Skip to main content
Log in

African American student achievement and the historically Black University: the role of student engagement

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Student engagement is associated with a variety of positive outcomes, including student achievement, satisfaction, and persistence to degree completion. While previous research has demonstrated a positive relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes within individual courses, the literature has yet to investigate this relationship at a historically Black college or university (HBCU). The theory of intercultural effort suggests that minority students must put forth additional effort in to their studies in order to succeed in an academic environment that favors students from the majority race or culture, such as what is commonly observed at predominantly white universities. In contrast, African American students who attend HBCUs may benefit from a campus climate that is sensitive to their needs and culture of origin. Thus, the present study examined the role of student engagement for predicting student achievement among an African American undergraduate sample from a HBCU (N = 241). Using each student’s final grade in a psychology course, a regression model predicted student achievement (R2 = .265, p < .001), and student engagement remained significant over-and-above the effect of student demographic variables. These findings highlight the importance of improving African American students’ perceptions about their ability to succeed academically, suggesting that African American students who consistently put effort in to their course and believed that they could succeed did indeed perform higher than their peers. Other significant predictors of student achievement included student age, gender, and the number of years that they had attended college. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, W. (1992). The color of success: African-American college student outcomes at predominantly white and historically black public colleges and universities. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (1999). Desire to finish college: An empirical link between motivation and persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 461–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, T. A., & Gasman, M. (2014). An HBCU-based educational approach for Black college student success: Toward a framework with implications for all institutions. American Journal of Education, 121, 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1086/678112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change, 1, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2011.533096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. B., & Milem, J. F. (1999). The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education, 40, 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018708813711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhs, E. S., & Ladd, G. W. (2001). Peer rejection as an antecedent of young children’s school adjustment: An examination of mediating process. Developmental Psychology, 37, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. M. (2011). Using standardized tests to assess institution-wide student engagement. In R. L. Miller, E. Amsel, B. Kowalewski, B. Beins, K. Keith, & B. Peden, (Eds.). Promoting student engagement, volume 1: Programs, techniques and opportunities. Syracuse, NY: Society for the Teaching of Psychology.

  • Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. R., Mercer, S. H., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Dufrene, B. A. (2012). Barriers to the success of ethnic minority students in school psychology graduate programs. School Psychology Review, 41, 176–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coaxum, J. (2001). The misalignment between the Carnegie classifications and Black colleges. Urban Education, 36, 572–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupet, J., & Barnum, D. (2010). HBCU efficiency and endowments: An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 10, 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/ijea.2010.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, B. E., McIntosh, K., Reason, R. D., & Terenzini, P. T. (2014). Working with missing data in higher education research: A primer and real-world example. The Review of Higher Education, 37, 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2014.0026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruce, T., Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2006). Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debb, S. M., Dozier, J., & Haugh, L. (2014). Reengineering introductory psychology for the virtual classroom: Qualitative report on initial course design and preliminary student feedback. Inquiry, 19(1), 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSousa, D. J., & King, P. M. (1992). Are white students really more involved in collegiate experiences than black students? Journal of College Student Development, 33, 363–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 10, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, A. C., Sawatzky, M., & Korn, R. (2011). Theoretical foundations and a research agenda to validate measures of intercultural effort. The Review of Higher Education, 35, 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2008). Teacher support, student motivation, student need satisfaction, and college teacher course evaluations: Testing a sequential path model. Educational Psychology, 28, 711–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Voelkl, K. E. (1995). Disruptive and inattentive-withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 421–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/461853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, K. S., Harrington, S. J., & Santiago, J. (2009). The effect of engagement and perceived course value on deep and surface learning strategies. Emerging Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 12, 181–190.

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, M. J., Whipple, A. D., St. Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. The California School Psychologist, 8, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaither, J. (2005). Minority retention: What works? New directions for institutional research, No. 125. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53, 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gasman, M., & Bowman, N. (2011). How to paint a better portrait of HBCUs. Academe, 97, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasman, M., & Jennings, M. E. (2006). New research, new questions: Social foundations scholarship on historically Black colleges and Universities (HBCUs). Educational Foundations, 20, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliard, M. D. (1996). Racial climate and institutional support factors affecting success in predominantly white institutions: An examination of African American and white student experiences. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 1515A (UMI No. 9624).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloria, A. M., Kurpius, S. E., Hamilton, K. D., & Wilson, M. S. (1999). African American students’ persistence at a predominantly white university: Influence of social support, university comfort, and self-beliefs. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosset, B. J., Cuyjet, M. J., & Cockriel, I. (1998). African Americans’ perception of marginality in the campus culture. College Student Journal, 32, 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engagement in reading: Processes of motivated, strategic, and knowledgeable social readers. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Process, practices and policy implications (pp. 17–46). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403–422). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, W. D., Cabrera, A. F., & Milem, J. F. (2011). A tale of two groups: Differences between minority students and non-minority students in their predispositions to an engagement with diverse peers at a predominantly white institution. Research in Higher Education, 52, 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9201-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.98.3.184-192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R. (2015). Black male college achievers and resistant responses to racist stereotypes at predominantly white colleges and universities. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 646–674. 10.17763/0017-8055.85.4.646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R., & Hurtado, S. (2007). Nine themes in campus racial climates and implications for institutional implications. New Directions for Student Services, 120, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. R., Carini, R. M., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2004). Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at historically Black colleges and Universities. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2004.0035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrie, C. R., Bodily, R., Manwaring, K. C., & Graham, C. R. (2015a). Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 16, 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015b). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S., & McCormick, A. C. (2012). An engagement-based student typology and its relationship to college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 53, 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9254-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R., & Pace, C. R. (2003). Using NSSE to study student retention and withdrawal. Assessment Update, 15, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jett, C. (2013). HBCUs propel African American male mathematics majors. Journal of African American Studies, 17, 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-011-9194-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhangiani, R. S., Troisi, J. D., Fleck, B., Legg, A. M., & Hussey, H. D. (2015). Introduction. In Jhangiani, R. S., Troisi, J. D., Fleck, B., Legg, A. M., & Hussey, H. D. (Eds.). A Compendium of Scales for use in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/compscalessotp

  • Jimerson, S., Campos, E., & Greif, J. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. R., Soldner, M., Brown Leonard, J., Alvarez, P., Kurotsuchi Inkelas, K., Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., & Longerbeam, S. D. (2007). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 525–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2004). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington: Indiana University Center of Postsecondary Research (pp. 1–26).

  • Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32, 1–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R. M., & Gonyea, M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student on first-year college engagement grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, R. E. (2011). Documenting the beneficial effects of student engagement: Assessing student learning outcomes. In Miller, R. L., Amsel, E., Kowalewski, B. M., Beins, B. C., Keither, K. D., & Peden, B. F. (Eds.). Promoting Student Engagement. Volume 1: Programs, Techniques and Opportunities (pp. 251-257). Syracuse: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/pse2011/vol1/index.php

  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68, 241–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locks, A. M., Hurtado, S., Bowman, N. A., & Osegura, L. (2008). Extending notions of campus climate and diversity to students’ transition to college. The Review of Higher Education, 31, 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandernach, B. J. (2009). Effect of instructor-personalized multimedia in the online classroom. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 1–20.

  • Mandernach, B. J., Donnelli-Salle, E., & Dailey-Hebert, A. (2011). Assessing course student engagement. In Miller, R. L., Amsel, E., Kowalewski, B. M., Beins, B. C., Keither, K. D., & Peden, B. F. (Eds.). Promoting Student Engagement. Volume 1: Programs, Techniques and Opportunities (pp. 277-281). Syracuse: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/pse2011/vol1/index.php

  • Manly, C. A., & Wells, R. S. (2015). Reporting the use of multiple imputation for missing data in higher education research. Research in Higher Education, 56, 397–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., & Robinson, A. (2009). Boredom in the lecture theatre: An investigation into the contributors, moderators and outcomes of boredom amongst university students. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802042911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. B., Behrens, J. T., Greene, B. A., & Newman, D. (1993). Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, self-regulation, and persistence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1993.1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. L., Rycek, R. F., & Fritson, K. (2011). The effects of high impact learning experiences on student engagement. Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15, 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehlenkamp, J. J., Weiss, N., & Hansen, M. (2015). Problem-based learning for introductory psychology: Preliminary supporting evidence. Scholarship of Teaching & Learning in Psychology, 1, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council & Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson Laird, T. F., Bridges, B. K., Morelon-Quainoo, C. L., Williams, J. M., & Holmes, M. S. (2007). African American and Hispanic student engagement at minority serving and predominantly white institutions. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outcalt, C. L., & Skewes-Cox, T. E. (2002). Involvement, interaction, and satisfaction: The human environment at HBCUs. The Review of Higher Education, 33, 67–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2002.0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R., Davis, R., & Maramba, D. (2011). The impact of family support for African American males at an historically black University: Affirming the revision of Tinto’s theory. Journal of College Student Development, 52, 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2011.0066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Gonyea, R. M. (2003). The relationship between institutional mission and students’ involvement and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 44, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022055829783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendon, L. I., Jalomo, R. E., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical consideration in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Rethinking the departure puzzle: New theory and research on college student retention (pp. 127–156). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). Boston: Springer US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: The role of perceived control in children's engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, B. C. (2014). Online vs. face-to-face instruction: A comparison of engagement and gains for African-American and white students at predominantly white institutions. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations, 8892.

  • Svanum, S., & Bigatti, S. M. (2009). Academic course engagement during one semester forecasts college success: Engaged students are more likely to earn a degree, do it faster, and do it better. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swigart, T. E., & Murrell, P. H. (2001). Factors influencing estimates of gains made among African-American and Caucasian community college students. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 25, 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/106689201750122406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, G. (2002). Higher education’s self-reflexive turn: Toward an intercultural theory of student development. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 263–296. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2002.0024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. F. (2008). On firm foundations: African American Black college graduates and their doctoral student development in the Ivy league. In M. Gasman & C. L. Tudico (Eds.), Historically Black colleges and Universities: Triumphs, troubles, and taboos (pp. 27–39). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J. (2009). Quantitative data analysis: Doing social research to test ideas. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2000). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witecki, G., & Nonnecke, B. (2015). Engagement in digital lecture halls: A study of student course engagement and mobile device use during lecture. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14, 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, S., & Bruce, M. A. (2011). Classroom community and student engagement in online courses. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 7, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabel, K. L., & Heger, A. (2015). Student engagement in coursework: Measures, coursework, and future directions. In Jhangiani, R. S., Troisi, J. D., Fleck, B., Legg, A. M., & Hussey, H. D. (Eds.). A Compendium of Scales for use in the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning. Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Retrieved from http://teachpsych.org/ebooks/compscalessotp

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander T. Shappie.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shappie, A.T., Debb, S.M. African American student achievement and the historically Black University: the role of student engagement. Curr Psychol 38, 1649–1661 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9723-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9723-4

Keywords

Navigation