Moral Foundations and Attitudes Towards the Poor
- 670 Downloads
Why does the public have such polarizing views on the poor? This paper attempts to understand this issue by examining and exploring what predicts attitudes towards the poor. The exploration of this issue begins with a reference to the Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and how this particular framework has been used to explain polarizing issues such as abortion, gay marriage and stem cell research, among others. This paper argues that the MFT can provide a similar insight on attitudes towards the poor. With the MFT as a backdrop, the current study tested out the hypothesis using hierarchical multiple regression and explored the results further by using dominance analysis. Results showed that the Moral Foundations were good predictors of attitudes towards the poor. While Harm emerged as the only significant predictor, dominance analysis revealed the importance of each foundation as predictors. Harm is the strongest predictor followed by Fairness, Authority, Ingroup, and Purity. All five foundations appear to be better predictors as compared to one’s political affiliation.
KeywordsMoral foundations theory Attitudes towards the poor Political affiliation
- US Census Bureau (2013). Poverty: 2013 Highlights. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/.
- Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 28, 98–116.Google Scholar
- Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55–66.Google Scholar
- Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: how five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 184–194.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center (2014). 2014 Political polarization and typology survey. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/06/2014-Polarization-Topline-for-Release.pdf.
- Pew Research Center (2014). Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology. Retrieved March 16, 2015, from http://www.people-press.org/2014/06/26/the-political-typology-beyond-red-vs-blue/.
- Rudolph, T. J., & Evans, J. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 660–671.Google Scholar
- Volsky, I. (2014). Susan Collins Becomes Fourth Republican Senator To Support Same-Sex Marriage. Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2014/06/25/3453486/susan-collins-becomes-fourth-republican-senator-to-support-same-sex-marriage/.
- World Bank (2014). Poverty Overview. Retrieved October 24, 2014, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview.