Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on “What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Historians of Economic Thought”

  • Published:
Forum for Social Economics

Abstract

The Comment on Wrenn’s article “What is Heterodox Economics?” suggests that the inability of heterodox economists to define their field arises from an as yet unrecognized and different metaphysical foundation than that of orthodox economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Excluding the catch-all description of not being orthodox or neoclassical.

  2. Bhaskar (1997) develops the idea of Generalized Conceptual Schemes (GCS) which arise from metaphysical positions. Within a GCS there can arise competing paradigms, but there may also arise competing GCS’s.

References

  • Becker, C. L. (1991). The heavenly city of the eighteenth-century philosophers. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. D. (1980). Toward a theory of the history of economics. History of Political Economy, 12(4), 610–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: the collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrenn, M. V. (2007). What is heterodox economics? Conversations with historians of economic thought. Forum for Social Economics, 36(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Marshall Meador.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meador, D.M. Comment on “What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Historians of Economic Thought”. For Soc Econ 38, 71–73 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-008-9019-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-008-9019-4

Keywords

Navigation