Skip to main content

Autonomy-supportive behaviors promote autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, motor skills learning and performance in physical education

Current Psychology volume 38, pages 1692–1705 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

Previous research provides evidence as to the influence of teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors on students’ autonomous motivation in physical education (PE). However, few studies have considered the impact of teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors on enhancing knowledge structures and motor skills learning in PE. The present study investigated whether an autonomy-supportive intervention designed to promote motor skills learning (experimental group), compared with conventional teaching (control group), would increase autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, skill learning, and performance and whether it decrease controlled motivation in students over a semester. Twenty-eight PE students participated in this quasi-experimental study. Badminton skills were assessed in pre and post intervention and retention sessions. Motivational regulations and knowledge structures were measured in pre and post intervention. In a session after the retention, game performance was measured on the transfer test. Overall, the experimental group and the hypothesized process model were supported. The experimental group demonstrated greater mean scores in some skills in post and retention tests. Compared to students in the control group, students in the experimental group reported greater autonomous motivation and game performance in the post-test. Furthermore, knowledge structures in both groups improved. Promoting skill learning in an autonomy-supportive way, compared with conventional teaching, has important practical implications for PE programs. We conclude that the intervention was successful in enhancing students’ autonomous motivation and performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Abernethy, B., Thomas, K. T., & Thomas, J. R. (1993). Strategies of improving understanding of motor expertise. In J. L. Starkes & F. Allard (Eds.), Cognitive issues in motor expertise (pp. 317–356). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2012). Students' Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Engagement as a Function of Between-Class and Between-Student Differences in Motivation Toward Physical Education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34(4), 457–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem situations. Psychological Review, 94(2), 192–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anson, G., Elliott, D., & Davids, K. (2005). Information processing and constraints-based views of skill acquisition: divergent or complementary? Motor Control, 9(3), 217–241.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arias, A. G., Arroyo, M. P. M., Domínquez, A. M., García-González, L., & Álvarez, F. D. V. (2011). La práctica federada como elemento de desarrollo del conocimiento: aplicación al voleibol de formación.(The federated practice as element of development of the knowledge: application to the formation volleyball). RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 7(24), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behzadnia, B., Ahmadi, M., & Amani, J. (2017). The factorial structure of the self-regulation questionnaire in college physical education classes (SRQ-PE). Research on Sport Management and Motor Behavior, Article in press.

  • Behzadnia, B., & Deci, E.L. (2017). Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Positive Physical-Education Outcomes Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary Meeting of the Society for the Study of Motivation, Boston.

  • Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2013). Do the benefits from autonomy-supportive PE teacher training programs endure?: A one-year follow-up investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(4), 508–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students' amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Moon, I. S. (2012). Experimentally based, longitudinally designed, teacher-focused intervention to help physical education teachers be more autonomy supportive toward their students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(3), 365–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y. G. (2016). A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students' amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need frustration. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Button, C. (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: an introduction. Florence: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D., & Passos, P. (2011). Nonlinear pedagogy: Learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. Y., Renshaw, I., Button, C., Davids, K., & Tan, C. W. K. (2013). Effective Learning Design for the Individual: A Nonlinear Pedagogical Approach in Physical Education. In O. Ovens, T. Hopper, & J. Butler (Eds.), Complexity Thinking in Physical Education: Reframing Curriculum, Pedagogy and Research (pp. 121–134). Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cothran, D. J., Kulinna, P. H., Banville, D., Choi, E., Amade-Escot, C., MacPhail, A., et al. (2005). A cross-cultural investigation of the use of teaching styles. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), 193–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davids, K. (2012). Learning design for nonlinear dynamical movement systems. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davids, K., Bennett, S.J., & Newell, K.M. (2006). Movement system variability: Human kinetics.

  • Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S.J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach: Human Kinetics.

  • Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E.L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do: the dynamics of personal autonomy. GP Putnam's Sons.

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965pli1104_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology-Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Villar, F., Iglesias, D., Moreno, M. P., Fuentes, J. P., & Cervelló, E. M. (2004). An investigation into procedural knowledge and decision-making: Spanish experienced-inexperienced basketball players differences. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 46, 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, K. E., & Thomas, J. R. (1987). The relation of knowledge development to children's basketball performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, W., Rink, T., & Hussey. (1996). The effects of a 3-week unit of tactical, skill or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15(4), 418–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Boston: Houghton-Mifihin.

  • Gréhaigne, J., Richard, J., & Griffin, L.L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games: Psychology Press.

  • Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handford, C., Davids, K., Bennett, S., & Button, C. (1997). Skill acquisition in sport: Some applications of an evolving practice ecology. Journal of Sports Sciences, 15(6), 621–640.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hooyman, A., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2014). Impacts of autonomy-supportive versus controlling instructional language on motor learning. Human Movement Science, 36, 190–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, T., Butler, J., & Storey, B. (2009). TGfU-Simply good pedagogy: Understanding a complex challenge: PHE Canada.

  • Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016a). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016b). A New Autonomy-Supportive Way of Teaching That Increases Conceptual Learning: Teaching in Students' Preferred Ways. Journal of Experimental Education, 84(4), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1083522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. L., & Nelson, J. K. (1986). Practical Measurements for evaluation in physical education (4th ed.). Minneapolis: Burgess.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior The MIT Press. Cambridge: Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshtidar, M., & Behzadnia, B. (2017). Prediction of intention to continue sport in athlete students: A self-determination theory approach. PLoS One, 12(2), e0171673.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koestner, R., Ryan, R. M., Bernieri, F., & Holt, K. (1984). Setting limits on children's behavior: The differential effects of controlling vs. informational styles on intrinsic motivation and creativity. Journal of Personality, 52(3), 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. C., Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., Tan, C. W., & Button, C. (2014). Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill. PLoS One, 9(8), e104744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., & Wulf, G. (2015). Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1383–1388. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, R., & Farrow, A. (1987). Test questions for Physical Education Activities. Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, S. L., & Thomas, J. R. (1989). Relation of knowledge and performance in boys' tennis: age and expertise. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 48(2), 190–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (2006). An investigation of tactical transfer in net games. European Journal of Physical Education, 4(2), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1740898990040205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouratidis, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Sideridis, G. (2008). The motivating role of positive feedback in sport and physical education: evidence for a motivational model. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(2), 240–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2015). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 21(5), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1072506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341–360). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 231–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2016). Teachers become more autonomy supportive after they believe it is easy to do. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 178–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26(3), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021711629417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., ... & Wang, C. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93–110.

  • Renshaw, I., Davids, K., & Savelsbergh, G.J.P. (2010). Motor learning in practice: A constraints-led approach: Routledge.

  • Renshaw, I., Oldham, A. R., & Bawden, M. (2012). Nonlinear pedagogy underpins intrinsic motivation in sports coaching. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5, 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologists, 55(1), 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R. J., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: a 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R.A., & Lee, T.D. (2011). Motor control: a behavioral emphasis: Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.

  • Seifert, L., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2013). Key properties of expert movement systems in sport : an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Medicine, 43(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0011-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seifert, L., Wattebled, L., Herault, R., Poizat, G., Ade, D., Gal-Petitfaux, N., & Davids, K. (2014). Neurobiological degeneracy and affordance perception support functional intra-individual variability of inter-limb coordination during ice climbing. PLoS One, 9(2), e89865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soenens, B., Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Dochy, F., & Goossens, L. (2012). Psychologically Controlling Teaching: Examining Outcomes, Antecedents, and Mediators. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., Standage, M., & Spray, C. M. (2010). Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: A multilevel linear growth analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(1), 99–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action: MIT press.

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. K. J., Morin, A. J., Ryan, R. M., & Liu, W. C. (2016). Students’ motivational profiles in the physical education context. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(6), 612–630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. P. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2003). Perceptual expertise in sport: Development. In A. Ericsson & J. Starkes (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 220–249). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuest, D. A., & Bucher, C. A. (1999). Foundation of physical education and sports (13th ed.). Boston: William C Brown Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not funded by any Institution or Company.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Motor Behaviour, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, 11km SERO Road, Urmia, West Azerbaijan, 5756151818, Iran

    Behzad Behzadnia & Hasan Mohammadzadeh

  2. Department of Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Urmia Branch, Urmia, West Azerbaijan, Iran

    Malek Ahmadi

Authors
  1. Behzad Behzadnia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hasan Mohammadzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Malek Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Behzad Behzadnia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Behzad Behzadnia declares that he has no conflict of interest. Hasan Mohammadzaded declares that he has no conflict of interest. Malek Ahmadi declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal Studies

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Behzadnia, B., Mohammadzadeh, H. & Ahmadi, M. Autonomy-supportive behaviors promote autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, motor skills learning and performance in physical education. Curr Psychol 38, 1692–1705 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9727-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9727-0

Keywords

  • Autonomy-support
  • Self-determination theory
  • Constraints-led approach
  • Skill learning
  • Game play performance