Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of the Dark Triad traits in prisoner’s dilemma game

Current Psychology volume 39, pages 1055–1062 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

A standard way to create social dilemmas in the experimental laboratory is the prisoner dilemma game. In this environment, players are given an endowment of tokens and faced with a choice between cooperation and defection. In the present study a prisoner’s dilemma game was administrated to individuals (N = 280), along with measures of Dark Triad and impulsivity. Dark Triad variables were found to predict the likelihood of defection in the prisoner’s dilemma. Specifically, high levels of psychopathy coupled with high impulsivity may better describe a person who repeatedly attempts to extract defection. Defection was also more likely for individuals who scored higher on the Machiavellianism domain. Although Machiavellianism is also linked to higher defection, it has no association with impulsivity, but, rather, is associated with strategy and long-term planning. Interestingly, individuals high in narcissism with their entitlement and over-confidence had no significant effect on defection in such a game. Overall, the study suggests that two dark personality traits can be a significant predictor of behaviour in the prisoner’s dilemma.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Baker, F., & Rachlin, H. (2001). Probability of reciprocation in repeated prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Behavioural Decision Making, 14, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E. S., & Patton, J. H. (1983). Impulsivity: Cognitive, behavioral and psychophysiological correlates. In M. Zuckerman (Ed.), Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety (pp. 77–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A., Kramer, A., & Levy, O. (2008). Economic and hypothetical dictator game experiments: Incentive effects at the individual level. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1775–1784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone, C., De Brabander, B., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (1999). The impact of personality on behavior in five prisoner's dilemma games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(3), 343–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. N., Vazire, S., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2011). You probably think this paper's about you: Narcissists' perceptions of their personality and reputation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 185.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., DeJong, D., Forsythe, R., & Ross, T. (1996). Cooperation without reputation: Experimental evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior, 12(2), 187–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, O., Chesters, M. J., & Viding, E. (2011). The psychopath’s dilemma: The effects of psychopathic personality traits in one-shot games. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 804–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, L. L., & Ritter, E. (1976). Effects of contingencies on cooperative responding in a prisoner’s dilemma game with anticipated shock outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 51–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. D., & Trimm IV, R. F. (2008). On being eager and uninhibited: Narcissism and approach–avoidance motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 1004–1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., Richards, S. C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10-year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008). Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 217–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell, W. A., & Hartnagel, T. (1976). The impact of Machiavellianism and the trustfulness of the victim on laboratory theft. Sociometry, 39(2), 157–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. C., & Madden, G. J. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Extraversion, neuroticism, and the prisoner’s dilemma. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 254–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D., & Rasmusen, E. (1989). Cooperation in a repeated prisoners’ dilemma with ostracism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Jackson, C. J. (2016). The dark triad traits through the lens of reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 273–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The dark triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(4), 521–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Strosser, G. L., Kroll, C. H., Duineveld, J. J., & Baruffi, S. A. (2015). Valuing myself over others: The dark triad traits and moral and social values. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Learyc & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2011). The role of impulsivity in the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 679–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 922–931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., & Houser, D. (2001). Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods game. European Journal of Personality, 15(S1), S37–S52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards. Judgment and Decision making, 6(6), 552.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M. (2017). Testing the construct validity of the discounting inventory–psychometric properties of a polish and german samples. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(1), 118–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M., & Maczuga, M. (2017). Reliability of the discounting inventory: An extension into substance-use population. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 48(2), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016a). Dark side of impulsivity—Associations between the dark triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016b). The utility of the dark triad model in the prediction of the self-reported and behavioral risk-taking behaviors among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malesza, M., & Ostaszewski, P. (2017). Assessing individual differences in discounting: Construction and initial validation of the discounting inventory. Current Psychology, 1–13.

  • Mokros, A., Menner, B., Eisenbarth, H., Alpers, G. W., Lange, K. W., & Osterheider, M. (2008). Diminished cooperativeness of psychopaths in a prisoner’s dilemma game yields higher rewards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117(2), 406–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao, K., & Treas, J. (1994). Updating occupational prestige and socioeconomic scores: How the new measures measure up. Sociological Methodology, 24, 1–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner’s dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45(2), 159–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). Towards multifaceted machiavellianism: Content, factorial, and construct validity of a German Machiavellianism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F., & Kolar, G. P. (2012). How “dark” are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 884–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, B., Ortengren, A., Richards, J. B., & de Wit, H. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rilling, J. K., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Pagnoni, G., Goldsmith, D. R., Elfenbein, H. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Neural correlates of social cooperation and non-cooperation as a function of psychopathy. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 1260–1271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vazire, S., & Funder, D. C. (2006). Impulsivity and the self-defeating behavior of narcissists. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 154–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K.M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D.L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. Toronto: Presentation at the 111th annual convention of the American Psychological Association.

  • Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16(3), 293–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, R., Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2005). Relationship between cooperation in an iterated prisoner’s dilemma game and the discounting of hypothetical outcomes. Learning Behaviour, 33, 324–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Center in Poland (grant number: 2013/11/N/HS6/01149).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, OT Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany

    Marta Malesza

Authors
  1. Marta Malesza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Malesza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author Marta Malesza declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malesza, M. The effects of the Dark Triad traits in prisoner’s dilemma game. Curr Psychol 39, 1055–1062 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9823-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9823-9

Keywords

search

Navigation