Skip to main content
Log in

Hunger and Social Motivation: Hungry People are Less Interested in Social Activities than Satiated People

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

College students (N = 207) were asked their level of interest in sex, dating, and friendship affiliation before or after eating dinner at a dining hall. The threat of hunger before dinner was predicted to make participants focus on satisfying this need and therefore be less interested in social activities, compared to participants after dinner who were not hungry. Consistent with predictions, hungry males and females were less interested in sex, dating, and hanging out with friends compared to individuals who had just eaten. Results are considered in the context of motivation theory and recent research findings in the areas of physical attraction and social inclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alderfer, C. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 142–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderfer, C. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. M., Young, S. G., Sacco, D. F., Bernstein, M. J., & Claypool, H. M. (2009). Social inclusion facilitates interest in mating. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. D., & Morrison, E. L. (2005). The symptoms of resource scarcity: judgments of food and finances influence preferences for potential partners. Psychological Science, 16, 167–173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, L. D., Pettijohn, T. F., II, & Galak, J. (2007). Mate preferences in social cognitive context: When environmental and personal change leads to predictable cross-cultural variation. In V. Swami & A. Furnham (Eds.), Body beautiful: evolutionary and socio-cultural perspectives (pp. 185–206). New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettijohn, T. F., II, Sacco, D. F., Jr., & Yerkes, M. J. (2009). Hungry people prefer more mature mates: a field test of the environmental security hypothesis. The Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 3(3), 216–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., & Tovee, J. (2006). Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness? British Journal of Psychology, 97, 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry F. Pettijohn II.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pettijohn, T.F., Ahmed, S.F. & Pettijohn, T.F. Hunger and Social Motivation: Hungry People are Less Interested in Social Activities than Satiated People. Curr Psychol 31, 1–5 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9127-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-012-9127-4

Keywords

Navigation