T., & Verhagen, M. A. (2017). Individual job redesign: Job crafting interventions in healthcare. Journal of Vocational Behavior  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.07.002, 104, 98, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hakanan, J. J., & Roodt, G. (2010). Using the job demands-resources model to predict engagement: Analysing a conceptual model. In A. B. Bakker, & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and practice (pp. 85–101). Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  37. Halbesleben, J. R. B. (2010). A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout, demands, resources, and consequences. In A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 102–117). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268–279.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Heber, E., Ebert, D. D., Lehr, D., Nobis, S., Berking, M., & Riper, H. (2013). Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a web-based and mobile stress-management intervention for employees: Design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 13, 655–667.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. *Heber, E., Lehr, D., Ebert, D., Berking, M., & Riper, H. (2016). Web-based and Mobile stress management intervention for employees: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18, e21.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5112.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. *Hengel, K. M. O., Blatter, B. M., Joling, C. I., van der Beek, A. J., & Bongers, P. M. (2012). Effectiveness of an intervention at construction worksites on work engagement, social support, physical workload, and need for recovery: Results from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 4). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  43. *Imamura, K., Kawakami, N., Furukawa, T., Matsuyama, Y., Shimazu, A., & Umanodan, R., et al. (2015). Effects of an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention on improving work engagement and other work-related outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 578–584.  https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. *Imamura, K., Kawakami, N., Tsuno, K., Tsuchiya, M., Shimada, K., Namba, K., & Shimazu, A. (2017). Effects of web-based stress and depression literacy intervention on improving work engagement among workers with low work engagement: An analysis of secondary outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Occupational Health, 59, 46–54.  https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.16-0187-OA.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Jason, V., & Geetha, S. N. (2019). Regulatory focus and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement. Current Psychology, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00220-1.
  46. Jeanson, S., & Michinov, E. (2018). What is the key to researchers’ job satisfaction? One response is professional identification mediated by work engagement. Current Psychology, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9778-2.
  47. Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724.Google Scholar
  48. *Klatt, M., Norre, C., Reader, B., Yodice, L., & White, S. (2017). Mindfulness in motion: A mindfulness-based intervention to reduce stress and enhance quality of sleep in scandinavian employees. Mindfulness, 8, 481–488.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0621-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. *Kmiec, Jr., J. (2010). A study of the effectiveness of a pilot training program in an organizational setting: An intervention for work engagement (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (UMI no 3416289).Google Scholar
  50. Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2017a). Building work engagement: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 792–812.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. *Knight, C., Patterson, M., Dawson, J., & Brown, J. (2017b). Building and sustaining work engagement - a participatory action intervention to increase work engagement in nursing staff. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 634-649.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1336999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2019). Work engagement interventions can be effective: A systematic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28, 348–372.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. *Koncz, R., Wolfenden, F., Hassed, C., Chambers, R., Cohen, J., & Glozier, N. (2016). Mindfulness-based stress release program for university employees: A pilot, waitlist controlled trial and implementation replication. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58, 1021–1027.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000856.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. *Koolhaas, W., Groothoff, J., de Boer, M., van der Klink, J., & Brouwer, S. (2015) Effectiveness of a problem-solving based intervention to prolong the working life of ageing workers. BMC Public Health, 15, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1410-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Lerner, J. (2015). The impact of organizational development interventions on stress and engagement. (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (UMI no 3715877).Google Scholar
  56. *Liossis, P., Shochet, I., Millear, P., & Biggs, H. (2009). The promoting adult resilience (PAR) program: The effectiveness of the second, shorter pilot of a workplace prevention program. Behaviour Change, 26, 97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.26.2.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lupșa, D., Vîrgă, D., Maricuțoiu, L.P., & Rusu, A. (2019). Increasing Psychological Capital: A pre-registered meta-analysis of controlled interventions. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 1-50.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12219.
  58. Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mackay, M. M., Allen, J. A., & Landis, R. S. (2017). Investigating the incremental validity of employee engagement in the prediction of employee effectiveness: A meta-analytic path analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 108–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.03.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Maricuţoiu, L., Sava, F., & Butta, O. (2016). The effectiveness of controlled interventions on employees’ burnout: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89, 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maricuțoiu, L. P., Sulea, C., & Iancu, A. (2017). Work engagement or burnout: Which comes first? A meta-analysis of longitudinal evidence. Burnout Research, 5, 35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2017.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. (Eds.). (1997). The truth of burnout: How organisations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  63. Mastenbroek, N., van Beukelen, P., Demerouti, E., Scherpbier, A., & Jaarsma, A. (2015). Effects of a 1 year development programme for recently graduated veterinary professionals on personal and job resources: A combined quantitative and qualitative approach. BMC Veterinary Research, 11, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0627-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. *Meyers, M. C., & van Woerkom, M. (2017). Effects of a strengths intervention on general and work-related well-being: The mediating role of positive affect. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18, 671–689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9745-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Meyers, M., van Woerkom, M., & Bakker, A. (2013). The added value of the positive: A literature review of positive psychology interventions in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 618–632.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2012.694689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mills, M. R., Fleck, C., & Kozikowski, A. (2013). Positive psychology at work: A conceptual review, state-of-practice assessment, and a look ahead. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.776622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mitchell, J., Stanimirovic, R., Klein, B., & Vella-Brodrick, D. (2009). A randomized controlledtrial of a self-guided internet intervention promoting well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 749–760.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Group P (2009) preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. *Möltner, H., Leve, J., & Esch, T. (2018). Burnout-Prävention und mobile Achtsamkeit: Evaluation eines appbasierten Gesundheitstrainings bei Berufstätigen. Das Gesundheitswesen, 80, 295–300.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-114004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. *Naruse, T., Taguchi, A., Kuwahara, Y., Nagata, S., Sakai, M., Watai, I., & Murashima, S. (2014). The effect of skill mix in non-nursing assistants on work engagements among home visiting nurses in Japan. Journal of Nursing Management, 23, 532–541.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Nielsen, K., & Miraglia, M. (2017). What works for whom in which circumstances? On the need to move beyond the ‘what works?’ Question in organizational intervention research. Human Relations, 70, 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Oprea, B. T., Barzin, L., Vîrgă, D., Iliescu, D., & Rusu, A. (2019). Effectiveness of job crafting interventions: A meta-analysis and utility analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1646728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. O'Shea, D., O'Connell, B. H., & Gallagher, S. (2016). Randomized controlled trials in WOHP interventions: A review and guidelines for use. Applied Psychology, 65, 190–222.  https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. *Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P., & Schaufeli W. (2013a). On being grateful and kind: Results of two randomized controlled trials on study-related emotions and academic engagement. The Journal of Psychology, 148, 37–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.742854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. *Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P., & Schaufeli, W. (2013b). Do - it - yourself. Career Development International, 18, 173–195.  https://doi.org/10.1108/cdi-10-2012-0102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. *Ouweneel, E., Schaufeli, W., & Le Blanc, P. (2013c). Believe, and you will achieve: Changes over time in self-efficacy, engagement, and performance. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 5, 225–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Richardson, K., & Rothstein, H. (2008). Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 69–93.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.1.69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Rizzato, M. (2014). A brief online loving-kindness meditation intervention; effects on optimism and affect. Unpublished manuscript. Department of Psychology, Dublin Business School, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  79. Saks, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600–619.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315.  https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. *Schelvis, R. M., Wiezer, N. M., van der Beek, A. J., Twisk, J. W., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Hengel, K. M. O. (2017). The effect of an organizational level participatory intervention in secondary vocational education on work-related health outcomes: Results of a controlled trial. BMC Public Health, 17, 141–155.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4057-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W., Kamiyama, K., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Workaholism vs. Work Engagement: The Two Different Predictors of Future Well-being and Performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9410-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Shuck, B. (2011). Integrative literature review: Four emerging perspectives of employee engagement: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 10, 304–328.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484311410840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & Demerouti, E. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. In A. Bakker & M. Leiter (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 25–38). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  86. *Steidle, A., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., Hoppe, A., Michel, A., & O’shea, D. (2017). Energizing respites from work: A randomized controlled study on respite interventions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 650–662.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1348348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. *Stevens S. (2010). Understanding how employees unwind after work: Expanding the construct of "recovery". Saint Mary’s University. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
  88. *Strijk, J., Proper, K., van Mechelen, W., & van der Beek, A. (2012). Effectiveness of a worksite lifestyle intervention on vitality, work engagement, productivity, and sick leave: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 39, 66–75.  https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. *Umanodan, R., Shimazu, A., Minami, M., & Kawakami, N. (2014). Effects of computer-based stress management training on psychological well-being and work performance in japanese employees: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Industrial Health, 52, 480–491.  https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2013-0209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. *van Berkel, J., Boot, C. R., Proper, K. I., Bongers, P. M., & van der Beek, A. J. (2013). Process evaluation of a workplace health promotion intervention aimed at improving work engagement and energy balance. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55, 19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318269e5a6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. *van Berkel, J., Boot, C., Proper, K., Bongers, P., & van der Beek, A. (2014). Effectiveness of a worksite mindfulness-related multi-component health promotion intervention on work engagement and mental health: Results of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 9, e84118.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Van der Klink, J., Blonk, R., Schene, H., & Van Dijk, J. (2001). The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. *van Wingerden, J., Bakker, A., & Derks, D. (2016). A test of a job demands-resources intervention. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 686–701.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2014-0086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. *van Wingerden, J., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2017). The longitudinal impact of a job crafting intervention. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26, 107–119.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1224233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. *Verweij, H., Waumans, R. C., Smeijers, D., Lucassen, P. L., Donders, A. R. T., van der Horst, H. E., & Speckens, A. E. (2016). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for GPs: Results of a controlled mixed methods pilot study in Dutch primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 66, e99-e105.  https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X683497.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. *Viester, L., Verhagen, E., Bongers, P., & van der Beek, A. (2014). The effect of a health promotion intervention for construction workers on work-related outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled trial. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 88, 789–798.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-1007-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Vîrgă, D., Horga, A., & Iliescu, D. (2015). Work–life imbalance as a moderator in the relationship between resources and work engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 80–90.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. *Vuori, J., Toppinen-Tanner, S., & Mutanen, P. (2012). Effects of resource-building group intervention on career management and mental health in work organizations: Randomized controlled field trial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 273–286.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. *White, M., Wells, J., & Butterworth, T. (2014). The impact of a large-scale quality improvement programme on work engagement: Preliminary results from a national cross-sectional-survey of the ‘productive Ward’. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51, 1634–1643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. *Wilson, D. M. (2012). Effects of Mindfulness-Based Art Processing (MBAP) on the well-being and job performance of working adults: Evaluating a novel intervention (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (UMI no 3541745).Google Scholar
  101. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A., Heuven, E., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 345–356.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.13.4.345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWest University of TimişoaraTimisoaraRomania

Personalised recommendations