Current Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 218–233 | Cite as

Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis

  • Amanda Rivis
  • Paschal Sheeran


This study used meta-analysis: (a) to quantify the relationship between descriptive norms and intentions, and (b) to determine the increment in variance attributable to descriptive norms after variables from the theory of planned behaviour (TPB; Ajzen, 1991) had been controlled. Literature searches revealed twenty-one hypotheses based on a total sample of N = 8097 that could be included in the review. Overall, there was a medium to strong sample-weighted average correlation between descriptive norms and intentions (r += .44). Regression analysis showed that descriptive norms increased the variance explained in intention by 5 percent after attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control had been taken into account. Moderator analyses indicated that younger samples and health risk behaviours were both associated with stronger correlations between descriptive norms and intentions. Implications of the findings for the conceptualization of social influences in the TPB are discussed.


Subjective Norm Social Influence Behavioural Control Binge Drinking Plan Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Assessment of predictive validity and “perceived control.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Astrom, A. N., & Rise, J. (2001). Young adults' intention to eat healthy food: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Psychology and Health, 16, 223–237.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, C., Jonsson, I., & Conner, M. (2000). Understanding choice of milk and bread for breakfast among Swedish children aged 11-15 years: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 34, 5–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanton, H., Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Buunk, B. P., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., & Bakker, A. (2001). Accentuate the negative: Social images in the prediction and promotion of condom use. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 274–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buunk, B. P., & Bakker, A. B. (1995). Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. The Journal of Sex Research, 32, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buunk, B. P., Bakker, A. B., Siero, F. W., VandenEijnden, R. J. J. M., & Yzer, M. C. (1998). Predictors of AIDS-preventive behavioral intentions among adult heterosexuals at risk for HIV-infection: Extending current models and measures. AIDS Education and Prevention, 10, 149–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Castro, F. G., Maddahian, E., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1987). A multivariate model of the determinants of cigarette smoking among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 273–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Conner, M., & Armitage, C. (1998). Extending the theory of planned behavior: A review and avenues for future research. Journal of Applied Social Psycholgy, 28, 1429–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conner, M., Martin, E., Silverdale, N., & Grogan, S. (1996). Dieting in adolescence: An application of the theory of planned behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology, 1, 315–325.Google Scholar
  14. Conner, M., & McMillan, B. (1999). Interaction effects in the theory of planned behavior; Studying cannabis use. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 195–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cooper, S., & Donald, I. (2001). Extending the theory of planned behavior: Roles for descriptive and moral norms. Paper presented at the British Psychological Society Centenary Conference, Glasgow, March. Google Scholar
  16. Cottier, L. B., Compton, W. M., Ben Abdallah, A., Cunningham-Williams, R., Abram, F., Fichtenbaum, C., & Dotson, W. (1999). Peer delivered interventions reduce HIV risk behaviors among out-of-treatment drug abusers. Public Health, 113, 31–41.Google Scholar
  17. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eiser, J. R., & van der Pligt, J. (1984). Attitudinal and social factors in adolescent smoking: In search of peer group influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to healthrelated behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Grube, J. W., Morgan, M., & McGree, S. T. (1986). Attitudes and normative beliefs as predictors of smoking intentions and behaviors: A test of three models. British Journal of Socia l Psychology, 25, 81–93.Google Scholar
  23. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hooker, K., & Kaus, C. R. (1994). Health-related possible selves in young and middle adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 9, 126–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Kandel, D. B. (1980). Drug and drinking behavior among youth. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 235–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect; An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McMillan, B., & Conner, M. (2001). Applying an extended version of the theory of planned behavior to illicit drug use among students (manuscript under review).Google Scholar
  29. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1986). Peer cluster theory: Drugs and the adolescent. Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 17–22.Google Scholar
  30. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1987). Common elements in youth drug abuse: Peer clusters and other psychosocial factors. Journal of Drug Issues, 2, 133–151.Google Scholar
  31. Pasupathi, M. (1999). Age differences in response to conformity pressure for emotional and nonemotional material. Psychology and Aging, 14, 170–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Povey, R., Conner, M., Sparks, P., James, R., & Shepherd, R. (2000). The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating: Examining additive and moderating effects of social influence variables. Psychology and Health, 14, 991–1006.Google Scholar
  33. Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Unconscious effects of prototypes on health and social behavious: Evidence from young people's binge drinking. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  34. Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Social influences and the theory of planned behavior: Evidence for a direct relationship between prototypes and young people's exercise behavior. Psychology and Health, 18, 567–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosenthal, R. R., (1984). Meta-analytic Procedures for Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Schaalma, H., Kok, G., & Peters, L. (1993). Determinants of consistent condom use by adolescents: The impact of experience of sexual intercourse. Health Education Research, 8, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwarzer, R. (1988). Meta: Programs for Secondary Data Analysis. Berlin: Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
  38. Sebald, H. (1989). Adolescents' peer orientation: Changes in the support system during the past three decades. Adolescence, 24, 937–946.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sheeran, P. (in press). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Sheeran, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Augmenting the theory of planned behavior: Roles for anticipated regret and descriptive norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 2107–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheeran P., & Orbell, S. (1998). Do intentions predict condom use? Meta-analysis and examination of six moderator variables. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 231–250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sheeran, P., & Taylor, S. (1997). Predicting intentions to use condoms: Meta-analysis and comparison of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1624–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  44. Stanton, B. F., Li, X., Black, M. M., Ricardo, I., Galbraith, J., Feigelman, S., & Kaljee, L. (1996). Longitudinal stability and predictability of sexual perceptions, intentions, and behaviors among early adolescent African-Americans. Journal of Adolescent Health, 18, 10–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suls, J., & Mullen, B. (1982). From the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self-evaluation across the life span. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 97–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  46. Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1317–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Trafimow, D. (1994). Predicting intentions to use a condom from perceptions of normative pressure and confidence in those perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2151–2163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trafimow, D., & Sheeran, P. (1998). Some tests of the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, K. M., Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1994). Safer sex behavior: The role of attitudes, norms and control factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2164–2192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda Rivis
    • 1
  • Paschal Sheeran
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations