Advertisement

Real-time measurement of wise personality cognition: Evidence from mouse tracking

  • Haiqing Li
  • Fengyan Wang
Article
  • 261 Downloads

Abstract

There is no uniform definition of wisdom. In a psychological context, wisdom can be described as a comprehensive psychological trait integrating virtue and intelligence. Although the outcomes of wise personality characteristics have been studied, the temporal dynamics of real-time processing of wise personality remain elusive. In the current study, mouse tracking techniques were used to explore the cognitive dynamics of real-time processing of wise personality in two experiments. Study 1 showed that when participants were required to categorize wise and unwise characteristics in compatible and incompatible trials, the mouse trajectories showed a continuous spatial attraction toward the compatibility between wisdom and the wise characteristics. Further, in two dimensions of the wise personality, wisdom and the competence dimension were more closely linked. In Study 2, the mouse trajectories revealed that the connections among the different types of wisdom and between the two dimensions of wise personality were distinguished through the priming social categories. Natural wisdom showed a stronger connection with the competence dimension, whereas human wisdom showed a stronger tendency to be associated with the virtue dimension. The current study demonstrated that wisdom is the integration of virtue and competence and that competence can be regarded as the primary feature of wise individuals.

Keywords

Wisdom Wise personality Types of wise individuals Mouse tracking Priming social categories 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the key research center funding of Humanities & Social Science of Ministry of Education China (Grant No. 16JJD880026) and the funding of Humanities & Social Science of Ministry of Education China (Grant No. 12YJC90017).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest to this work.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25(3), 275–324.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503251764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardelt, M. (2004). Wisdom as expert knowledge system: A critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept. Human Development, 47(5), 257–285.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000079154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardelt, M. (2011). The measurement of wisdom: A commentary on Taylor, Bates, and Webster’s comparison of the SAWS and 3D-WS. Experimental Aging Research, 37(2), 241–255.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2011.554509.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardelt, M., & Jeste, D. V. (2016). Wisdom and hard times: The ameliorating effect of wisdom on the negative association between adverse life events and well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw137.
  5. Bangen, K. J., Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(12), 1254–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bluck, S., & Glück, J. (2005). From the inside out: People’s implicit theories of wisdom. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Jordan (Eds.), A handbook of wisdom: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 84–109). New York: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610486.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brezina, I. (2010). Folk conceptions of wise person’s personality in Asian cultures. Studia Psychologica, 52(4), 347–353.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, H. B. (2013). Empirical research on wisdom theory of integrating intelligence with morality. Doctoral dissertation: Nanjing Normal University.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, H. B., & Wang, F. Y. (2014). The experimental research on college students’ implicit cognition of wisdom. Psychological Development and Education, 30(4), 363–370.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, H. B., & Wang, F. Y. (2016). Human wisdom and natural wisdom: A classification based on wisdom-descriptive words and wisdom nominee. Psychological Exploration, 36(3), 203–210.Google Scholar
  11. Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. F. (2005). Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action. Neuron, 45(5), 801–814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1183–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9280.2009.02422.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, J., & Ambady, N. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118(2), 247–279.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, J. B., Ambady, N., Midgley, K. J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2011a). The real-time link between person perception and action: Brain potential evidence for dynamic continuity. Social Neuroscience, 6(2), 139–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.490674.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, J., Dale, R., & Farmer, T. (2011b). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 59–65.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Glück, J., Bluck, S., Baron, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2005). The wisdom of experience: Autobiographical narratives across adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(3), 197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossmann, I., Na, J., Varnum, M. E., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2013). A route to well-being. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 944–953.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hehman, E., Stolier, R. M., & Freeman, J. B. (2015). Advanced mouse tracking analytic techniques for enhancing psychological science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(3), 384–401.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214538325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeste, D. V., Ardelt, M., Blazer, D., Kraemer, H. C., Vaillant, G., & Meeks, T. W. (2010). Expert consensus on characteristics of wisdom: A Delphi method study. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 668–680.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq022.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, K. L., Freeman, J. B., & Pauker, K. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 116–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 774–788.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawakami, K., Young, H., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Automatic stereotyping: Category, trait, and behavioral activations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(1), 3–15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202281001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knight, A. J., & Parr, W. V. (1999). Age as a factor in judgments of wisdom and creativity. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 28(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
  25. Küpers, W. (2013). Phronesis as professional knowledge: Practical wisdom in the professions. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 313–314.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, S., Choun, S., Aldwin, C. M., & Levenson, M. R. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of self-transcendent wisdom between the United States and Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 30(2), 143–161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-015-9259-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., & Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 60, 127–143.  https://doi.org/10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, H. Q., & Wang, F. Y. (2017, in press). A three-dimensional model of the wise personality: A free classification perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(11).  https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6691.
  29. Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2009). Neurobiology of wisdom: A literature overview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(4), 355–365.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Morett, L. M., & Macwhinney, B. (2013). Syntactic transfer in English-speaking Spanish learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(1), 132–151.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orwoll, L., & Perlmutter, M. (1990). The study of wise persons: Integrating a personality perspective. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 160–177). New York: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173704.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Owens, J. E., Menard, M., Plews-Ogan, M., Calhoun, L. G., & Ardelt, M. (2016). Stories of growth and wisdom: A mixed-methods study of people living well with pain. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 5(1), 16–28.  https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2015.065.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Redzanowski, U., & Glück, J. (2013). Who knows who is wise? Self and peer ratings of wisdom. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(3), 391–394.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2005). The Cinderella of psychology: The neglect of motor control in the science of mental life and behavior. American Psychologist, 60(4), 308–317.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.4.308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanders, J. D., & Jeste, D. V. (2013). Neurobiological basis of personal wisdom. In M. Ferrari & N. M. Weststrate (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom (pp. 99–112). New York: Springer Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9231-1_5.Google Scholar
  36. Song, J. H., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Hidden cognitive states revealed in choice reaching tasks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 360–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Staudinger, U. M. (2013). The need to distinguish personal from general wisdom: A short history and empirical evidence. In M. Ferrari & N. M. Weststrate (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9231-1_1.Google Scholar
  38. Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131659.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Staudinger, U. M., Maciel, A. G., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). What predicts wisdom-related performance? A first look at personality, intelligence, and facilitative experiential contexts. European Journal of Personality, 12(1), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199801/02)12:13.3.CO;2-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 347–365.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.4.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Takahashi, M., & Bordia, P. (2000). The concept of wisdom: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 35(1), 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas, M. L., Bangen, K. J., Ardelt, M., & Jeste, D. V. (2015). Development of a 12-item abbreviated three-dimensional wisdom scale (3D-WS-12) item selection and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(1), 71–82.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115595714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, F. Y., & Zheng, H. (2014). Theoretical exploration and application research of wisdom psychology. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
  44. Wang, F. Y., & Zheng, H. (2015). Morality and artificial intelligence integration: The essence and category of wisdom. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 127–133.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-8263.2015.03.019.Google Scholar
  45. Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., & Ardelt, M. (2016). The many faces of wisdom: An investigation of cultural-historical wisdom exemplars reveals practical, philosophical, and benevolent prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(5), 662–676.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216638075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang, S. Y. (2008). A process view of wisdom. Journal of Adult Development, 15(2), 62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9037-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang, S. Y. (2013). From personal striving to positive influences. In M. Ferrari & N. M. Weststrate (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom (pp. 115–135). New York: Springer Netherlands.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7987-7_6.Google Scholar
  48. Yu, Z., Wang, F., Wang, D., & Bastin, M. (2012). Beyond reaction times: Incorporating mouse tracking measures into the implicit association test to examine its underlying process. Social Cognition, 30(3), 289–306.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.3.289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Moral Education ResearchNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.School of PsychologyNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyQufu Normal UniversityQufuChina

Personalised recommendations