Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Classical Introspection Revisited: Implications of Research on Visual Imagery for the Functions of Pristine Inner Experience as Apprehended by Descriptive Experience Sampling

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Classical Introspection (CI) was the first formal scientific method to investigate conscious experience, but it fell into disrepute. Descriptive Experience Sampling (DES) has been proposed as a better method to capture naturally-occurring “pristine inner experience”, but the significance of this experience has not been systematically evaluated. This paper examines the functions of pristine inner experience on the basis of two questions that emerged from criticisms of CI: Can pristine inner experience access mental processes and can it affect behavior? Considering the most frequent form of pristine inner experience (inner seeing) from research on visual imagery, three conclusions are drawn: (a) Imagery and inner seeing do not provide direct knowledge about mental processes, (b) imagery and inner seeing do play a role in the determination of behavior, and (c) vividness of visual imagery is associated with behavior, but neither it or pristine inner seeing have causal effects because they have not been experimentally manipulated. This requirement poses challenges, and suggestions are made for nonexperimental research. It is concluded that DES is a better method than CI, but questions are raised about the time and effort that it requires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. C., & Buyer, L. S. (1994). Is imagery a functional component of the “Bizarre Imagery” phenomenon? The American Journal of Psychology, 107(2), 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 126–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1954). A reconsideration of the problem of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 105–118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Masicampo, E. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). Do conscious thoughts cause behavior? Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 331–361.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I. (1978). Imagery and organization in memory: Instructional effects. Memory & Cognition, 6(2), 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biron, J., & McKelvie, S. J. (1986). Effects of exposure time, interactive and separate imagery on recall of advertisements. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 18, 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. R., McCown, S., Lookadoo, R. L., Leonard, R. C., Kelley, M., DeCoster, J., Wayde, E., & Spence, S. A. (2012). Aging, imagery, and the bizarreness effect. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(5), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.639868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. A. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 169–189.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Both, S., Spiering, M., Everaerd, W., & Lam, E. (2004). Sexual behavior and responsiveness to sexual stimuli following laboratory-induced sexual arousal. The Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 242–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H. (1970). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 529–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. (1970). Comparison of associative learning strategies. Psychonomic Science, 20(2), 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, C. (1962). The concept of consciousness. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 229–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. C., Rice, H. J., Wooldridge, W. L., & Rubin D. C. (2016). Visual imagery in autobiographical memory: The role of repeated retrieval in shifting perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 237–253.

  • Callow, N., Roberts, R., & Fawkes, J. Z. (2006). Effects of dynamic and static imagery on vividness of imagery, skiing performance, and confidence. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0191.1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, A., & Pérez, J. (1988). Vividness of movement imagery questionnaire: Relations with other measures of mental imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 607–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, A., & Pérez, J. (1997). Mnemonic images and associated pair recall. Journal of Mental Imagery, 21(3&4), 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., Cavedon, A., Mazzoni, G., Giusberti, F., & Marucci, F. (1992). How can a vivid image be described? Characteristics influencing vividness judgments and the relationship between vividness and memory. Journal of Mental Imagery, 16(3&4), 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. H. (2012). Sport psychology: Concepts and applications (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Angiulli, A., Runge, M., Faulkner, A., Zakizadeh, J., Chan, A., & Morcos, S. (2013). Vividness of visual imagery and incidental recall of verbal cues, when phenomenological availability reflects long-term memory accessibility. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection resconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, J., & Everaerd, W. (1993). Imagery and sexual arousal. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 8(3), 283–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674659308404975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M. (1987). Individual imagery differences and prose processing. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 204–217). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulany, D. E. (2009). Psychology and the study of consciousness. In T. Bayne, A. Cleeremans, & P. Wilkins (Eds.), The Oxford companions to consciousness (p. 5400544). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 78–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.

  • Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., & Lackey, S. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(1), 137–146.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, E. (1982). Sexual behavior as related to sex fantasies and experimental manipulation of authoritarianism and creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(4), 853–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Englebert, M., & Carruthers, P. (2011). Descriptive experience sampling: What is it good for? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(1), 130–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during Experts' performance on representative tasks. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–241). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.013.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eton, D. T., Gilner, F. H., & Munz, D. C. (1998). The measurement of imagery vividness: A test of the reliability and validity of the vividness of visual imagery questionnaire and the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 22(3&4), 125–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1972). E.B. Titchener and his lost system. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 168–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feltz, D. L., & Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, W. A., & Byrne, D. (1978). Sex differences in response to erotica? Love versus lust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(2), 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbi, P., Jr., Long, D., Nolan, R., Shawley, S., Johnson, K., & Misra, R. (2017). Guided imagery targeting exercise, food cravings, and stress: A multi-modal randomized feasibility trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 41(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9876-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. D. (2010). Scientific objectivity and E. B. Titchener’s experimental psychology. Isis, 101, 697–721.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. L., & Knowlton, B. J. (2014). The role of visual imagery in autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition, 42(6), 922–934.

  • Gregersen, J., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Galanos, E., Comoutso, N., & Papaioannou, A. (2017). Countering the consequences of ego depletion: The effects of self-talk on selective attention. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 39(3), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. (2010). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grouios, G. (1992). The effect of mental practice on diving performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 23, 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, T. H., & Stolp, R. D. (1985). Effects of erotic guided imagery on female sexual arousal and emotional response. The Journal of Sex Research, 21(3), 292–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, G. (2015). Objectifying the phenomenal in experimental psychology: Titchener and beyond. Philosophia Scientiæ, 19(3), 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heavey, C. L., & Hurlburt, R. T. (2008). The phenomena of inner experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 798–810.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heavey, C. L., Hurlburt, R. T., & Lefforge, N. L. (2010). Descriptive experience sampling: A method for exploring momentary inner experience. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7, 345–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heavey, C. L., Hurlburt, R. T., & Lefforge, N. L. (2012). Towards a phenomenology of feelings. Emotion, 12(4), 763–777.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neurophysiological theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1958). A textbook of psychology. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1966). A textbook of psychology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1968). Concerning imagery. Psychological Review, 75, 46–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1969). In the mind’s eye. Psychology Today, 2(12), 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1972). A textbook of psychology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1974). What psychology is about. American Psychologist, 79(2), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O. (1980). Essay on mind. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebb, D. O., & Donderi, D. C. (1987). Textbook of psychology (4th ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Emotion and autobiographical memory. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(1), 88–131.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, G. (1951). Thinking. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T. (1997). Randomly sampling thinking in the natural environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(6), 941–949.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T. (2009). Iteratively apprehending inner experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10–12), 156–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T. (2018). On investigating inner experience: Contrasting Moore & Schwitzgebel and Browers et al. Consciousness and Cognition, 63, 146–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/l.concog.2008.06.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Akhter, S. A. (2006). The descriptive experience sampling method. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 271–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Akhter, D. A. (2008). Unsymbolized thinking. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/l.concog.2008.03.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2001). Telling what he know: Describing inner experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(9), 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2002). Interobserver reliability of descriptive experience sampling. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(1), 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2006). Exploring inner experience: The descriptive experience sampling method. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2011). Telling what we know: Describing inner experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Heavey, C. L. (2015). Investigating pristine inner experiences: Implications for experience sampling and questionnaires. Consciousness and Cognition, 31, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/l.concog.2014.11.02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2007). Life and mind: Philosophical issues in biology and psychology. In Describing inner experience? Proponent meets skeptic. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Koch, M., & Heavey, C. L. (2002). Descriptive experience sampling demonstrates the connection of thinking to externally observable behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Heavey, C. L., & Bensaheb, A. (2009). Sensory awareness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 16(10–12), 231–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Heavey, C. L., & Kelsey, J. M. (2013). Towards a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1477–1494. https://doi.org/10.1016/l.concog.2013.10.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Alderson-Day, B., Kühn, S., & Fernyhough, C. P. (2016). Exploring the ecological validity of thinking on demand: Neural correlates of elicited vs. spontaneously occurring inner speech. PLoS One, 11(2), e0147932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147932.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Alderson-Day, B., Fernyhough, C. P., & Kühn, S. (2017a). Can inner experience be apprehended in high videlity? Examining brain activation and experience from multiple perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Alderson-Day, B., Fernyhough, C. P., & Kühn, S. (2017b). Response commentary: Can inner experience be apprehended in high videlity? Examining brain activation and experience from multiple perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00628.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ironsmith, M., & Lutz, J. (1996). The effects of bizarreness and self-generation on mnemonic imagery. Journal of Mental Imagery, 20(3&4), 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, A. R. (1992). Mental practice – Does it work in the field? The Sport Psychologist, 6, 192–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, A. R., & Marks, D. F. (1994). Individual differences in mental imagery experience: Developmental changes and specialization. British Journal of Psychology, 85(4), 479–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, A. R., Marks, D. F., & Russell, D. G. (1986). An instrument for assessing imagery of movement. The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire. Journal of Mental Imagery, 10, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, D. G., & Schimpf, M. G. (1980). Self-generated images are more effective mnemonics. Journal of Mental Imagery, 4(2), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joynson, R. B. (1974). Psychology and commonsense. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, K., & Byrne, D. (1978). The function of imaginative fantasies in sexual behavior. Journal of Mental Imagery, 2, 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koukounas, E., & Over, R. (1997). Male sexual arousal elicited by film and fantasy matched in content. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, S., Fernyhough, C., Alderson-Day, B., & Hurlburt, R. T. (2014). Inner experience in the scanner: Can high fidelity apprehensions of inner experience be integrated with fMRI? Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01393.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, V. A. (1995). Relative association, interactiveness, and the bizarre imagery effect. The American Journal of Psychology, 108(1), 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapping-Carr, L. R., & Heavey, C. L. (2017). Pristine inner experience and descriptive experience sampling: Implications for psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, N. (2015). Effects of mental practice and physical practice on physical performance with drummers. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Vol 75(8-B(E)).

  • Marks, D. F. (1972). Individual differences in the vividness of visual imagery and their effect on function. In P. W. Sheehan (Ed.), The function and nature of imagery (pp. 83–108). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences and recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, D. F. (1999). Consciousness, mental imagery and action. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 567–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, S. J. (1995a). The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: A critical quantitative review and plea for direction. Journal of Mental Imag ery, 19(3&4), 1–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, S. J. (1995b). The VVIQ and beyond: Vividness and its measurement. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19(3&4), 197–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, S. J. (2007). Subjective experience and imagery, or how important is vividness: A critical appreciation of the work of Alan Richardson. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, S. J. (2018). Commentary: Can inner experience be apprehended in high fidelity? Examining brain activation and experience from multiple perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, S. J., & MacGregor, R. M. (1996). Effects of interactive pictures and ethnicity on recall of brand names. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 13, 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, S. J., Daprat, C., Monfette, P., & Cooper, D. (1993). Effects of pictorial interaction on recall of brand names and lower imagery nouns. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45, 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, C. (1996). The bizarre imagery effect on memory. Journal of Mental Imagery, 20(3&4), 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. M. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. T., & Schwitzgebel, E. (2018). Reply to Hurlburt. Consciousness and Cognition, 63, 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/l.concog.2008.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morokoff, P. J. (1985). Effects of sex guilt, repression, sexual “arousability,” and sexual experience on female sexual arousal during erotica and fantasy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., & White, B. B. (1980). Effects of committed or casual erotic guided imagery on females’ subjective sexual arousal and emotional response. The Journal of Sex Research, 16(4), 273–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias. (2002). Verbal reports on the contents of consciousness: Reconsidering introspectionist methodology. Psyche, 8(21), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbury, R., Hayter, M., Wylie, K. R., & Riddell, J. (2012). Sexual fantasy as a clinical intervention. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 27(4), 358–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processs. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2017). Chasing the rainbow: The non-conscious nature of being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01924.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, P., Muncie, S., & Simpson, D. (2012). The effects of imagery training on swimming performance : An applied investigation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 24, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200.2011.643442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przbla, D. P. J., Byrne, D., & Kelly, K. (1983). The role of imagery in sexual behavior. In A. A. Sheikh (ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application, pp. 436-467. New York: Wiley.

  • Richardson, A. (1965). The place of subjective experience in contemporary psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 56, 223–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1984). The experiential dimension of psychology. St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1994). Individual differences in imagery: Their measurement, organization, and consequences. New York, NY. Baywood.

  • Roberts, R., Callow, N., Hardy, L., Markland, D., & Bringer, J. (2008). Movement imagery ability: Development and assessment of a revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 200–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, M. S., Cheung, M. W.-L., & D’Angiulli, A. D. (2017). Meta-analytic comparison of trial-versus questionnaire-based vividness reportability across behavioral, cognitive and neural measurements of imagery. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix006.

  • Schlinger, H. D. (2017). Commentary: Can inner experience be apprehended in high fidelity? Examining brain activation and experience from multiple perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00360.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmolk, H., Buffalo, E. A., & Square, L. R. (2000). Memory distortions develop over time: Recollections of the O. J. Simpson trial verdict after 15 and 32 months. Psychological Science, 11(1), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). How well do we know our own conscious experience? The case of visual imagery. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2004). Introspective training apprehensively defended: Reflection on Titchener’s lab manual. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7-8, 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, A. A., & Jordan, C. S. (1983). Clinical uses of mental imagery. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application (pp. 391–435). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Over, R. (1987). Male sexual arousal as a function of the content and the vividness of erotic fantasy. Psychophysiology, 24(3), 334–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Over, R. (1990). Male sexual arousal as a function of the content and the vividness of erotic fantasy. Psychophysiology, 24(3), 334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strosahl, K. D., & Ascough, J. C. (1981). Clinical uses of mental imagery: Experimental foundations, theoretical misconceptions, and research issues. Psychological Bulletin, 89(3), 422–438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suinn, R. M. (1983). Imagery and sports. In A. A. Sheikh (Ed.), Imagery: Current theory, research, and application (pp. 507–534). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (2011). Time, experience, and descriptive experience sampling. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(1), 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, J., McKelvie, S. J., & Stout, D. (2007). Imagery vividness, spatial ability, and verbal memory in dancers compared to other athletes and non-athletes. Journal of Mental Imagery, 31(3&4), 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1912). The schema of introspection. American Psychologist, 23, 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokatlidis, O., & Over, R. (1995). Imagery, fantasy, and female sexual arousal. Australian Journal of Psychology, 47(2), 81–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raalte, J. L., Vincent, A., & Brewer, B. W. (2017). Self-talk interventions for athletes: A theoretically grounded approach. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action, 8(3), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/21520704.2016.1233921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walczyk, J. J. (1995). Between- versus within-subjects assessments of image vividness. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19(1&2), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Bishop’s University, 2600 College, Sherbrooke, QC, J1M 1Z7, Canada

    Stuart J. McKelvie

Authors
  1. Stuart J. McKelvie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart J. McKelvie.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent and Ethical Approval

No participants were tested for this paper.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Submission

This manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKelvie, S.J. Classical Introspection Revisited: Implications of Research on Visual Imagery for the Functions of Pristine Inner Experience as Apprehended by Descriptive Experience Sampling. Curr Psychol 40, 2427–2441 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00176-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00176-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation