Abstract
The misinformation effect occurs when a witness views an event, is exposed to misleading post-event information, and remembers some misleading details as having occurred in the original event. The present study examined the effect of receiving post-event information and being tested in different languages on bilingual participants’ susceptibility to the misinformation effect. English-Spanish bilingual participants (N = 234; 78% claimed English was their dominant language) watched a video, read a post-event narrative in English or in Spanish, and then were tested on details of the video in English or in Spanish. Regardless of the language in which participants read the post-event narrative, participants who were tested in English correctly recognized more true details and falsely recognized fewer misinformation details than those tested in Spanish. These results suggest that bilingual participants are more susceptible to the misinformation effect in their less proficient language, a finding that has important implications for interviewing bilingual witnesses. Even when witnesses claim to be fluent in two languages, testing their memory in their less fluent language may result in fewer true memories and more false memories.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anastasi, J. S., Rhodes, M. G., Marquez, S., & Velino, V. (2005). The incidence of false memories in native and non-native speakers. Memory, 13, 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000421
Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209454
Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Székely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., et al. (2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 344–380. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196494
Berk-Seligson, S. (2012). The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Green, D. W., & Gollan, T. H. (2009). Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 10, 89–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610387084
Cabeza, R., & Lennartson, E. R. (2005). False memory across languages: Implicit associative response vs fuzzy trace views. Memory, 13, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000161
Calvillo, D. P., & Parong, J. A. (2016). The misinformation effect is unrelated to the DRM effect with and without a DRM warning. Memory, 24, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1005633
Calvillo, D. P., Parong, J. A., Peralta, B., Ocampo, D., & Van Gundy, R. (2016). Sleep increases susceptibility to the misinformation effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 39, 1061–1067. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3259
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics. Memory & Cognition, 33, 770–782. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193073
Forgas, J. P., Laham, S. M., & Vargas, P. T. (2005). Mood effects on eyewitness memory: Affective influences on susceptibility to misinformation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 574–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.11.005
French, R. M., & Jacquet, M. (2004). Understanding bilingual memory: Models and data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.011
Graves, D. F., & Altarriba, J. (2014). False memories in bilingual speakers. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Foundations of bilingual memory (pp. 205–221). New York: Springer.
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Heredia, R. R., & Brown, J. M. (2013). Bilingual memory. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.), The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed., pp. 269–291). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Howe, M. L., Gagnon, N., & Thouas, L. (2008). Development of false memories in bilingual children and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.001
Hunt, E., & Agnoli, F. (1991). The Whorfian hypothesis: A cognitive psychology perspective. Psychological Review, 98, 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.377
Kawasaki-Miyaji, Y., Inoue, T., & Yama, H. (2003). Cross-linguistic false recognition: How do Japanese-dominant bilinguals process two languages: Japanese and English? Psychologia, 46, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2003.255
Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349–358. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473
Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
Marian, V., & Fausey, C. M. (2006). Language-dependent memory in bilingual learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1025–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1242
Marian, V., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). Language context guides memory content. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 925–933. https://doi.org/10.3875/BF03194123
Marian, V., & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.361
Marmolejo, G., Diliberto-Macaluso, K. A., & Altarriba, J. (2009). False memory in bilinguals: Does switching languages increase false memories? American Journal of Psychology, 122, 1–16.
Mitchell, K. J., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2001). Contextual overlap and eyewitness suggestibility. Memory & Cognition, 29, 616–626. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200462
Mortensen, L., Berntsen, D., & Bohn, O.-S. (2015). Retrieval of bilingual autobiographical memories: Effects of cue language and cue imageability. Memory, 23, 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.873809
Ost, J., Blank, H., Davies, J., Jones, G., Lambert, K., & Salmon, K. (2013). False memory ≠ false memory: DRM errors are unrelated to the misinformation effect. PLoS One, 8, e57939. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057939
Pu, X., & Tse, C.-S. (2014). The revised hierarchical model: Explicit and implicit memory. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Foundations of bilingual memory (pp. 147–184). New York: Springer.
Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
Ruffman, T., Rustin, C., Garnham, W., & Parkin, A. J. (2001). Source monitoring and false memories in children: Relation to certainty and executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2001.2632
Sahlin, B. H., Harding, M. G., & Seamon, J. G. (2005). When do false memories cross language boundaries in English-Spanish bilinguals? Memory & Cognition, 33, 1414–1421. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193374
Schrauf, R. W. (2000). Bilingual autobiographical memory: Experimental studies and clinical cases. Culture Psychology, 6, 387–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0064001
Schroeder, S. R., & Marian, V. (2012). A bilingual advantage for episodic memory in older adults. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24, 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.669367
Schroeder, S. R., & Marian, V. (2014). Bilingual episodic memory: How speaking two languages influences remembering. In R. R. Heredia & J. Altarriba (Eds.), Foundations of bilingual memory (pp. 111–132). New York: Springer.
Shaw, J. S., Garcia, L. A., & Robles, B. F. (1997). Cross-language postevent misinformation effects in Spanish-English bilingual witnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.889
Slobin, D. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Takarangi, M. K. T., Parker, S., & Garry, M. (2006). Modernising the misinformation effect: The development of a new stimulus set. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1209
Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Bouwmeester, S., & Camp, G. (2012). A short-term testing effect in cross-language recognition. Psychological Science, 23, 567–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435132
Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152
Zaragoza, M. S., Belli, R. F., & Payment, K. E. (2006). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 35–63). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., He, Q., Chen, C., Li, H., et al. (2010). Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Cognitive factors. Memory, 18, 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.487051
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., & Dong, Q. (2013). The relationship between DRM and misinformation false memories. Memory & Cognition, 41, 832–838. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0300-2
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Sarah Taylor, Andrea Flores, Julia Najd, and Katherine Gossett for assistance with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Dustin P. Calvillo declares that he has no conflict of interest. Nicole V. Mills declares that she has no conflict of interests.
Animal Studies and Human Participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on request.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLSX 82 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Calvillo, D.P., Mills, N.V. Bilingual witnesses are more susceptible to the misinformation effect in their less proficient language. Curr Psychol 39, 673–680 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9787-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9787-9