Real-time measurement of wise personality cognition: Evidence from mouse tracking
- 261 Downloads
There is no uniform definition of wisdom. In a psychological context, wisdom can be described as a comprehensive psychological trait integrating virtue and intelligence. Although the outcomes of wise personality characteristics have been studied, the temporal dynamics of real-time processing of wise personality remain elusive. In the current study, mouse tracking techniques were used to explore the cognitive dynamics of real-time processing of wise personality in two experiments. Study 1 showed that when participants were required to categorize wise and unwise characteristics in compatible and incompatible trials, the mouse trajectories showed a continuous spatial attraction toward the compatibility between wisdom and the wise characteristics. Further, in two dimensions of the wise personality, wisdom and the competence dimension were more closely linked. In Study 2, the mouse trajectories revealed that the connections among the different types of wisdom and between the two dimensions of wise personality were distinguished through the priming social categories. Natural wisdom showed a stronger connection with the competence dimension, whereas human wisdom showed a stronger tendency to be associated with the virtue dimension. The current study demonstrated that wisdom is the integration of virtue and competence and that competence can be regarded as the primary feature of wise individuals.
KeywordsWisdom Wise personality Types of wise individuals Mouse tracking Priming social categories
This research was supported by the key research center funding of Humanities & Social Science of Ministry of Education China (Grant No. 16JJD880026) and the funding of Humanities & Social Science of Ministry of Education China (Grant No. 12YJC90017).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ardelt, M., & Jeste, D. V. (2016). Wisdom and hard times: The ameliorating effect of wisdom on the negative association between adverse life events and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw137.
- Brezina, I. (2010). Folk conceptions of wise person’s personality in Asian cultures. Studia Psychologica, 52(4), 347–353.Google Scholar
- Chen, H. B. (2013). Empirical research on wisdom theory of integrating intelligence with morality. Doctoral dissertation: Nanjing Normal University.Google Scholar
- Chen, H. B., & Wang, F. Y. (2014). The experimental research on college students’ implicit cognition of wisdom. Psychological Development and Education, 30(4), 363–370.Google Scholar
- Chen, H. B., & Wang, F. Y. (2016). Human wisdom and natural wisdom: A classification based on wisdom-descriptive words and wisdom nominee. Psychological Exploration, 36(3), 203–210.Google Scholar
- Knight, A. J., & Parr, W. V. (1999). Age as a factor in judgments of wisdom and creativity. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 28(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
- Li, H. Q., & Wang, F. Y. (2017, in press). A three-dimensional model of the wise personality: A free classification perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(11). https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6691.
- Staudinger, U. M. (2013). The need to distinguish personal from general wisdom: A short history and empirical evidence. In M. Ferrari & N. M. Weststrate (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9231-1_1.Google Scholar
- Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Staudinger, U. M., Maciel, A. G., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). What predicts wisdom-related performance? A first look at personality, intelligence, and facilitative experiential contexts. European Journal of Personality, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199801/02)12:13.3.CO;2-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, F. Y., & Zheng, H. (2014). Theoretical exploration and application research of wisdom psychology. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
- Wang, F. Y., & Zheng, H. (2015). Morality and artificial intelligence integration: The essence and category of wisdom. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2015.03.019.Google Scholar
- Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., & Ardelt, M. (2016). The many faces of wisdom: An investigation of cultural-historical wisdom exemplars reveals practical, philosophical, and benevolent prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216638075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar