Current Psychology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 15–27 | Cite as

The effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on impression formation of politicians



In order to investigate the nature of the combination of varying levels of vocal and physical attractiveness on the perception of hypothetical political candidates, 90 adults rated photographs of target politicians on scales for the dimensions of competency, trustworthiness, qualification, and leadership ability. It was hypothesized and confirmed that the halo effect (higher ratings for highly attractive targets) elicited by physical attractiveness is stronger and more robust than the halo effect elicited by vocal attractiveness; however vocal attractiveness did impact the perception of the candidates by lowering the ratings associated with candidates that were presented as highly attractive but possessing an unattractive voice.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, G.R. (1977). Physical attractiveness research: Toward a developmental social psychology of beauty. Human Development, 20, 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, G.R. (1982). Physical attractiveness. In A.G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping (pp. 253–304). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Alley, T.R., & Hildebrandt, K.A. (1988). Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In T.R. Alley (Ed.), Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 101–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Ashmore, R.D., & Del Boca, F.K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banaji, M.R., & Hardin, CD. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, D.S. (1992). Vocal types and stereotypes: Joint effects of vocal attractiveness and vocal maturity on person perception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 157–215). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bull, R., & Rumsey, N. (1988). The social psychology of facial appearance. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Cash, T.F. (1990). The psychology of physical appearance: Aesthetics, attributes, and images. In T. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body Images: Development, deviance, and change (pp. 51–79). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dion, K, Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., & Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Efran, M. & Patterson, E. (1974). Voters vote beautiful: The effect of physical appearance on a national debate. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 6, 352–356.Google Scholar
  13. Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ilffe, A. (1960). A study of preferences in feminine beauty. British Journal of Psychology, 51, 267–273.Google Scholar
  15. Locher, P., Unger, R., Sociedade, P., & Wahl, J. (1993). At first glance: Accessibility of the physical attractiveness stereotype. Sex Roles, 28, 729–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M.R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyake, K., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Beyond personality impressions: Effects of physical and vocal attractiveness on false consensus, social comparison, affiliation, and assumed and perceived similarity. Journal of Personality, 61, 411–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O'Keefe, D.J. (1990).“Persuasion: Theory of Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Riggle, E.D., Ottati, V.C., Wyer, R.S., Kuklinski, J., & Schwarz, N. (1992). Bases of political judgments: The role of Stereotypie and nonstereotypic information. Political Behavior, 14, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., DiMatteo, M.R., Rogers, P.L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  22. Sears, D. (1968). Political behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology: Vol 5 (2nd edition, pp. 315–458). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Google Scholar
  23. Synder, M., Tanke, E.D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Terry, R. & Davis, J. (1976). Components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 562.Google Scholar
  25. Udry, R. (1965). Structural correlates of feminine beauty preferences in Britain and the U.S.: A comparison. Sociology and Social Research, 49, 330–342.Google Scholar
  26. Zuckerman, M. & Driver, R.E. (1989). What sounds beautiful is good: the vocal attractiveness stereotype. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1993). Precursors of interpersonal expectations: The vocal and physical attractiveness stereotypes. In P.D. Blanck (Ed.), Interpersonal expectations: Theory, research, and applications, (pp.194–217). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Zuckerman, M., Hodgins, H., & Miyake, K. (1990). The vocal attractiveness stereotype: replication and elaboration. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 14, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zuckerman, M., & Miyake, K. (1993). The attractive voice: What makes it so? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 17, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zuckerman, M., Miyake, K., & Hodgins, H. (1991). Cross-channel effects of vocal and physical attractiveness and their implications for interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 545–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saint Anselm CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations