Assessing dispositions towards ridicule and being laughed at: Development and initial validation of the Turkish PhoPhiKat-45
How people deal with humor and laughter is culturally constructed within a society but each member may differ in their attitudes. Depending upon this, this study aimed to test the factor structure of PhoPhiKat-45 (Ruch and Proyer Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 183–212, 2009a) which is a subjective measurement designed to assess three dispositions toward laughter and ridicule; gelotophobia (fear of being laughed at), gelotophilia (joy of being laughed at), and katagelasticism (joy of laughing at others), taking samples from two universities in Turkey (N = 628; female = 470). We further examined the relationships between humor styles, self-esteem, and psychological symptomatology with the PhoPhiKat-45. Confirmatory factor analyses replicated the original 3-factor model and internal consistencies of derived subscales were satisfactory (.76 for gelotophobia, .79 for gelotophilia, .66 for katagelasticism). For the nomological validity, bivariate correlations and regression analyses showed that gelotophobia was associated with low self-esteem, greater levels of psychological distress (mainly concerning interpersonal relations), and social and coping functions of humor. Gelotophilia was associated with all forms of humor, had no relation to self-esteem or any kind of psychological distress. Katagelasticism (i.e., enjoying laughing at others) was associated with all dimensions of psychological distress and only with an aggressive style of humor. In conclusion, the findings showed that the Turkish PhoPhiKat-43 scale has a satisfactory construct validity and reliability instrument to assess the dispositions toward laughter and ridicule.
KeywordsGelotophilia Gelotophobia Humor Katagelasticism PhoPhiKat-45 Self-esteem
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interests
Authors have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bentler, P. M. (1985). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
- Carretero-Dios, H., Ruch, W., Agudelo, D., Platt, T., & Proyer, R. T. (2010). Fear of being laughed at and social anxiety: A preliminary psychometric study. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 108–124.Google Scholar
- Chen, H. C., Chan, Y. C., Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2013). Being laughed at and laughing at others in Taiwan and Switzerland: A cross-cultural perspective. In J. R. M. Davis & J. V. Chey (Eds.), Modern and contemporary approaches to humour in China. Vol. 2 of humour in Chinese life and letters (pp. 215–229). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
- Clarke, I. (2000). Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(1), 137.Google Scholar
- Çuhadaroğlu, F. (1986). Adolesanlarda benlik saygısı [Self-esteem in adolescents]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara: Hacettepe University.Google Scholar
- Derogatis, L. R., & Unger, R. (2010). Symptom checklist-90-revised. Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0970. Advance Online Publication.
- Derogatis, L. R., Savitz, K. L., & Maruish, M. E. (Eds.). (1999). The SCL-90-R, brief symptom inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed.pp. 679–724). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Edwards, K. R., Martin, R. A., & Dozois, D. J. (2010). The fear of being laughed at, social anxiety, and memories of being teased during childhood. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 94–107.Google Scholar
- Ergün, P. (2004). Altay Destanlarında ve Anadolu Türk Masallarında Tastarakay-Keloğlan [Tastaratay-Keloğlan in Altaic epics and Anatolian Turkish folktales]. Türk Dünyası Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi, 18, 37–45.Google Scholar
- Güngör, D., & Bornstein, M. H. (2010). Culture-general and -specific associations of attachment avoidance and anxiety with perceived parental warmth and psychological control among Turk and Belgian adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Heintz, S., & Ruch, W. (2015). An examination of the convergence between the conceptualization and the measurement of humor styles: A study of the construct validity of the humor styles questionnaire. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 28, 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2015-0095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hofmann, J., Platt, T., Ruch, W., & Proyer, R. T. (2015). Individual differences in gelotophobia predict responses to joy and contempt. Sage Open, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015581191.
- Huston, A., Duncan, G., Granger, R., Bos, J., McLoyd, V., Mistry, R., … Ventura, A. (2001). Work-based antipoverty programs for parents can enhance the school performance and social behavior of children. Child Development, 72, 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00281.
- Ivanova, E. M., Makogon, I. K., Stefanenko, E. A., Enikolopov, S. N., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2016). Русскоязычная адаптация опросника гелотофобии, гелотофилии и катагеластицизма PhoPhiKat [the Russian-language adaptation of the questionnaire for gelotophobia, gelotophilia and katagelasticism PhoPhiKat]. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2, 162–171.Google Scholar
- Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (1997). Individualism and collectivism. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1–50). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Kozan, K. (1983). Davranış bilimleri araştırmalarında sosyal beğenirlik boyutu ve Türkiye için bir sosyal beğenirlik ölçeği [Social desirability dimension in behavioral science research and a social desirability scale for Turkey]. ODTÜ Geliştirme Dergisi, 10, 447–478.Google Scholar
- Lampert, M. D., Isaacson, K. L., & Lyttle, J. (2010). Cross-cultural variation in gelotophobia within the United States. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 202–216.Google Scholar
- Martin, R. A. (2007). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Özdemir, N. (2010). Mizah, eleştirel düşünce ve bilgelik: Nasreddin Hoca [humor, critical thinking and the wisdom: Nasreddin Hodja]. Milli Folklor, 22(87), 27–40 Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=4d785d8d-3e74-40a4-8e0a-089629fc79e6%40sessionmgr102&bdata=Jmxhbmc9dHImc2l0ZT1lZHMtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=58686926&db=a9h.Google Scholar
- Özdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Kaya, Z., & Recepoğlu, E. (2011). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin stresle başa çıkma tarzları ile kullandıkları mizah tarzları arasındaki ilişki [the relationship between primary school teachers’ coping styles with stress and humor styles]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 17, 405–428 Retrieved from http://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/922.Google Scholar
- Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
- Platt, T., & Forabosco, G. (2011). Gelotophobia: The fear of being laughed at. In P. Gremigni (Ed.), Humour and health promotion (pp. 229–252). Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Platt, T., Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2009). Gelotophobia and bullying: The assessment of the fear of being laughed at and its application among bullying victims. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 135–147.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T. (2012). Examining playfulness in adults: Testing its correlates with personality, positive psychological functioning, goal aspirations, and multi-methodically assessed ingenuity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54, 103–127.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., & Ruch, W. (2010). Enjoying and fearing laughter: Personality characteristics of gelotophobes, gelotophiles, and katagelasticists. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 148–160.Google Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., Ali, N. S., Al-Olimat, H. S., Amemiya, T., Adal, T. A., … Bawab, S. (2009). Breaking ground in cross-cultural research on the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia): A multi-national study involving 73 countries. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 22, 253–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2009.012.
- Proyer, R. T., Estoppey, S., & Ruch, W. (2012a). An initial study on how families deal with ridicule and being laughed at: Parenting styles and parent-child relations with respect to gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Journal of Adult Development, 19, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-012-9150-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Flisch, R., Tschupp, S., Platt, T., & Ruch, W. (2012b). How does psychopathy relate to humor and laughter? Dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at, the sense of humor, and psychopathic personality traits. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Neukom, M., Platt, T., & Ruch, W. (2012c). Assessing gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism in children: An initial study on how six to nine-year-olds deal with laughter and ridicule and how this relates to bullying and victimization. Child Indicators Research, 5, 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-011-9127-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proyer, R. T., Wellenzohn, S., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character and dealing with laughter: The relation of self- and peer-reported strengths of character with gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 148, 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.752336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rawlings, D., Tham, T. A., & Milner Davis, J. (2010). Gelotophobia, personality and emotion ratings following emotion-inducing scenarios. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 161–170.Google Scholar
- Renner, K. H., & Heydasch, T. (2010). Performing humor: On the relations between self-presentation styles, gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 171–190.Google Scholar
- Ruch, W., & Heintz, S. (2017). Experimentally manipulating items informs on the (limited) construct and criterion validity of the humor styles questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00616.
- Ruch, W., Harzer, C., & Proyer, R. T. (2013). Beyond being timid, witty, and cynical: Big five personality characteristics of gelotophobes, gelotophiles, and katagelasticists. International Studies in Humour, 2, 24–42.Google Scholar
- Samson, A. C., & Meyer, Y. (2010). Perception of aggressive humor in relation to gelotophobia, gelotophilia, and katagelasticism. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 217–230.Google Scholar
- Sümer, N., & Güngör, D. (1999). Çocuk yetiştirme stillerinin bağlanma stilleri, benlik değerlendirmeleri ve yakın ilişkiler üzerindeki etkisi [The impact of perceived parenting styles on attachment styles, self-evaluations and close relationships]. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 14, 35–62 Retrieved from https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/261522/2/CocukYetistirmeStilleri_SumerGungor_TPD_1999.pdf.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tümkaya, S. (2011). Humor styles and socio-demographic variables as predictors of subjective well-being of Turkish university students. Education and Science, 36, 158–170 Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/1009841829?pq-origsite=gscholar.Google Scholar
- Vaillant, G. E. (1977). Adaptation to life. Toronto: Little, Brown, & Co..Google Scholar
- Weiss, E. M., Schulter, G., Freudenthaler, H. H., Hofer, E., Pichler, N., & Papousek, I. (2012). Potential markers of aggressive behaviour: The fear of other persons' laughter and its overlaps with mental disorders. PLoS One, 7(5), e38088 Retrieved from http://eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=067fad7f-3f26-4f0c-994c-46ee9bd816b2%40sessionmgr4007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Yerlikaya, E.E. (2003). Mizah tarzları ölçeği uyarlama çalışması [a study on the adaptation of humor styles questionnaire]. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Adana: Cukurova University Institute of Social Sciences.Google Scholar