Current Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 650–656

Moral Foundations and Attitudes Towards the Poor


DOI: 10.1007/s12144-015-9333-y

Cite this article as:
Low, M. & Wui, M.G.L. Curr Psychol (2016) 35: 650. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9333-y


Why does the public have such polarizing views on the poor? This paper attempts to understand this issue by examining and exploring what predicts attitudes towards the poor. The exploration of this issue begins with a reference to the Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) and how this particular framework has been used to explain polarizing issues such as abortion, gay marriage and stem cell research, among others. This paper argues that the MFT can provide a similar insight on attitudes towards the poor. With the MFT as a backdrop, the current study tested out the hypothesis using hierarchical multiple regression and explored the results further by using dominance analysis. Results showed that the Moral Foundations were good predictors of attitudes towards the poor. While Harm emerged as the only significant predictor, dominance analysis revealed the importance of each foundation as predictors. Harm is the strongest predictor followed by Fairness, Authority, Ingroup, and Purity. All five foundations appear to be better predictors as compared to one’s political affiliation.


Moral foundations theory Attitudes towards the poor Political affiliation 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUnited States
  2. 2.National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations