Current Psychology

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 242–251 | Cite as

The Role of Face Familiarity in Judgments of Personality and Intelligence

  • Arne Weigold
  • Ingrid K. Weigold
  • Sara N. Natera
  • Elizabeth J. Russell
Article

Abstract

Personality judgments based on facial features are a common occurrence. The face familiarity overgeneralization hypothesis states that people make judgments of unknown faces based on their similarity to known faces. However, there is a dearth of research regarding how face familiarity relates to perceptions of personality and intelligence in strangers. The current article used two studies to provide evidence for the relationship between face familiarity and judgments of personality and intelligence. Study 1 showed that photographs perceived as familiar by one set of participants were rated more positively regarding personality and intelligence by a second group of participants. Study 2 found that high perceived familiarity resulted in positive judgments of personality and intelligence, whereas familiarity based on exposure did not. These findings indicate both that perceived familiarity significantly impacts positive judgments of personality and intelligence and that the face familiarity overgeneralization hypothesis is a useful framework for this area of research.

Keywords

Face familiarity Perceived familiarity Episodic familiarity Personality judgments Face familiarity overgeneralization hypothesis 

References

  1. Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1–31. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80050-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Claypool, H. M., Hugenberg, K., Housley, M. K., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Familiar eyes are smiling: on the role of familiarity in the perception of facial affect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 856–866. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehrhart, M. G., Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Nadler, K., & Bradshaw, K. (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 900–905. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi: 10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burton, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 330–337. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01519-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hassin, R., & Trope, R. (2000). Facing faces: studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 837–852. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.5.837.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2004). Expression influences the recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 33, 399–408. doi: 10.1068/p5083.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer, R. S. S., & Ward, R. (2010). Internal facial features are signals of personality and health. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2273–2287. doi: 10.1080/17470211003770912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 5, 214–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00503.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212-228. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.212
  14. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  15. Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1982). Exposure effects in person perception: familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395–415. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90062-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 315–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Penton-Voak, I. S., Pound, N., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: more evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607–640. doi: 10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peskin, M., & Newell, F. N. (2004). Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces. Perception, 33, 147–157. doi: 10.1068/p5028.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., & Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10, 52–58. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rubenstein, A. J., Kalakanis, L., & Langlois, J. H. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces: a cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology, 35, 848–855. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shevlin, M., Walker, S., Davies, M. N. O., Banyard, P., & Lewis, C. A. (2003). Can you judge a book by its cover? Evidence of self-stranger agreement on personality at zero acquaintance. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1373–1383. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00356-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, M., & Lee, H. K. (2007). The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 25, 306–338. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zebrowitz, L. A., White, B., & Wieneke, K. (2008). Mere exposure and racial prejudice: exposure to other-race faces increases liking for strangers of that race. Social Cognition, 26, 259–275. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arne Weigold
    • 1
  • Ingrid K. Weigold
    • 2
  • Sara N. Natera
    • 3
  • Elizabeth J. Russell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNotre Dame CollegeSouth EuclidUSA
  2. 2.Department of CounselingThe University of AkronAkronUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations