Conspiracy Beliefs of Future Teachers
The present study was focused on examination of conspiracy beliefs in a specific sample of future teachers. The main aims of the study were to explore whether and to what extent endorse future teachers to conspiracy beliefs, and whether cognitive abilities are related to future teachers’ conspiracy beliefs. In two studies 394 future teachers completed Generic Conspiracist Belief Scale, Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire, Vienna Matrix Test, Rational-Experiential Inventory, Cognitive reflection test, Slovak Conspiracy Belief Scale. Future teachers had mid-point agreements with conspiracy theories (most often: government conspiracy beliefs, information control beliefs and unnecessary prescription of antibiotics beliefs). Students with low conspiracy beliefs were significantly higher in rational thinking style than those high in conspiracy beliefs, and students reading and watching legitimate media believed significantly more in conspiracy theories than those reading and watching tabloids. Benefits of critical thinking courses as a way of reducing conspiracy beliefs are discussed.
KeywordsConspiracy beliefs Conspiracy mentality Cognitive ability Thinking style
The study was funded by the VEGA Slovak Research Agency and is part of research project 2/0064/13 “Decision making of experts: Use of intuition by experts for solving strategic tasks” awarded to Vladimíra Čavojová. The author would like to thank Vladimíra Čavojová and Róbert Hanák for their productive discussions and helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This study was funded by the VEGA Slovak Research Agency and is part of research project 2/0064/13 “Decision making of experts: Use of intuition by experts for solving strategic tasks” awarded to Vladimíra Čavojová.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
Author declares that she has no conflict of interest.
- Aarnio, K., Lindeman, M. (2005) Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(7), 1227–1236.Google Scholar
- Ballová Mikušková, E., Hanák, R., & Čavojová, V. (2015). Appropriateness of two inventories measuring intuition (the PID and the REI). Studia Psychologica, 57(1), 81–100.Google Scholar
- Baron, J. (1991). Beliefs about thinking. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 2: Research and open questions (pp. 365–390). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, J., & Miller, C. (2010). The power of unreason. Conspiracy theories, extremism and counter-terrorism. London: Demos.Google Scholar
- Clarke, S. (2002). Conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Sciences, 131–150. doi: 10.1177/004931032002001.
- Čavojová, V., & Hanák, R. (2015). Examining irrational beliefs: The role of cognitive abilities, thinking dispositions and cognitive biases. Unpublished manuscript. Institute of experimental psychology, Slovak Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- Klose, J., Černochová, D., & Král, P. (2002). Vídeňský maticový test. Praha: Testcentrum.Google Scholar
- Kostovičová, L., Konečný, M., & Dudeková, K. (2013). Čo to vlastne meriame? Reflexia testu kognitívnej reflexie. In 31. Psychologické dni.Google Scholar
- Swami, V., Coles, R., Stieger, S., Pietschnig, J., Furnham, A., Rehim, S., & Voracek, M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953), 102(3), 443–463. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Van Prooijen, J.-W., Krouwel, A. P. M., & Pollet, T. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1–9. doi: 10.1177/1948550614567356.
- Walker, R. W., Hoekstra, S. J., & Vogl, R. J. (2002). Science education is no guarantee of skepticism. Skeptic, 9(3), 24–27.Google Scholar