Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Personality, Psychopathy, and Previous Experience with Assessment in Intentions to Fake in Psychological Testing

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Much research has addressed the possible antecedents of faking behaviour, however these approaches tend to be theoretical rather than empirical in nature. This study empirically examined for the first time the role of personality and previous experience with psychological testing in intentions to fake on psychological assessment. Participants (N = 232 community members, n = 175 females, n = 58 males) completed the HEXACO-60 measure of personality, a measure of primary and secondary psychopathy, provided information on whether they had experience in psychological assessment, and rated their intentions to fake in future psychological testing. Analysis via hierarchical multiple regression indicated lower levels of conscientiousness, higher levels of psychopathy, and previous experience with psychological testing significantly predicted intentions to engage in faking in future assessment. In addition, lower levels of secondary psychopathy were also associated with intentions, however inspection of zero-order correlations suggested this influence was via a suppressor effect. These results provide insight into the mechanisms predicting intentions to fake in psychological testing, which may subsequently inform recruiting or diagnostic practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: a short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 31, 340–345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., deVries, R. E., DiBlas, L., et al. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin, R. D., & Boyd, A. C. (2009). Faking and personality assessment in personnel selection: advancing models of faking. Canadian Psychology, 50, 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve, R., & Mahar, D. (2010). The role of fluid and emotional intelligence in malingering. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 103–111. doi:10.1080/00049530903032836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R. L., & Peterson, M. H. (2011). One piece at a time: the puzzle of applicant faking and a call for theory. Human Performance, 24, 291–301. doi:10.1080/08959285.2011.597474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, H. V., Thompson, J. S., & Poirier, J. G. (2007). Detecting deception in neuropsychological cases: toward an applied model. Forensic Examiner, 16(3), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: a clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 25–52. doi:10.1177/0093854896023001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, G. L. (2007). Identifying exaggeration and malingering. Pain Practice, 7(2), 94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2006). A model of faking likelihood in the employment interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 299–316. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2003.00353.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, M. R., Kiehl, K. A., & Fitzpatrick, C. M. (1995). Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalised population. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 151–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, K. R., & Marshman, K. J. (2008). Critiquing symptom validity tests for posttraumatic stress disorder: a modification of Hartman’s criteria. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(8), 1542–1550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C. J., & Metcalfe, B. (2003). The faking of personality questionnaire results: who’s kidding whom? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, A. F., Sydell, E. J., & Lueke, S. B. (1999). Towards a theory of applicant faking: integrating studies of deception. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K. A., Lange, R. T., & Dawes, S. (2005). Methods of detecting malingering and estimated symptom exaggeration base rates in Australia. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 4(4), 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, 1100 Nudgee Rd, Banyo, Brisbane, QLD, 4014, Australia

    Rachel Grieve

Authors
  1. Rachel Grieve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Grieve.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grieve, R. The Role of Personality, Psychopathy, and Previous Experience with Assessment in Intentions to Fake in Psychological Testing. Curr Psychol 31, 414–422 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9158-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9158-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation