Since its intellectual inception, the development of the economics discipline has been accompanied by divergence of thought. Through the years, particularly in the latter half of the twentieth century, a fissure has emerged within the discipline, sociologically dividing conventional, mainstream economics from the dissention of heterodox economics. The nature of that division, however, as well as the nature of heterodox thought is unclear. Historians of economic thought would seem to be uniquely suited to specify the nature of heterodox economics and the mechanism of its marginalization. Although anecdotal, personal interviews with historians of economic thought provide a breadth and depth of study not available through surveys with an immediacy not allowed by doctrinal examination. The purpose of this study and intent of this paper is to reveal the ways that orthodox and heterodox economics differ, whether heterodox economics has any clear research program other than criticizing the limits of the more orthodox view, and what aspects of heterodox economics remain underdeveloped, all through the lens of the historian of economic thought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Backhouse, R. E. (2004). A suggestion for clarifying the study of dissent in economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(2), 261–71 June.
Blaug, M. (1997). Economic theory in retrospect (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boulding, K. E. (1957). Institutional economics: A new look at institutionalism. American Economic Review, 47(2), 1–27.
Breit, W., & Ransom, R. L. (1998). The academic scribblers (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Brue, S. L., & Grant, R. R. (2007). The evolution of economic thought (7th ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-western.
Ekelund Jr., R. B., & Hebert, R. F. (2004). A history of economic theory & method (4th ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press reissue.
Fusfeld, D. (2002). The age of the economist (9th ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Gruchy, A. G. (1967). Modern economic thought. New York: A.M. Kelley.
Heilbroner, R. L. (1999). The worldly philosophers (7th ed.). New York: Touchstone.
Hunt, E. K. (2002). History of economic thought: A critical perspective (2nd ed.). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Landreth, H., & Colander, D. C. (2002). History of economic thought (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflen.
Lee, F. (2002). The Association for Heterodox Economics: Past, present, and future. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50, 29–43.
Rima, I. H. (2001). Development of economic analysis (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
Roll, E. (1992). A history of economic thought (5th ed.). London: Faber and Faber.
Screpanti, E., & Zamagni, S. (2005). An outline of the history of economic thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spiegel, H. W. (1991). The growth of economic thought (3rd ed.). Durham: Duke University Press.
Vaggi, G., & Groenewegen, P. (2006). A concise history of economic thought: From merchantilism to monetarism. New York: Macmillan.
Wrenn, M. V. (2004). What is Heterodox Economics,? Ph.D. dissertation, Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
Mary V. Wrenn wishes to acknowledge gratefully the historians of economic thought who kindly agreed to be interviewed. The author would like to thank the Goddard School of Business and Economics at Weber State University for the generous support provided through their Vitality Grant and the University for its thoughtful commitment to and support of junior faculty through the Weber Writes grant, and anonymous referees.
The nature of the personal interview requires questions be asked verbally. The following questions should not therefore be interpreted as a strict verbatim script by which the interviews followed, although all questions were asked of all participants.
Which history of economic thought/methodology classes have you taught?
In those history of thought/methodology classes did you and if so, how much, time did you spend discussing heterodox economics?
What qualifies a school of thought or an individual as heterodox?
Which groups of thought would you consider to be heterodox economic schools of thought?
How would you describe the relationship between different heterodox schools of thought? Between heterodox and orthodox economics? Continuum, threshold, another way to describe these relationships?
How would you describe the current state of heterodox economics?
What would you describe as the main weaknesses of heterodox economics?
What would you describe as the main strengths of heterodox economics?
Are you a heterodox economist?
Is (are) there any current world event(s) that might make heterodox economics more acceptable or incorporated into the mainstream?
About this article
Cite this article
Wrenn, M.V. What is Heterodox Economics? Conversations with Historians of Economic Thought. For Soc Econ 36, 97–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-007-9002-5
- Heterodox economics
- History of economic thought and methodology
- Heterodox movement