Advertisement

Current Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 346–362 | Cite as

Generational Differences in Workplace Expectations: A Comparison of Production and Professional Workers

  • Sarah MooreEmail author
  • Leon Grunberg
  • Alan J. Krause
Article

Abstract

Much of the extant literature regarding generational cohort differences has been conducted on college-educated participants, a potential bias noted by previous researchers. The present study therefore examines generational cohort differences in workplace expectations between professional (i.e., “white-collar,” largely college educated) and production (i.e., “blue-collar,” largely non-college educated) workers. Using online survey data from 2,799 union workers employed by the same organization, we compared expectations when first hired as well as current workplace expectations between professional and production workers from three different generational cohorts (i.e., Gen Y, Gen X, and Baby Boomer). We found evidence for generational differences that confirms some of the common characterizations of Gen Y workers; however, this characterization was principally found within our professional subgroup of Gen Y employees. Further, the data suggest that other factors (e.g., workplace experiences, maturation effects) may shape current workplace expectations more than do generational differences. These results suggest that concern over generational differences may be limited to certain workplace expectations and to specific subgroups of employees.

Keywords

Generational differences White and blue-collar workers Workplace expectations 

References

  1. Block, S. (2009, May 22). Traditional company pensions are going away fast. USAToday [online]. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/perfi/retirement/2009-05-21-traditional-pensions-dying_N.htm.
  2. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change (pp. 71–138). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes, and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 891–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Constant Contact. (2013). Frequently asked questions: what is a normal survey response rate? Constant Contact Resource Center. Retrieved from http://support2.constantcontact.com/articles/FAQ/2344 .
  5. Deal, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2010). Millennials at work: what we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DeHauw, S., & DeVos, A. (2010). Millennials’career perspective and psychology contract expectations: does the recession lead to lowered expectations? Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & DeKerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career. Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 907–928.Google Scholar
  8. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emeagwali, N. S. (2011). Leading the charge for change. Techniques, 86(5), 23–26.Google Scholar
  10. Gallicano, T., Curtin, P., & Matthews, K. (2012). I love what I do, but… A relationship management survey of millennial generation public relations agency employees. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 222–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg, E., Grunberg, L., Moore, S., & Sikora, P. (2010). Turbulence: Boeing and the State of American workers and managers. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: an organization and management perspective. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joshi, A., Dencker, J. C., Franz, G., & Martocchio, J. J. (2010). Unpacking generational identities in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35, 392–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kowske, B. J., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: an empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lester, S. W., Standifer, R. L., Schultz, N. J., & Windsor, J. M. (2012). Actual versus perceived generational differences at work: an empirical examination. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lincoln, J. R., & Kalleberg, A. L. (1990). Culture, control, and commitment: A study of work organization and work attitudes in the United States and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lodahl, T., & Dejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers, K. K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: a communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 225–238.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: a field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Brien, K. (2013, July 24). Dispelling 4 ridiculous myths about GenY workers. Chicago Tribune. Retrieved from http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-07-24/business/sns-201307241800--tms--brazenctnbc-c20130724-20130724_1_millennials-geny-flexibility.
  21. Rao, K., & Pennington, J. (2013). Should the third reminder be sent? The role of survey response timing on web survey results. Journal of the Market Research Society, 55, 651–674.Google Scholar
  22. Rawlins, C., Indvik, J., & Johnson, P. R. (2008). Understanding the new generation: what the millennial cohort absolutely, positively, must have at work. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications, and Conflict, 12(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  23. Real, K., Mitnick, A. D., & Maloney, W. F. (2010). More similar than different: millennials in the U. S. building trades. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rubin, B. A. (2012). Shifting social contracts and the sociological imagination. Social Forces, 91, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thompson, C., & Gregory, J. (2012). Managing millennials: a framework for improving attraction, motivation, and retention. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 15(4), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Twenge, J. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 862–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Freeman, E. C. (2012). Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern for others, and civic orientation, 1966–2009. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1045–1062.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wesner, M. S., & Miller, T. (2008). Boomers and millennials have much in common. Organization Development Journal, 26(3), 89–96.Google Scholar
  32. Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation. Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 878–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Puget SoundTacomaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of Puget SoundTacomaUSA
  3. 3.School of Business and LeadershipUniversity of Puget SoundTacomaUSA

Personalised recommendations