Advertisement

Experiencing Sweet Taste Affects Romantic Semantic Processing

  • Liusheng WangEmail author
  • Qian Chen
Article

Abstract

Studies have found that the perception of sweet taste can affect attitudes towards others, and promote the evaluation of intimate relationships. However, the effect of sweetness perception on romantic semantic processing remains unclear. The current study was to investigate whether the experiencing of sweet taste affects the processing of romantic words. Participants were randomly assigned to sweet taste and tasteless conditions, in which they performed a lexical decision task. The results showed the romantic advantage effect that participants in sweet taste condition processed romantic words more rapidly than processing non-romantic words. No gender difference was found on size of romantic advantage effect in sweet taste condition. These results support the embodied cognition hypothesis of romantic semantic processing.

Keywords

Embodied cognition Romantic advantage effect Sweet taste Semantic processing Metaphor 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Ministry of Education grants (11YJC1900025), and Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Universities of Jiangsu (2017ZDIXM134).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Author Liusheng Wang has received research grants from Ministry of Education, and Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Universities of Jiangsu. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author Liusheng Wang states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1995). Fear and the human amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience, 15(9), 5879–5891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. de Araujo, I. E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., & Hobden, P. (2003a). Representation of umami taste in the human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 313–319.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00669.2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. de Araujo, I. E. T., Kringelbach, M. L., Rolls, E. T., & McGlone, F. (2003b). Human cortical responses to water in the mouth, and the effects of thirst. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(3), 1865–1876.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00297.2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 637–660.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99532147.
  5. Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18(5/6), 513–562.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000026.
  6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2000). The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport, 11(17), 3829–3834.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartels, A., & Zeki, S. (2004). The neural correlates of maternal and romantic love. Neuroimage, 21(3), 1155–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan, K. Q., Tong, E. M., Tan, D. H., & Koh, A. H. (2013). What do love and jealousy taste like? Emotion, 13(6), 1142–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033758.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandler, J. J., Reinhard, D., & Schwarz, N. (2012). To judge a book by its weight you need to know its content: Knowledge moderates the use of embodied cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 948–952.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding, Y., Ji, T., & Chen, X. (2016). The way evaluation tastes: Tasting as an embodied cue of evaluation. Current Psychology, 35(3), 309–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9295-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engelen, J. A. A., Bouwmeester, S., de Bruin, A. B. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(4), 659–675.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.06.009.
  13. Fetterman, A. K., Robinson, M. D., Gordon, R. D., & Elliot, A. J. (2011). Anger as seeing red: Perceptual sources of evidence. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 311–316.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610390051.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fetterman, A. K., Robinson, M. D., & Meier, B. P. (2012). Anger as “seeing red”: Evidence for a perceptual association. Cognition & Emotion, 26(8), 1445–1458.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.673477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Filik, R., Christy, A. G., Hirsch, K. A., & Schlegel, R. J. (2016). Animal magnetism: Metaphoric cues alter perceptions of romantic partners and relationships. PLoS One, 11(5), e0155943.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foglia, L., & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science., 4, 319–325.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1226.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jay, T. B. (2003). The psychology of language. New Jersey: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  18. Kringelbach, M. L., de Araujo, I. E. T., & Rolls, E. T. (2004). Taste-related activity in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 21(2), 781–788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.063.
  19. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23(1), 155–184.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, S. W. S. (2016). Multimodal priming of abstract constructs. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 307–311.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 737–749.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, Q. (2008). Cognitive revolution and second-generation cognitive science[in Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40(12), 1306–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macht, M., & Dettmer, D. (2006). Everyday mood and emotions after eating a chocolate bar or an apple. Appetite, 46(3), 332–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Meier, B. P., Moeller, S. K., Riemer-Peltz, M., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 163–174.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Meteyard, L., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). The role of sensory and motor information in semantic representation: A review. In P. C. A. Gomila (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive science: An Embodied Approach (pp. 293–312). London: Academic Press, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Perrin, P. B., Heesacker, M., Tiegs, T. J., Swan, L. K., Lawrence, A. W., Smith, M. B., … Mejia-Millan, C. M. (2010). Aligning mars and venus: The social construction and instability of gender differences in romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 64(9–10), 613–628. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9804-4.
  28. Ren, D., Tan, K., Arriaga, X. B., & Chan, K. Q. (2014). Sweet love: The effects of sweet taste experience on romantic perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(7), 905–921.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514554512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robin, O., Rousmans, S., Dittmar, A., & Vernet-Maury, E. (2003). Gender influence on emotional responses to primary tastes. Physiology & Behavior, 78(3), 385–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00981-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Small, D. M. (2010). Taste representation in the human insula. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 551–561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0266-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tagiuri, R., & Petrullo, L. (1958). Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ulrich-Lai, Y. M., Ostrander, M. M., Thomas, I. M., Packard, B. A., Furay, A. R., Dolgas, C. M., & Herman, J. P. (2007). Daily limited access to sweetened drink attenuates hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenocortical axis stress responses. Endocrinology, 148(4), 1823–1834.  https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2006-1241.
  33. Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S. T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The neural representation of abstract words: The role of emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, L., & Yao, W. (2016). So near, so good: Does near-distance perception reduce interpersonal psychological distance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(6), 889–898.  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.6.889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, Y. N., Zhou, L. M., & Luo, Y. J. (2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese affective words system[in Chinese]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22(8), 608–612.Google Scholar
  36. Wellsby, M., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Developing embodied cognition: Insights from children's concepts and language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00506.
  37. Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu, X., & Wang, E. (2014). Power shifts attention on a vertical dimension: An ERP study[in Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(12), 1871–1879.  https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ye, H. (2010). Embodied cognition: A new approach in cognitive psychology[in Chinese]. Advances in Psychological Science, 18(5), 705–710.Google Scholar
  40. Yin, J. (2013). Research on gender differences in the perception of romance in college students[in Chinese]. Master's thesis, Southwest University.Google Scholar
  41. Zanolie, K., Dantzig, S. v., Boot, I., Wijnen, J., Schubert, T., Giessner, S., & Pecher, D. (2012). Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension. Brain and Cognition, 78(1), 50–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeki, S. (2007). The neurobiology of love. FEBS Letters, 581(14), 2575–2579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2007.03.094.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang, Q., & Zhang, B. (1997). Concreteness effects of two-character chinese words[in Chinese]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 29(2), 216–224.Google Scholar
  44. Zhang, W., He, X., Zhao, X., Lai, S., Lai, S., & Situ, S. (2018). The embodiment of beauty: Evidence from viewing Chinese concrete words and pictographs. International Journal of Psychology, 53(1), 66–76.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12269.
  45. Zhu, M., Liu, M., Du, Z., Liu, C., Wen, X., Zhang, Y., & Guo, L. (2012). The Influence of sweet and bitterness to pleasant and sad expression judgment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Conference on Psychology and Social Harmony(CPSH2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNantong UniversityNantong CityThe People’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations