Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is there a “Conformity to Feminine Norms” Construct? A Bifactor Analysis of two Short Versions of Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study extends the previous research on the structure of the Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory (CFNI-84) by applying the bifactor model. The CFNI was administered to a large sample of Spanish women. The Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (CFA) study in Spain supported the results obtained in the USA. A brief measure of the instrument (the CFNI-45r) is developed by eliminating the items which have a content overlap or non-salient factorial loading. With this brief version a competition took place among theoretically plausible models (the one-dimensional model, the one for independent factors, the one for correlated factors, the second-order one and the bifactor), and it was seen that the best fit was obtained from the bifactor model, that is, the existence of a general factor where the construct measured is developed. There is a discussion on the theoretical implications of this bifactor model which would support the original structure of the instrument with facets of the conformity to feminine norms which contribute to a general factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association (2007). Guidelines for psychological practice with girls and women. American Psychologist, 62, 949–979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.949.

  • Asún, R. A., Rodríguez-Navarro, K., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Developing multidimensional Likert scales using item factor analysis. The Case of Four-Point Items. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124114566716.

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.

  • Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D., & Campbell, S. M. (2002). Intimate relationships (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., & Mussap, A. J. (2007). Emotional reactions following exposure to idealized bodies predict unhealthy body change attitudes and behaviors in women and men. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.001.

  • Carver, C. S., Pozo-Kaderman, C., Price, A. A., Noriega, V., Harris, S. D., Derhagopian, R. P., et al. (1998). Concern about aspects of body image and adjustment to early stage breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 60, 168–174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J. P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 219–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-0367-x.

  • Chester, A., & Bretherton, D. (2001). What makes feminist counselling feminist? Feminism & Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353501011004006.

  • Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x.

  • DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the big five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4.

  • Eisler, R. M., & Skidmore, J. R. (1987). Masculine gender role stress: Scale development and component factors in the appraisal of stressful situations. Behavior Modification. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455870112001.

  • Fernández, J., Quiroga, M. A., del Olmo, I., & Rodríguez, A. (2007). Escalas de masculinidad y feminidad: Estado actual de la cuestión. Psicothema, 19, 357–365.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.878.

  • Frye, M. (1983). Oppression. In M. Frye (Ed.), The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory (pp. 1–16). Freedom: The Crossing Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Mina, A. (2003). Desarrollo del género en la feminidad y la masculinidad. Madrid: Narcea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, B. L., & Eisler, R. M. (1992). Development of the feminine gender role stress scale: A cognitive-behavioral measure of stress, appraisal, and coping for women. Behavior Modification. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455920163008.

  • Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177705148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (1995). Psicología de la mujer. La otra mitad de la experiencia humana. Madrid: Morata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E. (2001). Changing times, changing gender roles: Who do we want men and women to be? In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Psychology of women and gender (pp. 215–227). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., Hirsh, L., Celantano, E., Cozza, T., Hill, S., MacEcheron, M., et al. (1992). The male role: An investigation of contemporary norms. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R., Richmond, K., Cook, S., House, A. T., & Aupont, M. (2007). The femininity ideology scale: Factor structure, reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and social contextual variation. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9258-5.

  • Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemeter, M. A., Scott, R. P., & Gottfried, M. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.4.1.3.

  • Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. (2005a). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3709-7.

  • Mahalik, J. R., Talmadge, W. T., Locke, B. D., & Scott, R. P. (2005b). Using the conformity to masculine norms inventory to work with men in a clinical setting. Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20101.

  • Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741.

  • Murnen, S. K., & Byrne, D. (1991). Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499109551620.

  • Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis of the conformity to feminine norms inventory and development of an abbreviated version: The CFNI-45. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01545.x.

  • Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2011). An abbreviated tool for assessing feminine norm conformity: Psychometric properties of the conformity to feminine norms Inventory-45. Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024082.

  • Ponterotto, J. G., & Ruckdeschel, D. E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.105.3.997-1014.

  • Reise, S. P. (2012). The discovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555.

  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00239.

  • Sánchez-López, M. P., Cuéllar-Flores, I., Dresch, V., & Aparicio-García, M. E. (2009). Conformity to feminine norms in Spanish population. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.9.1171.

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the attitudes toward women scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329252.

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multinational study. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrell, J. (2001). Feminist interventions: Accountability beyond symptom reduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00033.

  • Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment II (Individual Differences and Work Psychology), Complutense University of Madrid, Campus of Somosaguas, s/n, 28223, Madrid, Spain

    Marta Evelia Aparicio-García

  2. Department of Methodology for Behavioral Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Jesús María Alvarado-Izquierdo

Authors
  1. Marta Evelia Aparicio-García
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jesús María Alvarado-Izquierdo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Evelia Aparicio-García.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

Author Marta Evelia Aparicio-García declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Jesús María Alvarado-Izquierdo declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aparicio-García, M.E., Alvarado-Izquierdo, J.M. Is there a “Conformity to Feminine Norms” Construct? A Bifactor Analysis of two Short Versions of Conformity to Feminine Norms Inventory. Curr Psychol 38, 1110–1120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9815-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9815-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation