Abstract
The misinformation effect is regarded by many to be fully memory-related. The paper presents results demonstrating that it may occur without memory distortions or source monitoring errors. Three experiments were conducted, in which the participants were allowed to access the original and post-event source while answering. All experiments used a discrepancy detection test in order to see whether participants aware of discrepancies and having access to the original source, still provide answers consistent with misinformation. In Experiments 2 and 3, the participants’ actions in the modified procedure were recorded, ensuring that subjects actively access the original source. A misinformation effect was obtained in all experiments. Moreover, awareness of discrepancies did not fully protect against the misinformation effect. Results demonstrate that existing memory-related explanations of the misinformation effect, including source misattribution, may not be enough to fully understand it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 1–21. doi:10.3758/BF03209454.
Baym, C. J., & Gonsalves, B. D. (2010). Comparison of neural activity that leads to true memories, false memories, and forgetting: an fMRI study of the misinformation effect. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(3), 339–348. doi:10.3758/CABN.10.3.339.
Bekerian, D. A., & Bowers, J. N. (1983). Eyewitness testimony: were we misled? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1, 139–145. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.139.
Belli, R. F. (1993). Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final modified tests: evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 407–427.
Blank, H. (1998). Memory states and memory tasks. An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory, 6, 481–529. doi:10.1080/741943086.
Blank, H. (2005). Another look at retroactive and proactive interference: a quantitative analysis of conversion processes. Memory, 13(2), 200–224.
Brainerd, C. J., & Kingma, J. (1984). Do children have to remember to reason? A fuzzy trace theory of transitivity development. Developmental Review, 4, 311–377. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(84)90021-2.
Byrne, R. M. J. (1989). Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition, 31, 61–83.
Chechile, R. A. (2006). Memory hazard functions: a vehicle for theory development and test. Psychological Review, 113(1), 31–56. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.31.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way. Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650–669. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650.
Giles, J. W., Gopnik, A., & Heyman, G. D. (2002). Source monitoring reduces the suggestibility of preschool children. Psychological Science, 13, 288–291. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00453.
Greene, E., Flynn, M. S., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Inducing resistance to misleading information. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 207–219. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90571-0.
Hupbach, A., Gomez, R., & Nadel, L. (2009). Episodic memory reconsolidation: updating or source confusion? Memory, 17, 502–510. doi:10.1080/09658210902882399.
Lindsay, D. S. (1990). Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitness’s ability to remember event details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1077–1083. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1077.
Lindsay, D. S., & Johnson, M. K. (1989). The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source. Memory & Cognition, 17, 349–358. doi:10.3758/BF03198473.
Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705.
Loftus, E. F., & Hoffman, H. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: the creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 118, 100–104. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.100.
Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: an example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585–589. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80011-3.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19.
McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (1985a). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1–16. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.1.
McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (1985b). Postevent information and memory: reply to Loftus, Schooler, and Wagenaar. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 381–387. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.3.381.
Metcalfe Eich, J. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627–661.
Mitchell, K. J., & Zaragoza, M. S. (1996). Repeated exposure to suggestion and fales memory: the role of contextual variablity. Journal of Memory and Language, Special Issue: Illusions of Memory, 35, 246–260. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0014.
Oeberst, A., & Blank, H. (2012). Undoing suggestive influence on memory: the reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect. Cognition, 125, 141–159. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.009.
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Polczyk, R. (2007). Mechanizmy efektu dezinformacji w kontekście zeznań swiadka naocznego [Mechanisms of the misinformation effect in the context of eyewitness testimonies]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Saunders, J., & MacLeod, M. D. (2002). New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: the role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 127–142. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127.
Szpitalak, M., & Polczyk, R. (2011). Distortions in eyewitness memory – memory and non-memory mechanisms. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 85, 40–49.
Tousignant, J. P., Hall, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory and Cognition, 14, 329–338. doi:10.3758/BF03202511.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clandon Press/Oxford University Press.
Zaragoza, M. S., & Koshmider, J. W., III. (1989). Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 246–255. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.246.
Zaragoza, M. S., & Lane, S. M. (1994). Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 934–945. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934.
Zaragoza, M. S., McCloskey, M., & Jamis, M. (1987). Misleading postevent information and recall of the original event: further evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 36–44. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Polak, M., Dukała, K., Szpitalak, M. et al. Toward a Non-memory Misinformation Effect: Accessing the Original Source Does Not Prevent Yielding to Misinformation. Curr Psychol 35, 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9352-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9352-8