Mean Girls: Provocative Clothing Leads to Intra-Sexual Competition between Females
- 529 Downloads
This study aimed to investigate indirect aggression between females from an evolutionary perspective, considering indirect aggression as a mechanism of intra-sexual competition. Previous research suggests that females who are dressed provocatively, or appear ‘sexually available’, are more likely to be victims of indirect aggression from other females. Investigating this notion via an empirical measure and a word-selection task, this study involved a female confederate posing as a participant, who was dressed provocatively in one condition and conservatively in the other. Sixty-five females completed an intra-sexual competition scale and a word selection task in which they were able to select complimentary or derogatory phrases to describe the confederate. Making derogative comments is a common form of indirect aggression; therefore, those who selected derogatory phrases could be considered to be exhibiting indirect aggression. Consistent with our hypotheses, females in the provocative condition obtained significantly higher intra-sexual competition scores, selected more derogatory words, and less complimentary words than those in the conservative condition, indicating that females dressed provocatively are indirectly aggressed against to a greater extent than those that are not. This paper adds further support to the notion that indirect aggression is used by females as a method of intra-sexual competition, particularly towards provocatively dressed females.
KeywordsIntra-female competition Sexual selection Provocative clothing Word selection
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This research involved collecting data from human participants. Informed consent was taken from all participants who took part in this study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
- Bateson, P. P. G. (1983). Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). The development of direct and indirect aggressive strategies in males and females. In K. Björkqvist & P. Niemela (Eds.), Of mice and women: aspects of female aggression (pp. 51–64). California: Academic Press Inc.. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-102590-8.50010-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Björkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20(1), 27–33. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:1<27::aid-ab2480200105>3.0.co;2-q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest. London: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
- Halliday, T. R. (1983). Mate choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M., Cassidy, W., Brown, K. N. (2013). “You Were Born Ugly and You’ll Die Ugly Too’. Cyber-Bullying as Relational Aggression. Education, 15(2). Available online at http://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/57.
- Lagerspetz, K. M., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11-to 12-year-old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14(6), 403–414. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:6<403::aid-ab2480140602>3.0.co;2-d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, S., Pitesa, M., Pillutla, M., & Thau, S. (2015). When beauty helps and when it hurts: an organizational context model of attractiveness discrimination in selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 128, 15–28. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Low, S., Frey, K. S., & Brockman, C. J. (2010). Gossip on the playground: changes associated with universal intervention, retaliation beliefs, and supportive friends. School Psychology Review, 39(4), 536.Google Scholar
- McAnulty, R. (2012). Sex in college – the things they Don’t write home about. California: ABC-CLIO, LLC.Google Scholar
- Nettle, D. (2009). Evolution and genetics for psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, M. L., Perrett, D. I., Jones, B. C., Cornwell, R. E., Moore, F. R., Feinberg, D. R., Boothroyd, L. G., Durrani, S. J., Stirrat, M. R., Whiten, S., Pitman, R. M., & Hillier, S. G. (2006). Facial appearance is a cue to Oestrogen levels in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273(1583), 135–140. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, P. K., Del Barrio, C., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2013). Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: how useful are the terms. In S. Bauman, D. Cross, & J. Walker (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research: definitions, measures, and methodology (pp. 26–40). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. Abramson & S. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual Nature, Sexual Culture (pp. 80–113). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
- Vaillancourt, T., Miller, J. L., & Sharma, A. (2010). Tripping the prom queen: female intra-sexual competition and indirect aggression. In K. Österman (Ed.), Indirect and direct aggression (pp. 17–32). Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Webb, L. M. (2015). Shame Transfigured: Slut-Shaming from Rome to Cyberspace. First Monday, 20(4), Available online at www.journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5464. doi: 10.5210/fm.v20i4.5464.