Skip to main content

The Effects of Previous Misestimation of Task Duration on Estimating Future Task Duration

Abstract

It is a common time management problem that people underestimate the duration of tasks, which has been termed the “planning fallacy.” To overcome this, it has been suggested that people should be informed about how long they previously worked on the same task. This study, however, tests whether previous misestimation also affects the duration estimation of a novel task, even if the feedback is only self-generated. To test this, two groups of participants performed two unrelated, laboratory-based tasks in succession. Learning was manipulated by permitting only the experimental group to retrospectively estimate the duration of the first task before predicting the duration of the second task. Results showed that the experimental group underestimated the duration of the second task less than the control group, which indicates a general kind of learning from previous misestimation. The findings imply that people could be trained to carefully observe how much they misestimate task duration in order to stimulate learning. The findings are discussed in relation to the anchoring account of task duration misestimation and the memory-bias account of the planning fallacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 184–197. doi:10.3758/BF03209393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366–381. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & MacDonald, H. (1997). The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 238–247. doi:10.1177/0146167297233003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Peetz, J. (2010). The planning fallacy: cognitive, motivational, and social origins. In P. Z. Mark & M. O. James (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (43rd ed., pp. 1–62). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burt, C. D. B., & Kemp, S. (1994). Construction of activity duration and time management potential. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 8, 155–168. doi:10.1002/acp.2350080206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.92.1.111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36, 255–276. doi:10.1108/00483480710726136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortina, J. M., & Landis, R. S. (2009). When small effect sizes tell a big story, and when large effect sizes don’t. In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 287–308). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199–212. doi:10.1002/bdm.495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, M. A., Mazor, K. M., Baril, J., Alper, E., DeMarco, D., & Pugnaire, M. (2006). Learning from mistakes: factors that influence how students and residents learn from medical errors. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 419–423. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00420.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gick, M. L., & McGarry, S. J. (1992). Learning from mistakes: inducing analogous solution failures to a source problem produces later successes in analogical transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 623–639. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Halkjelsvik, T., & Jørgensen, M. (2012). From origami to software development: a review of studies on judgment-based predictions of performance time. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 238–271. doi:10.1037/a0025996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Halkjelsvik, T., Jørgensen, M., & Teigen, K. H. (2011). To read two pages, I need 5 min, but give me 5 min and I will read four: How to change productivity estimates by inverting the question. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 314–323. doi:10.1002/acp.1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinds, P. J. (1999). The curse of expertise: the effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 5, 205–221. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.5.2.205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 12, 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 59–69. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Koch, C. J., & Kleinmann, M. (2002). A stitch in time saves nine: behavioural decision-making explanations for time management problems. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 199–217. doi:10.1080/13594320244000120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. König, C. J. (2005). Anchors distort estimates of expected duration. Psychological Reports, 96, 253–256. doi:10.2466/PR0.96.2.253-256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. König, C. J., & Kleinmann, M. (2006). Individual differences in the use of time management mechanics and in time discounting. Individual Differences Research, 4, 194–207.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kruger, J., & Evans, M. (2004). If you don’t want to be late, enumerate: unpacking reduces the planning fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 586–598. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Macan, T. H. (1994). Time management: test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 381–391. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodon, C., & Meyer, T. (2012). Searching information on the web and planning fallacy: a pilot investigation of pessimistic forecasts. European Review of Applied Psychology, 62, 103–109. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2011.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roy, M. M. (2003). Memory bias: Why we underestimate the duration of future events. PhD thesis, University of California, San Diego.

  26. Roy, M. M., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2007). Bias in memory predicts bias in estimation of future task duration. Memory & Cognition, 35, 557–564. doi:10.3758/BF03193294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005a). The broad applicability of memory bias and its coexistence with the planning fallacy: reply to Griffin and Buehler (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 761–762. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Roy, M. M., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2005b). Underestimating the duration of future events: memory incorrectly used or memory bias? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 738–756. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.738.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Roy, M. M., Mitten, S. T., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2008). Correcting memory improves accuracy of predicted task duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 14, 266–275. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York, NY: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas, K. E., & Handley, S. J. (2008). Anchoring in time estimation. Acta Psychologica, 127, 24–29. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas, K. E., Handley, S. J., & Newstead, S. E. (2004). The effects of prior experience on estimating the duration of simple tasks. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 22, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas, K. E., Handley, S. J., & Newstead, S. E. (2007). The role of prior task experience in temporal misestimation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 230–240. doi:10.1080/17470210600785091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Weick, M., & Guinote, A. (2010). How long will it take? Power biases time predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 595–604. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelius J. König.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

König, C.J., Wirz, A., Thomas, K.E. et al. The Effects of Previous Misestimation of Task Duration on Estimating Future Task Duration. Curr Psychol 34, 1–13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9236-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Planning fallacy
  • Time management
  • Time estimation