Abstract
This study examined the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales using participants enrolled at a Midwestern Catholic university (N = 328). The Forgiveness Scale is a 15—item Likert-type scale designed to measure forgiveness toward an of-fender. The Forgiveness Likelihood Scale is a 10—item Likert-type scale designed to measure tendency to forgive across situations. Factor analyses revealed that the For-giveness Scale contains two subscales (i.e., Absence of Negative, Presence of Posi-tive) and the Forgiveness Likelihood Scale consists of a single factor. Both scales have adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Both subscales of the Forgiveness Scale were significantly correlated in the expected direction with mea-sures of forgiveness, religiousness, anger, hope, religious well-being, existential well-being, and social desirability. The Forgiveness Likelihood Scale was significantly correlated in the expected direction with measures of forgiveness, religiousness, trait anger, religious well-being, and social desirability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Mabuk, R. H., Enright, R. D., & Cardis, P. A. (1995). Forgiveness education with parentally love-deprived late adolescents. Journal of Moral Education, 24, 427–444.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11, 330–340.
Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A developmental view. Journal of Moral Education, 21, 99–114.
Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (Vol. 1, pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group (1994). Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness. Human Development, 37, 63–80.
Freedman, S. (1998). Forgiveness and reconciliation: The importance of understanding how they differ. Counseling & Values, 42, 200–216.
Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 983–992.
Gorsuch, R. L., & Hao, J. Y. (1993). Forgiveness: An exploratory factor analysis and its relationships to religious variables. Review of Religious Research, 34, 333–347.
Hebl, J. H., & Enright, R. D. (1993). Forgiveness as a psychotherapeutic goal with elderly females. Psychotherapy, 30, 658–667.
Hoge, D. R. (1972). A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 369–376.
Luskin, F., & Thoresen, C. E. (1997). The effects of forgiveness training on psychosocial factors in college age adults. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
McCullough, M. E., Hoyt, W. T., & Rachal, K. C. (2000). What we know (and need to know) about assessing forgiveness constructs. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 65–88). New York: Guilford Press.
McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 1–14). New York: Guilford Press.
McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.
Miller, J. F., & Powers, M. J. (1988). Development of an instrument to measure hope. Nursing Research, 37, 6–10.
Paloma, M. M., & Gallup, G. H., Jr. (1991). Varieties of prayer: A survey report. Philadelphia: Trinity Press International.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
Rye, M.S. (1998). Evaluation of a secular and a religiously integrated forgiveness group therapy program for college students who have been wronged by a romantic partner. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.
Rye, M. S., Pargament, K. L., Ali, M. A., Beck, G. L., Dorff, E. N., Hallisey, C., Narayanan, V., Williams, J. G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In M.E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.) Forgiveness: Theory, research and practice (pp. 17–40). New York: Guilford Press.
Shoemaker, A., & Bolt, M. (1977). The Rokeach Value Survey and perceived Christian values. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 5, 139–142.
Smedes, L. B. (1996). The art of forgiving. Nashville, TN: Moorings.
Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S., & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (pp. 161–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., & Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Ado-lescence, 18, 641–655.
Thoresen, C. E., Luskin, F., & Harris, A. H. S. (1998). Science and forgiveness interventions: reflections and recommendations. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological re-search & theological perspectives (pp.163–190). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.
Veenstra, G. (1992). Psychological concepts of forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 160–169.
Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Graduate School of Psychology, Pasadena, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors thank Sarah Danko, Anne Hovancsek, Carla Kmett, Jennifer Martin, and Colleen Ryan for their assistance. We kindly request that researchers who use the forgiveness scales evaluated in this study provide us with a summary of their psychometric data for the scales. The idea for creating the Forgiveness Likelihood Scale was based upon the Willingness to Forgive Scale (Hebl & Enright, 1993).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rye, M.S., Loiacono, D.M., Folck, C.D. et al. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales. Curr Psychol 20, 260–277 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1011-6
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-001-1011-6