Skip to main content
Log in

Perceived goodness mediates the relationship between trait and state gratitude

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A grateful person could be said to have a lower threshold for gratitude and might feel more gratitude than others. However, both the value of gifts and the intention of helpers may be important determinations. This study aimed to examine the roles of perceived value and intention in the relationship between trait and state gratitude. Two hundred and forty-four Taiwanese individuals aged 20 or above completed measures of variables of interest. Structural equation modeling showed that goodness of value and intention naturally group together and form a unique appraisal belief (i.e., perceived goodness). Moreover, path analyses indicated that perceived goodness acted as a full mediator of the association between trait and state gratitude. In other words, people with higher levels of trait gratitude had a propensity to perceive greater value of the gift itself and the helper’s genuine helpful intentions, which may elevate their degree of state gratitude. Furthermore, a multigroup analysis found that the paths did not differ by gender. Implications for future research and limitations of the present findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8, 425–429.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5.0 update to the AMOS user’s guide. Chicago: Smallwaters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Bar-Zohar, Y., Greenberg, M. S., & Hermon, M. (1977). Reciprocity behavior in the elationship between donor and recipient and between harm-doer and victim. Sociometry, 40, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. Oxford: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bono, G., & McCullough, M. E. (2006). Positive responses to benefit and harm: Bringing forgiveness and gratitude into cognitive psychotherapy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 20, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. H., Chen, M.-Y., Kee, Y. H., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2009). Validation of the gratitude questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. Journal of Happiness Study, 10, 655–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 436–439). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. B. (2006). On gratitude. Social Justice Research, 19, 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, J. E., Johnson, M., & Lynch, A. M. (2002). Likableness, familiarity, and frequency of 844 person-descriptive words. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & Crumpler, C. A. (2000). Gratitude as human strength: Appraising the evidence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., McCullough, M. E., & Tsang, J. (2003). The assessment of gratitude. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models of measures (pp. 327–341). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Froh, J. J., Yurkewicz, C., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: Examining gender differences. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 633–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1988). Children's developing understanding of the motivational role of affect: An attributional analysis. Cognitive Development, 3, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harpham, E. J. (2004). Gratitude in the history of ideas. In R. A. Emmons & M. E. McCullough (Eds.), The psychology of gratitude (pp. 19–36). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Mishra, A., Breen, W. E., & Froh, J. J. (2009). Gender differences in gratitude: Examining appraisals, narratives, the willingness to express emotions, and changes in psychological needs. Journal of Personality, 77, 691–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J., & Anderson, N. H. (1976). Integration of intention and outcome in moral judgment. Memory and Cognition, 4, 1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In W. J. Arnold. In Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 175–270). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., & Kopecky, G. (1995). Masculinity, reconstructed. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, M. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2014). You didn’t have to do that: Belief in free will promotes gratitude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1423–1434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E. (2002). Savoring life, past and present: Explaining what hope and gratitude share in common. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 302–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. A. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Tsang, J.-A., & Emmons, R. A. (2004). Gratitude in intermediate affective terrain: Links of grateful moods to individual differences and daily emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 295–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., & Zanas, J. (1992). Gender, appraisal, and coping: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality, 60, 747–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosario, M., Shinn, M., Morch, H., & Huckabee, C. B. (1988). Gender differences in coping and social supports: Testing socialization and role constraint theories. Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S., & Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1997). Profiles of emotion-antecedent appraisal: Testing theoretical predictions across cultures. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 113–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A., Gatewood, R., & Driver, M. (1968). Some determinants of gratitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 233–236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toepfer, S. M., Cichy, K., & Peters, P. (2012). Letters of gratitude: Further evidence for author benefits. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, J.-A., Rowatt, W. C., & Buechsel, R. K. (2008). Exercising gratitude. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people (Vol. 2, pp. 37–53). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, P. C. (2014). Gratitude and the good life: Toward a psychology of appreciation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, P. C., Woodward, K., Stone, Y., & Kolts, R. L. (2003). Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Naragon-Gainey, K. (2010). On the specificity of positive emotional dysfunction in psychopathology: Evidence from the mood and anxiety disorders and schizophrenia/Schizotypy. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 839–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D. (1979). The cognition–emotion process in achievementrelated contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1211–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N., Dehaan, C. R., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Attributing autonomous versus introjected motivation to helpers and the recipient experience: Effects on gratitude, attitudes, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 418–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Stewart, N., Linley, P. A., & Joseph, S. (2008). A social-cognitive model of trait and state levels of gratitude. Emotion, 8, 281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 890-905.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China in Taiwan (Contract MOST 104–2410-H-027-020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Che Lin.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, CC. Perceived goodness mediates the relationship between trait and state gratitude. Curr Psychol 38, 1392–1398 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0076-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0076-4

Keywords

Navigation