The Strategic Helper: Narcissism and Prosocial Motives and Behaviors
- 2.7k Downloads
Across three studies, we examined the relationship between narcissism, prosocial behaviors, and the reasons why people engaged in them. Specifically, we examined how narcissistic people engaged in charitable donations, taking advantage of a naturally occurring mass charitable donation campaign, the ALS “ice bucket challenge” (Study 1). We also examined how narcissism was related to volunteering and other types of prosocial behaviors (Studies 2 and 3). Moreover, we compared and contrasted the prosocial responses of more empathic versus more narcissistic people (Studies 2 and 3). This paper can help scholars and practitioners to determine under which circumstances, and for which reasons, narcissistic people may exhibit prosocial behaviors.
KeywordsNarcissism Prosocial behavior Empathy Charitable donations Volunteering Motives for volunteering Helping
This project was supported by grants from the John Templeton Foundation (#47993 and 57942) and Wake Forest University, The Character Project.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This project was supported by grants from the John Templeton Foundation (#47993 and 57942) and Wake Forest University, The Character Project. The first author was also funded by the National Institutes of Health while writing this paper.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in Studies 2 and 3. Study 1 was an exempt study that relied on an existing de-identified dataset.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Arble, E. P. (2008). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the hypersensitive narcissism scale: Implications for the distinction of covert and overt narcissism. Ypsilanti: (Master of Science), Eastern Michigan University.Google Scholar
- Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Personality and social psychology (vol. vol. 5). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Brunell, A. B., Davis, M. S., Schley, D. R., Eng, A. L., van Dulmen, M. H. M., Wester, K. L. et al. (2013). A new measure of interpersonal exploitativeness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi: 299 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00299
- Campbell, W. K., & Foster, J. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. The Self, 115–138.Google Scholar
- Facebook.com. (2014). The ice bucket challenge on facebook (9/7/14) Accessed 8/20/2015 at http://newsroom.fb.com/news/2014/08/the-ice-bucket-challenge-on-facebook/.
- Munk, C. (2014). Ice bucket donations continue to rise: $94.3 million since July 29. ALS Association. http://www.alsa.org/news/media/press-releases/ice-bucket-challenge-082714.html.
- Smith, T., Marsden, P., Hout, M., & Kim, J. (2013). General Social Surveys, 1972–2012 [machine-readable data file]. Sponsored by National Science Foundation. --NORC ed.-- Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [producer]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributor].Google Scholar
- Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197204)28:2<191::aid-jclp2270280220>3.0.co;2-g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stukas, A. A., Hoye, R., Nicholson, M., Brown, K. M., & Aisbett, L. (2014). Motivations to volunteer and their associations with volunteers’ well-being. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 0899764014561122.Google Scholar
- Zhou, H., Zhou, H., & Zhang, B. (2010). Relationships among narcissism, empathy, and prosocial behaviours. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18(2), 228–231.Google Scholar