Examining the Impostor Phenomenon in Relation to Self-Esteem Level and Self-Esteem Instability
- 913 Downloads
The impostor phenomenon involves feelings of intellectual self-doubt that often occur to people in challenging new roles or in the wake of personal success. Many previous studies appear to have understated the relationship between the impostor phenomenon and self-esteem, and have included only measures of self-esteem level in their designs. In the present study, the impostor phenomenon was examined in relation to both self-esteem level and self-esteem instability. Three-hundred and four undergraduates completed the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and a measure of self-rated instability. A subsample was also assessed for statistical instability (n = 38). The impostor phenomenon was negatively correlated with self-esteem level (r = −.62) and positively correlated with self-reported (r = .32) and statistical (r = .57) instability (all ps < .001). A multiple regression model predicting the impostor phenomenon with self-esteem level and self-rated instability revealed a negative main effect of self-esteem level and a significant 2-way interaction. Simple slopes analysis revealed that the negative effect of self-esteem level was weaker among participants with unstable self-esteem, compared to those with stable self-esteem. Results emphasize the critical involvement of self-esteem problems in the impostor phenomenon, indicating that people with low self-esteem are especially vulnerable to impostor feelings, and that people with unstable high self-esteem are more vulnerable to such feelings than are those with stable high self-esteem.
KeywordsImpostor phenomenon Perceived fraudulence Self-esteem Self-esteem instability Self-esteem fragility
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Nick Schubert declares he has no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
Anne Bowker declares she has no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
- Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bernat, E. (2008). Towards a pedagogy of empowerment: The case of “impostor syndrome” among pre-service non-native speaker teachers in TESO. ELTED, 11, 1–8.Google Scholar
- Castro, D., Jones, R., & Mirsalimi, H. (2010). Parentification and the impostor phenomenon: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Family Therapy, 3. doi: 10.1080/01926180490425676.
- Clance, P. (1985). When success makes you feel like a fake. Atlanta: Peachtree Publishers.Google Scholar
- Franck, E., Vanderhasselt, M., Goubert, L., Loeys, T., Temmerman, M., & De Raedt, R. (2016). The role of self-esteem instability in the development of postnatal depression: A prospective study testing a diathesis-stress account. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 50, 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.04.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harvey, J. (1981). The impostor phenomenon and achievements: A failure to internalize success. Temple University.Google Scholar
- Lindeman, D., Britton, D., & Zundi, E. (2016). “I don’t know why they make it so hard here”: Institutional factors and undergraduate women’s STEM participation. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 8(2), 221–241.Google Scholar
- Neureiter, M., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2016). An inner barrier to career development: Preconditions of the impostor phenomen on and consequences for career development. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00048.
- Newman, L. S., & Wadas, R. F. (1997). When stakes are higher: Self-esteem instability and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12(1), 217–232.Google Scholar
- Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hilldale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Sinclair, S., Blais, M., Gansler, D., Sandberg, E., Bistis, K., & Locicero, A. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 33(1), 56–80. doi: 10.1177/0163278709356187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sonnack, C., & Towell, T. (2001). The impostor phenomenon in British university students: Relationships between self-esteem, mental health, parental rearing style and socioeconomic status. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(6), 863–874. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00184-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Topping, M. (1983). The Impostor Phenomenon: A Study of Its Construct and Incidence in University Faculty Members. University of South Florida.Google Scholar
- Topping, M., & Kimmel, E. (1985). The imposter phenomenon: Feeling phony. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7(2), 213–226.Google Scholar
- Webster, G. D., Kirkpatrick, L. a., Nezlek, J. B., Smith, C. V., & Paddock, E. L. (2007). Different slopes for different folks: Self-esteem instability and gender as moderators of the relationship between self-esteem and attitudinal aggression. Self and Identity, 6(1), 74–94. doi: 10.1080/15298860600920488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zeigler-Hill, V., Holden, C., Enjaian, B., Southard, A., Besser, A., Li, H., & Zhang, Q. (2015). Self-esteem instability and personality: The connections between feelings of self-worth and the big five dimensions of personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 183–198. doi: 10.1177/0146167214559719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar