Autonomy-supportive behaviors promote autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, motor skills learning and performance in physical education
Previous research provides evidence as to the influence of teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors on students’ autonomous motivation in physical education (PE). However, few studies have considered the impact of teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors on enhancing knowledge structures and motor skills learning in PE. The present study investigated whether an autonomy-supportive intervention designed to promote motor skills learning (experimental group), compared with conventional teaching (control group), would increase autonomous motivation, knowledge structures, skill learning, and performance and whether it decrease controlled motivation in students over a semester. Twenty-eight PE students participated in this quasi-experimental study. Badminton skills were assessed in pre and post intervention and retention sessions. Motivational regulations and knowledge structures were measured in pre and post intervention. In a session after the retention, game performance was measured on the transfer test. Overall, the experimental group and the hypothesized process model were supported. The experimental group demonstrated greater mean scores in some skills in post and retention tests. Compared to students in the control group, students in the experimental group reported greater autonomous motivation and game performance in the post-test. Furthermore, knowledge structures in both groups improved. Promoting skill learning in an autonomy-supportive way, compared with conventional teaching, has important practical implications for PE programs. We conclude that the intervention was successful in enhancing students’ autonomous motivation and performance.
KeywordsAutonomy-support Self-determination theory Constraints-led approach Skill learning Game play performance
This study was not funded by any Institution or Company.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Behzad Behzadnia declares that he has no conflict of interest. Hasan Mohammadzaded declares that he has no conflict of interest. Malek Ahmadi declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Van Keer, H., Van den Berghe, L., De Meyer, J., & Haerens, L. (2012). Students' Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Engagement as a Function of Between-Class and Between-Student Differences in Motivation Toward Physical Education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34(4), 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arias, A. G., Arroyo, M. P. M., Domínquez, A. M., García-González, L., & Álvarez, F. D. V. (2011). La práctica federada como elemento de desarrollo del conocimiento: aplicación al voleibol de formación.(The federated practice as element of development of the knowledge: application to the formation volleyball). RICYDE. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte, 7(24), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.5232/ricyde.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Behzadnia, B., Ahmadi, M., & Amani, J. (2017). The factorial structure of the self-regulation questionnaire in college physical education classes (SRQ-PE). Research on Sport Management and Motor Behavior, Article in press.Google Scholar
- Behzadnia, B., & Deci, E.L. (2017). Teachers’ Autonomy Support and Positive Physical-Education Outcomes Paper presented at the 10th Anniversary Meeting of the Society for the Study of Motivation, Boston.Google Scholar
- Cheon, S. H., Reeve, J., & Song, Y. G. (2016). A teacher-focused intervention to decrease PE students' amotivation by increasing need satisfaction and decreasing need frustration. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 38(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Button, C. (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: an introduction. Florence: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chow, J. Y., Renshaw, I., Button, C., Davids, K., & Tan, C. W. K. (2013). Effective Learning Design for the Individual: A Nonlinear Pedagogical Approach in Physical Education. In O. Ovens, T. Hopper, & J. Butler (Eds.), Complexity Thinking in Physical Education: Reframing Curriculum, Pedagogy and Research (pp. 121–134). Routledge: London.Google Scholar
- Davids, K., Bennett, S.J., & Newell, K.M. (2006). Movement system variability: Human kinetics.Google Scholar
- Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S.J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Deci, E.L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do: the dynamics of personal autonomy. GP Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
- Del Villar, F., Iglesias, D., Moreno, M. P., Fuentes, J. P., & Cervelló, E. M. (2004). An investigation into procedural knowledge and decision-making: Spanish experienced-inexperienced basketball players differences. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 46, 407–420.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Boston: Houghton-Mifihin.Google Scholar
- Gréhaigne, J., Richard, J., & Griffin, L.L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students' motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hopper, T., Butler, J., & Storey, B. (2009). TGfU-Simply good pedagogy: Understanding a complex challenge: PHE Canada.Google Scholar
- Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2016a). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: A self-determination theory dual-process model. Learning and Instruction, 43, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, B. L., & Nelson, J. K. (1986). Practical Measurements for evaluation in physical education (4th ed.). Minneapolis: Burgess.Google Scholar
- Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior The MIT Press. Cambridge: Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- McGee, R., & Farrow, A. (1987). Test questions for Physical Education Activities. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S. H., Jang, H., ... & Wang, C. J. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93–110.Google Scholar
- Renshaw, I., Davids, K., & Savelsbergh, G.J.P. (2010). Motor learning in practice: A constraints-led approach: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, R.A., & Lee, T.D. (2011). Motor control: a behavioral emphasis: Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Seifert, L., Wattebled, L., Herault, R., Poizat, G., Ade, D., Gal-Petitfaux, N., & Davids, K. (2014). Neurobiological degeneracy and affordance perception support functional intra-individual variability of inter-limb coordination during ice climbing. PLoS One, 9(2), e89865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089865.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., Standage, M., & Spray, C. M. (2010). Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: A multilevel linear growth analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(1), 99–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action: MIT press.Google Scholar
- Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williams, A. M., Davids, K., & Williams, J. G. P. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2003). Perceptual expertise in sport: Development. In A. Ericsson & J. Starkes (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 220–249). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
- Wuest, D. A., & Bucher, C. A. (1999). Foundation of physical education and sports (13th ed.). Boston: William C Brown Pub.Google Scholar