The Social Salience of Students’ Sub-Clinical Psychopathic Personality

Satchell, Liam; Pearson, Dominic

doi:10.1007/s12144-017-9758-6

Published: 08 December 2017

The Social Salience of Students’ Sub-Clinical Psychopathic Personality

Current Psychology volume 39, pages 229–237 (2020)Cite this article

283 Accesses
1 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Abstract

We investigated the ability of undergraduate students to detect psychopathic personality traits in their new peers, after engaging in limited, naturalistic contact. Research has demonstrated that personality traits can be socially recognised in others. However, this research has not yet explored the recognition of psychopathic personality traits in newly encountered peers. This is important as some of these traits, such as manipulation, can have important social consequences in forming friendships. At the same time, manipulative tendencies only work best when not seen as such. To study the salience of psychopathic personality traits, undergraduate students (N = 101) took part in a round robin judgment paradigm during their orientation period of university. We found that participants were able to detect the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure’s traits of Boldness and Disinhibition but not Meanness in their groups, using typical social judgments. However, Meanness was the only trait that notably related to judges reporting that they would not make friends with targets who showed more psychopathic personality traits. These results highlight the importance of psychopathic personality traits when students form first impressions and intentions to make friends. Future research should consider the influence of ‘hidden’ meanness even in sub-clinical populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Notes

Typically, in interpersonal perception research the person being rated is referred to as a ‘target’ and the person rating the target is referred to as a ‘judge’.
Undergraduate students in the UK generally live in University owned accommodation (halls) or privately rented (shared) housing.
46.10% had spoken to each-other for the first time that week; 1.80% reported living with their target; and 2.00% reported speaking to the other person before university. 5.90% did not report.
The number of targets being judged did not change the value of accuracy by itself (all correlations between the eight accuracy values and number of targets judged were all smaller than r < .15). We do accept that varying numbers of judges affects variation in the r value calculations. To retain as much data as possible for analysis we keep all judges in this analysis.

References

Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(3), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.387.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., Dong, Q., Kenny, D. A., Fang, X., Winquist, L., & Yu, D. (1997). Cross-cultural consensus in personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.558.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Back, M. D., & Nestler, S. (2016). Judging personality. In J. A. Hall, M. Schmid Mast, & T. V. West (Eds.), The social psychology of perceiving others accurately. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism–popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016338.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Cooke, D. J., Michie, C., Hart, S. D., & Clark, D. A. (2004). Reconstructing psychopathy: Clarifying the significance of antisocial and socially deviant behavior in the diagnosis of psychopathic personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2004.18.4.337.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Fowler, K. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Patrick, C. J. (2009). Detecting psychopathy from thin slices of behavior. Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014938.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as others see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1980.tb02380.x.
Article Google Scholar
Funder, D. C. (Ed.). (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. London: Academic Press.
Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412445309.
Article Google Scholar
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2010). The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: Comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013635.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (1994). Psychopathy and the big 5: Correlations between observers' ratings of normal and pathological personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 8(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1994.8.1.32.
Article Google Scholar
Hirschmüller, S., Egloff, B., Schmukle, S. C., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2015). Accurate judgments of neuroticism at zero acquaintance: A question of relevance. Journal of Personality, 83(2), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12097.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., & Albright, L. (1987). Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.390.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the big five. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.245.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kolar, D. W., Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1996). Comparing the accuracy of personality judgments by the self and knowledgeable others. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 311–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00513.x.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and narcissism in the five-factor model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1571–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.016.
Article Google Scholar
Levesque, M. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1178–1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1178.
Article Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2007). Using a general model of personality to identify the basic elements of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.160.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Raine, A., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2005). Adolescent psychopathy and the big five: Results from two samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(4), 431–443.
Article Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1982). Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self-reports and ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 293–303.
Article Google Scholar
Miller, J. D., Jones, S. E., & Lynam, D. R. (2011). Psychopathic traits from the perspective of self and informant reports: Is there evidence for a lack of insight? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 758.
Article Google Scholar
Monin, B., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2005). Correlated averages vs. averaged correlations: Demonstrating the warm glow heuristic beyond aggregation. Social Cognition, 23(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2005.23.3.257.
Article Google Scholar
Patrick, C.J. (2010). Operationalizing the triarchic conceptualizationof psychopathy: Preliminary description of brief scales for assessment of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. Unpublished test manual, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. Test retrieved from https://www.phenxtoolkit.org/index.php?pageLink=browse.protocoldetails&id=121601.
Patrick, C. J., & Bernat, E. M. (2009). Neurobiology of psychopathy. Handbook of Neuroscience for the Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470478509.neubb002057.
Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21(03), 913. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579409000492.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Poy, R., Segarra, P., Esteller, À., López, R., & Moltó, J. (2014). FFM description of the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in men and women. Psychological Assessment, 26, 69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034642.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331.
Article Google Scholar
Schönbrodt, F. D., Back, M. D., & Schmukle, S. C. (2012). TripleR: An R package for social relations analyses based on round-robin designs. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 455–470.
Article Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., & Phillips, T. R. (2013). An examination of the triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy in incarcerated and nonincarcerated samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(1), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029306.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010a). Is criminal behavior a central component of psychopathy? Conceptual directions for resolving the debate. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0008512.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Skeem, J. L., & Cooke, D. J. (2010b). One measure does not a construct make: Directions toward reinvigorating psychopathy research—Reply to hare and Neumann (2010). Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 455–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014862.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Vaidyanathan, U., Hall, J. R., Patrick, C. J., & Bernat, E. M. (2011). Clarifying the role of defensive reactivity deficits in psychopathy and antisocial personality using startle reflex methodology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 253. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021224.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908.
Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Funding

This work received no grants or assistance from a funding body.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

School of Law and Criminology, University of West London, London, UK
Liam Satchell
Psychology Department, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry 1 Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK
Dominic Pearson

Authors

Liam Satchell
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dominic Pearson
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Satchell.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional Science Faculty Ethics Committee and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(XLSX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Satchell, L., Pearson, D. The Social Salience of Students’ Sub-Clinical Psychopathic Personality. Curr Psychol 39, 229–237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9758-6

Download citation

Published: 08 December 2017
Issue Date: February 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9758-6

Keywords

Psychopathic personality
Person judgment
Round Robin
Undergraduate student
Friendmaking