Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lexical Decision Paradigms do not Differentiate between Fearful and Non-fearful Individuals

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-two spider-fearful, 33 blood/injury/injection fearful, and 28 non-fearful individuals (N = 93) participated in dual-task study. Participants were presented with blood, spider, neutral, positive and pseudo-word stimuli while having to also verbally identify numbers as either even or odd. Blood-fearful individuals responded slower than spider and non-fearful individuals. However, there was no interaction of group membership with stimuli type. This study replicates the results of two previous studies that have used a lexical decision task in an effort to differentiate between fearful and non-fearful individuals and found no significant differences between these two groups on this task. These results suggest that the lexical decision task in general may not be sensitive enough to elicit processing differences in non-clinical samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, M. W., & Main, K. J. (2001). Social anxiety and the cued activation of relational knowledge. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1637–1647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, D. H., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1995). Specific and social phobias. In H. I. Kaplan, & B. J. Sadock (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, VI (pp. 1204–1217). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E., Levin, M. R., & Craske, M. G. (1996). Effects of state anxiety on selective processing of threatening information. Cognition & Emotion, 10, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, K. M. & Ferraro, F. R. (2009). Primed lexical decision task in fearful and non-fearful individuals. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied, in press.

  • Ferraro, F. R. (1995). Aging, Alzheimer’s disease and word recognition: A review of the recent literature. In P. A. Allen, & T. R. Bashore (Eds.), Age differences in word and language processing. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F. R., & Chelminski, I. (1996). Preliminary normative data on the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS-SF) in a young adult sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 443–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F. R., Christopherson, K. M., & Douglas, J. (2006). Lexical decision task performance in blood-fearful and spider-fearful individuals. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, and Social, 25(2), 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellas, G., Ferraro, F. R., & Simpson, G. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and the time course of resource allocation in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, M., & Brosschot, J. F. (1998). Cognitive avoidance in phobia. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindt, M., Brosschot, J. F., & Boiten, F. (1999). High-level cognition in phobics: Abstract anticipatory memory is associated with the attenuation of physiological reactivity to threat. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13, 473–489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, I. M., & Mathews, A. (1979). Brief standard self rating for phobic patients. Behavior Research and Therapy, 17, 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öst, L. G. (1985). Mode of acquisition of phobias. Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis (Abstracts of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine), 529, 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusted, J., & Dighton, K. (1991). Selective processing of threat-material by spider phobics in a prose recall task. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawchuk, C. N., Lohr, J. M., Lee, T. C., & Tolin, D. F. (1999). Exposure to disgust-evoking imagery and information processing biases in blood-injection-injury phobia. Behavior Research & Therapy, 37, 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1988). Micro experimental laboratory: An integrated system for IBM-PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 20, 206–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, G. J., Ingram, R. E., & Matt, G. E. (2002). Affective interference: An explanation for negative attentional biases in dysphoria? Cognitive Therapy & Research, 26, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, S. J., & Salkovskis, P. M. (1997). Information processing in spider phobics: The Stroop color naming task may indicate strategic but not automatic bias. Behavior Research & Therapy, 35, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hout, M., Tenney, M., Hyugens, K., & de Jong, P. (1997). Preconscious processing bias in spider phobia. Behavior Research & Therapy, 35, 29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, H., & Green, M. W. (2003). A demonstration of attentional bias, using a novel dual task paradigm, towards clinically salient material in recovering alcohol abuse patients? Psychological Medicine, 33, 491–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., & Coyle, K. (1992). Recall bias for stimuli and response anxiety words in spider phobics. Anxiety Research, 4, 315–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., & Dagleish, T. (1991). Memory for phobia-related words in spider phobics. Cognition & Emotion, 5, 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., & Sharrock, R. (1984). Questionnaire dimensions of spider phobia. Behavior Research & Therapy, 22, 575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. N., McKenna, F. P., Sharrock, R., & Trozise, L. (1986). Color naming of phobia-related words. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 97–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. J. (1981). Manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale—revised. NY: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, A., & Holt, C. S. (2004). Situation-specific scripts for threat in two specific phobias. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 22(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, A., Zetocha, K., & Ferraro, F. R. (2007). Depth of processing and recall of threat material in fearful and nonfearful individuals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping: An International Journal, 20, 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Morningside College, 1501 Morningside College, Sioux City, IA, 51106, USA

    Kimberly M. Christopherson

  2. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA

    F. Richard Ferraro

Authors
  1. Kimberly M. Christopherson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Richard Ferraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly M. Christopherson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christopherson, K.M., Ferraro, F.R. Lexical Decision Paradigms do not Differentiate between Fearful and Non-fearful Individuals. Curr Psychol 28, 115–123 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9050-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-009-9050-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation