Skip to main content
Log in

The autobiographical memory test: Differences in memory specificity across three recall elicitation methods

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most commonly used measure of autobiographical memory specificity is the Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT). There is substantial variability in the manner in which this test is administered. One such variation involves the format of memory recall (e.g., interview, handwritten, or computer-typed responses); uneven social and cognitive demands involved in each format likely influence memory performance, but links between elicitation context and memory quality have not been experimentally examined. This investigation explored the effect of retrieval context on memory specificity by randomly assigning 177 emerging adults to complete interview, handwritten, or computerized forms of the AMT. Results indicated a significant effect of retrieval context; those in the interview condition provided fewer autobiographical memories, fewer specific memories, and more overgeneral extended and categoric memories than did those in the computer and handwritten conditions. These effects were not explained by psychopathological symptoms or executive function abilities. Implications for models of autobiographical specificity are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah L. Bunnell.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) indicate no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bunnell, S.L., Legerski, JP. & Herting, N.R. The autobiographical memory test: Differences in memory specificity across three recall elicitation methods. Curr Psychol 39, 2298–2305 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9930-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9930-7

Keywords

Navigation