Skip to main content
Log in

Validating the Revised Self-Construal Scale in the Philippines

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigates the validity of the Revised Self-Construal Scale in the Philippines through within and between network construct validation approaches. Six hundred sixty five (665) Filipino samples were selected and asked to answer the Revised Self-Construal Scale and Concise Measure of Subjective Well Being Scale. After executing confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) to validate the hypothesized three-factor structure of self-construal, findings revealed that the alternative two-factor model seems to be the most appropriate model that represents cultural self-views of the present sample. Independent self-construal and interdependent self-construal also had acceptable reliability coefficients. Correlational analyses showed that both independent self-construal and interdependent self-construal were positively correlated with life satisfaction and positive affect. Yet, multiple regression analyses revealed that interdependent self-construal operates as a stronger predictor of life satisfaction and positive affect. Theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnocky, S., Stroink, M., & DeCicco, T. (2007). Self-construal predicts environmental concern, cooperation, and conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 255–264. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo, A. B. I. (2011). Lost in translation? Challenges in using psychological tests in the Philippines. Siliman Journal, 52(1), 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, R. W., & Lam, S. (2013). The interaction between social goals and self-construal on achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 136–148. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: a second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, S. D., Church, T. A., Katigbak, M. S., & Reyes, J. A. (1999). Self-described traits, values, and moods associated with individualism and collectivism: testing I-C theory in an individualistic (U.S.) and a collectivistic (Philippine) culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 466–500. doi:10.1177/0022022199030004005.

  • Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2013). Two faces of interdependence: harmony seeking and rejection avoidance. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 142–151. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju, H., Shin, J. W., Kim, C., Hyun, M., & Park, J. (2013). Mediational effect of meaning in life on the relationship between optimism and well-being in community elderly. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(2), 309–313. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2012.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. B., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Cross-cultural validation of the five-factor structure of social goals. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(2), 181–193. doi:10.1177/0734282911412542.

  • King, R. B., Ganotice, F. A., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). Validation of the Chinese version of the sense of self (SOS) Scale. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., & Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245–1267.

  • Kwan, V. S. Y., Bond, M. H., & Singelis, T. M. (1997). Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1038–1051. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, B. T. (2005). Self-construal and depression among Vietnamese-American adolescents. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 239–250. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, T. R., Bresnahan, M. J., Park, H. S., Lapinski, M. K., Wittenbaum, G. M., Shearman, S. M., et al. (2003). Self-construal scales lack validity. Human Communication Research, 29, 210–252. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00837.x.

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2004). Culture and conceptions of happiness: individual oriented and social oriented SWB. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 269–291. doi:10.1007/s10902-004-8789-5.

  • Lu, L., & Gilmour, R. (2007). Developing a new measure of independent and interdependent views of the self. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 249–257. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L., Gilmour, R., Kao, S. F., Eng, T. H., Hu, C. H., Chern, J. G., et al. (2001). Two ways to achieve happiness: when the east meets the west. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1161–1174. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00100-8.

  • Luo, W., Hogan, D., & Paris, S. G. (2011). Predicting Singapore students’ achievement goals in their english study: self-construal and classroom goal structure. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 526–535. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2001). Goals, culture, and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1674–1682. doi:10.1177/01461672012712010.

  • Reyes, J. A. S. (2005). Conceptualizing the happy filipino: implicit theories of counselors and students. Philippine Journal of Counseling Psychology, 7(1), 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591. doi:10.1177/0146167294205014.

  • Su, J. C., Lee, R. M., & Oishi, S. (2012). The role of culture and self-construal in the link between expressive suppression and depressive symptoms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 316–331. doi:10.1177/0022022112443413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, E. M., & Koo, J. (2011). A concise measure of subjective well-being (COMOSWB): scale development and validation. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25, 96–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takata, T. (2000). On the scale for measuring independent-interdependent view of self. Bulletin of Research Institute Nara University, 8, 145–163 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 269–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, Y., & Ogihara, Y. (2012). Personal or interpersonal construal of happiness: a cultural psychological perspective. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(4), 354–369. doi:10.5502/ijw.v2.i4.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, A., Kim, M., & Akutsu, S. (2014). The effects of self-construals, self-criticism, and self-compassion on depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 65–70. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesus Alfonso D. Datu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 15 kb)

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Item-total statistics of the revised self-construal scale

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Datu, J.A.D. Validating the Revised Self-Construal Scale in the Philippines. Curr Psychol 34, 626–633 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9275-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9275-9

Keywords

Navigation