Skip to main content
Log in

Difference scores: A caveat illustrated with neuropsychological measures

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relationships among preferred minus non-preferred hand difference scores from four neuropsychological sensorimotor tests were evaluated in Community (N= 121), Prison Inmate (N = 350), and Psychiatric Inpatient (N = 398) samples. Across the three samples, the average absolute off-diagonal correlations among the four difference scores ranged from .07 to .13, and the squared multiple correlations (used to predict any difference score from the other three) did not exceed .07. Based on the determinant of the correlation matrix (i.e., |R|), the null hypothesis of complete independence was rejected in only the Prison Inmate sample (p < .001), however, departure from the null hypothesis was negligible (i.e., |R| = .94, expected value under the null = .98). Preferred/non-preferred hand ratio scores were very highly correlated with the difference scores and consequently analyses of the ratio scores yielded results that were comparable to those obtained for the difference scores. Results indicate that the four difference scores or four ratio scores measure little in common and therefore cannot corroborate each other. In general, it would be prudent to exercise considerable caution when using difference scores or ratio scores obtained from non-independent measures, either singly or in combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arthur, G. (1947). A point scale of performance tests. Revised Form II. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P. (1949). A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria. Biometrika, 36, 317–346.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L.D., Vaughan, H.G., Levita, E., & Farber, N. (1963). Purdue Pegboard as a predictor of the presence and laterally of cerebral lesions. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 133–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ctonbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J., & Furby, L. (1970). How we should measure “change”—or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 74, 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doward, J., & Posthuma, A. (1993). Validity limits of forensic neuropsychological testing. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 11, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. (1921). Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika, 10, 507–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, C. J., Osmon, D.C., Moses, J.A., & Berg, R.A. (1981). Interpretation of the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: A casebook approach. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, W.C. (1947). Brain and intelligence: A quantitative study of the frontal lobes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, F.M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 68, 304–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nies, K.J., & Sweet, J.J. (1994). Neuropsychological assessment and malingering: A critical review of past and present strategies. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 501–552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J.P., Churchill, G.A., & Brown, T.J. (1993). Caution in the use of difference scores. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 655–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purdue Research Foundation. (1948). Examiner’s manual for the Purdue Pegboard. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddon, J.R. (1987). Fisher’s tanrr−1 transformation of the correlation coefficient and a test for complete independence in a multivariate normal population. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddon, J.R., Gill, D.G., Gauk, S.E., & Maerz, M.D. (1988). Purdue Pegboard: Test-retest estimates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 503–506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reddon, J.R., Jackson, D.N., & Schopflocher, D. (1985). Distribution of the determinant of the sample correlation matrix: Monte Carlo type one error rates. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 384–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royce, J.R., Yeudall, L.T., & Bock, C. (1976). Factor analytic studies of human brain damage: I. First and second-order factors and their brain correlates. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 11, 381–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H.A. (1953). A method for judging all contrasts in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 40, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selby, M.J., Airy-Eggertsen, A.S., & Laver, G.D. (1998). Comparison of neuropsychological test performance in forensic and nonforensic populations. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. C. (1971). Reliability. In R.L. Thomdike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 356–442). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiercinsky, D. (1978). Manual for the adult neuropsychological evaluation. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S.S. (1932). Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. Biometrika, 24, 471–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. H., & Zimmerman, D. W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete? Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 59–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeudall, L.T., Fromm, D., Reddon, J.R., & Stefanyk, W.O. (1986). Normative data stratified by age and sex for 12 neuropsychological tests. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 918–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeudall, L. T., Reddon, J. R., Gill, D. M., & Stefanyk, W. O. (1987). Normative data for the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Tests stratified by age and sex. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 346–367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddon, J.R., Vander Veen, S. Difference scores: A caveat illustrated with neuropsychological measures. Curr Psychol 24, 60–67 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1004-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-005-1004-y

Keywords

Navigation