Skip to main content
Log in

The Intermingling of Social and Evolutionary Psychology Influences on Hair Color Preferences

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hypotheses were tested as explanations for why men and women have specific hair color preferences for mates. Traditional evolutionary psychology approaches suggest that men should prefer light hair on women because it signals youth and health, while women should desire dark hair on men because it signals maturity and stability. Repeated exposure predicts people prefer the hair color on mates they are exposed to most frequently. Uniqueness implies that men and women should desire the least prevalent hair colors on potential mates because of its scarcity and rarity. Findings primarily support traditional evolutionary psychology predictions and occasionally the repeated exposure hypothesis, but not uniqueness predictions. Sex and regional differences indicate that social and evolutionary processes combine to influence hair color preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. S. (2000). Attractiveness, attraction and sexual selection: evolutionary perspectives on the form and function of physical attractiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 273–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, T. C. (1968). Commodity and value change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243–275). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (2002). Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: population divergence, multiple ornaments and maintenance of polymorphism. Genetica, 116, 343–358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, G., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Conway, C. A., Tiddeman, B. P., et al. (2006). Visual adaptations to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. F. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Kenrick, D. T. (1998). Evolutionary social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 982–1026). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships, 9, 271–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B., & Sagarin, B. J. (2005). Principles of interpersonal influence. In T. C. Brock & M. C. Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 143–169). Thousand Oakes: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueis, C., & Hinsz, V.B. (2001, May). Gender and hair color: Preferences and beliefs. Blond and beautiful women—dark and handsome men? Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: DoubleDay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: a comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 981–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinman, S., & Gill, G. W. (1978). Sex differences in physical attractiveness preferences. Journal of Social Psychology, 105, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2006). European hair and eye color: a case of frequency-dependent sexual selection? Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, A. E., & Buss, D. M. (1994). Tactics for promoting sexual encounters. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (2001). Close relationships: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsz, V. B., Matz, D. C., & Patience, R. A. (2001). Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H., & Johnson, R. M. (1998). Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychological Science, 9, 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., Groth, G., & Trost, M. R. (1990). Evolution, traits, and the stages of human courtship: qualifying the parental investment model. Journal of Personality, 58, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lank, D. B. (2002). Diverse processes maintain plumage polymorphisms in birds. Journal of Avian Biology, 33, 327–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, E. D. (1971). Hair color, personality, and the observer. Psychological Reports, 28, 311–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tchividjian, L. R., & Kraxberger, B. E. (1994). Self-presentation can be hazardous to your health: impression management and health risk. Health Psychology, 13, 461–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans: partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matz, D.C., & Hinsz, V.B. (2000, January). Many gentlemen do not prefer blondes: Perceptions of, and preferences for, women’s hair color. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Nashville, TN.

  • Matz, D.C., Kane, A.A., Ryan, S.L. (2007, January). Tall, dark and handsome: Does men’s hair serve as a signal of desired traits? Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.

  • Perrett, D. I., Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., Oxley, R., et al. (2002). Facial attractiveness judgements reflect learning of parental age characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 269, 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R., & Druen, P. B. (1998). Deception to get a date. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1228–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweder, B. I. M. (1994). The impact of the face on long-term human relationships. Homo, 45, 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. R. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swap, W. C. (1977). Interpersonal attraction and repeated exposure to rewarders and punishers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 248–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature/sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, T. H. (1983). Minority type mate preference. Social Biology, 30, 162–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verlin B. Hinsz.

Additional information

Authors’ Notes

Portions of this research were presented at the 2005 meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in New Orleans. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Science Foundation (BCS-9905397) and the National Institute for Mental Health (R15 MH63734-01) awarded to the first author. We appreciate the comments of Dana Wallace and Renee Magnan on earlier drafts of the paper. The authors contributed equally to the article so authorship was determined by coin flips.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hinsz, V.B., Stoesser, C.J. & Matz, D.C. The Intermingling of Social and Evolutionary Psychology Influences on Hair Color Preferences. Curr Psychol 32, 136–149 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9169-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9169-2

Keywords

Navigation