Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 421–426 | Cite as

Honesty–Humility and the HEXACO Structure of Religiosity and Well-Being

  • Naser AghababaeiEmail author
  • Agata Błachnio
  • Akram Arji
  • Masoud Chiniforoushan
  • Mustafa Tekke
  • Alireza Fazeli Mehrabadi
Article

Abstract

Past research has shown that general and intrinsic religiosity is related to higher Big Five Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and, to some extent, Extraversion. With the rise of the six-factor HEXACO (Honesty–Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Openness) model of personality, however, a more differentiated look at religiousness and personality is called for. It has been suggested that religiosity is more associated with Honesty–Humility than with Agreeableness. The new personality factor, Honesty–Humility has also been shown to have null or weak relations with happiness. In 5 studies involving 1375 participants from Iran, Poland, and Malaysia, the relations of Honesty–Humility and other HEXACO dimensions to religious orientation and well-being outcomes were investigated. As expected, Honesty–Humility was one of the strongest personality correlate of religiosity. Higher scores on religiousness were also associated with Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and to some extent, Extraversion showing that the main personality characteristics of religiosity are consistent across religious contexts and personality models. Relations of Honesty–Humility to psychological well-being scales were consistently positive and stronger than its relations to subjective well-being measures, suggesting that Honesty–Humility may not be “bad” for pleasure attainment and pain avoidance, but it is definitely “good” for living a virtuous, fully functioning life.

Keywords

Personality HEXACO Honesty–Humility Religiosity Well-being 

References

  1. Abdel-Khalek, A. M. (2013). Personality dimensions and religiosity among Kuwaiti Muslim college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghababaei, N. (2012). Religious, honest, and humble: looking for the religious person within the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 880–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghababaei, N., & Arji, A. (2014). Well-being and the HEXACO model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 56(1), 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aghababaei, N., Mohammadtabar, S., & Saffarinia, M. (2014a). Dirty dozen vs. the H factor: comparison of the dark triad and Honesty–Humility in prosociality, religiosity, and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aghababaei, N., Wasserman, J. A., & Nannini, D. (2014b). The religious person revisited: cross-cultural evidence from the HEXACO model of personality structure. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 17, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allport, G. W., & Ross, M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The prediction of Honesty–Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and five-factor models of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1216–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., & de Vries, R. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 139–152.Google Scholar
  10. Churchyard, J. S., Pine, K. J., Sharma, S., & Fletcher, B. C. (2014). Same traits, different variance: item-level variation within personality measures. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dezutter, J., Soenens, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2006). Religiosity and mental health: A further exploration of the relative importance of religious behaviors vs. religious attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 807–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Henningsgaard, J. M., & Arnau, R. C. (2008). Relationships between religiosity, spirituality, and personality: a multivariate analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hepp, J., Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., Zettler, I., Schmahl, C., & Niedtfeld, I. (2014). Active versus reactive cooperativeness in borderline psychopathology: a dissection based on the HEXACO model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hilbig, B. E., Zettler, I., Leist, F., & Heydasch, T. (2013). It takes two: Honesty–Humility and Agreeableness differentially predict active versus reactive cooperation. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 598–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hill, P. C. (1999). Religious orientation scale-revised (Gorsuch & McPherson, 1989). In P. C. Hill & R. W. Hood Jr. (Eds.), Measures of religiosity (pp. 154–155). Birmingham: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  17. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: the differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huta, V., & Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(6), 1425–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huta, V., Pelletier, L. G., Baxter, D., & Thompson, A. (2012). How eudaimonic and hedonic motives relate to the well-being of close others. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kashdan, T. B., & Nezlek, J. B. (2012). Whether, when, and how is spirituality related to well-being? Moving beyond single occasion questionnaires to understanding daily process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(11), 1523–1535.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2003). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2012). Getting mad and getting even: Agreeableness and Honesty–Humility as predictors of revenge intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 596–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacInnis, C. C., Busseri, M. A., Choma, B. L., & Hodson, G. (2013). The happy cyclist: examining the association between generalized authoritarianism and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 789–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., & Funder, D. C. (2008). Beyond self-report in the study of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being: correlations with acquaintance reports, clinician judgments and directly observed social behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 643–659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press: Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2006). Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 35, 1103–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saroglou, V. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: a meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saroglou, V. (2010). Religiousness as a cultural adaptation of basic traits: a five-factor model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 108–125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Blessed are the meek? Honesty–Humility, Agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of religious beliefs, motives, and values. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thielmann, S., & Hilbig, E. B. (2014). Trust in me, trust in you: a social projection account of the link between personality, cooperativeness, and trustworthiness expectations. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naser Aghababaei
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agata Błachnio
    • 2
  • Akram Arji
    • 1
  • Masoud Chiniforoushan
    • 1
  • Mustafa Tekke
    • 3
  • Alireza Fazeli Mehrabadi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and EducationAllameh Tabataba’i UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.The John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLublinPoland
  3. 3.International Islamic University MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.Shahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations