Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of self and of ideal mates: Similarities and differences across the sexes

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For 19 mating-relevant traits, single males (N= 53) and single females (N= 86) rated (a) themselves relative to their same-sex peers, (b) their perceptions of the qualities desired by members of the opposite sex in an ideal partner, and (c) the qualities desired in their own ideal romantic partner. Several themes emerged from the data. First, males’ and females’ judgments of what members of the opposite-sex seek were generally accurate. Second, males and females both feel that they fall short of perceived opposite-sex expectations in a few areas. Third, both males and females desire an ideal partner better than themselves, but this is especially true for females. These findings are discussed in terms of evolutionary social psychological principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buss, D.M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M., Abbot, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A. et al. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M., Larsen, R.J., Westen, D., & Semmelroth, J. (1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D.M., Shackelford, T.K., Kirkpatrick, L.A., & Larsen, R.J. (2001). A half-century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, A.E., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, D.L., & Denton, K. (1997). Social illusions and self-deception: The evolution of biases in person perception. In J.A. Simpson & D.T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 21–48). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Nisbett, R.E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T.K. (1997). Perceptions of betrayal and the design of the mind. In J.A. Simpson & D.T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 73–108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J.A., & Kenrick, D.T. (Eds.). (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S.E., & Brown, J.D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871-1971 (pp 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn Geher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Clark, S.C., Dover, A.M., Geher, G. et al. Perceptions of self and of ideal mates: Similarities and differences across the sexes. Curr Psychol 24, 180–202 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1021-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1021-x

Keywords

Navigation