Advertisement

Human Security and Citizenship in Finnish Religious Education: Rethinking Security Within the Human Rights Horizon

  • Gabriel O. Adebayo
  • Jan-Erik Mansikka
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses citizenship in Finnish religious education (RE) in relation to human security. It traces the characteristics of human security that connect citizenship, religion, and education in Finnish policy documents. The article focuses on basic education (grades 7–9). Its data were analyzed employing qualitative content analysis (QCA). The findings indicate that citizenship in Finnish RE entails personal security concerns dealing with psychological and human rights issues. These are found to be essentially human security as conceptualized by the United Nations (UN). However, Finnish policy documents sparingly utilize human security in explicit terms. Finland rather emphasizes the practical applications of human security. Incorporation of explicit global citizen and human rights issues into RE in the new Finnish curriculum seems to project critical global citizenship. This is found to promote human security. Following Finland’s bid for practical application of human security, we recommend (but cautiously) that human security be explicitly integrated into the Finnish RE curriculum.

Keywords

Citizenship Curriculum Diversity Human rights Human security Religious education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank our highly valued anonymous reviewers, the Editor-in-Chief of this journal and Dr. Robert Whiting for their efforts and comments on this paper. The original research ideas relating to the relationship between security and citizenship in Finnish RE that eventually brought about this article were presented by the first and corresponding author of this article in “Changing Subjects, Changing Pedagogies: Diversities in School and Education” conference held in Helsinki (Finland) on the May 27–29, 2015 and in “Shifting Borders in Religious Education” conference held in Tartu (Estonia) on the June 15–18, 2015. Appreciations to the two conference participants whose comments (on the presentations) eventually became the initial feedback on this study. We also thank the relevant personnel in the Language Services of the University of Helsinki for their efforts. This paper would not have attained this status without the resourcefulness of all these persons.

References

  1. Albert M, Buzan B (2011) Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation. Security Dialogue 42:413–425.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berg BL (2009) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryman A (2004) Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Buzan B, Hansen L (2009) The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buzan B, Wæver O, de Wilder J (1998) Security: A new framework. Lynne Rienner Publishers, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  6. C.A.S.E. C (2006) Critical approaches to security in Europe: A networked manifesto. Security Dialogue 37:443–487.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606073085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavelty MD, Mauer V (2012) Introduction. In: Cavelty MD, Mauer V (eds) The Routledge handbook of security studies. Routledge, New York, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  8. Commission on Human Security (2003) Human security now. Commission on Human Security, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies L (2009) Educating against extremism: Towards a critical politicisation of young people. International Review of Education 55:183–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-008-9126-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davies L (2014) Unsafe gods: Security, secularism and schooling. Institute of Education Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Davies L (2016) Security, extremism and education: Safeguarding or surveillance? British Journal of Educational Studies 64:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1107022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Forest J (2004) The human rights handbook: A global perspective for education by Liam Gearon. Harvard Educational Review 74:340–346Google Scholar
  13. FNBE (2004) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2004: National Core Curriculum for Basic Education Intended for Pupils in Compulsory Education. (Publication Reg. No 1/011/2004). FNBE, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  14. FNBE (2014) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. (Publications 2016: 5). FNBE, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  15. Gasper D (2005) Securing humanity: Situating ‘Human Security’ as concept and discourse. Journal of Human Development 6:221–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gearon L (2002) Human rights and religious education: Some postcolonial perspectives. British Journal of Religious Education 24:140–151.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0141620020240207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gearon L (2003) The human rights handbook: A global perspective for education. Trentham, OakhillGoogle Scholar
  18. Gearon L (2012a) The securitization of religion in education. In: Van Der Zee T, Lovat T (eds) New Perspectives on Religious and Spiritual Education. Waxmann, Münster, pp 215–233Google Scholar
  19. Gearon L (2012b) European religious education and European civil religion. British Journal of Educational Studies 60:151–169.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2012.671929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gearon L (2013) The counter terrorist classroom: Religion, education, and security. Religious Education 108:129–147.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00344087.2013.767660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gearon L (2014) The counter terrorist classroom: Countering extremism through (religious) education? In: Cere D, Thorp T (eds) Religion and conflict: Responding to the challenges. Tony Blair Faith Foundation, London, pp 64–69. https://jliflc.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Global-Perspective-Volume-01.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2017Google Scholar
  22. Gearon L (2015) Education, security and intelligence studies. British Journal of Educational Studies 63:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gearon L (2017) Secularisation and the securitisation of the sacred a response to Lewin’s framing of the Gearon–Jackson debate. British Journal of Educational Studies 65: 469–480.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1363375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghosh R, Manuel A, Chan WYA, Dilimulati M, Babaei M (2016) Education and security: A global literature review on the role of education in countering violent religious extremism. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change, London. https://institute.global/sites/default/files/inline-files/IGC_Education%20and%20Security.pdf. Accessed 1 November 2017.Google Scholar
  25. Hoover DR (2004) Introduction: Religion gets real. In: Seiple RA, Hoover DR (eds) Religion and security: The new nexus in international relations. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  26. Jackson R (2015) The politicisation and securitisation of religious education? A rejoinder. British Journal of Educational Studies 63:345–366.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1069257 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson R (2016) Inclusive study of religions and world views in schools: Signposts from the Council of Europe. Social Inclusion 4:14–25.  https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v4i2.493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson R (2017) ‘Who’s afraid of secularisation?’ A response to David Lewin. British Journal of Educational Studies 65:463–468.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1358804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laustsen CB, Wæver O (2000) In defence of religion: Sacred referent objects for securitization. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29:705–739.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290031601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewin D (2017) Who’s afraid of secularisation? Reframing the debate between Gearon and Jackson. British Journal of Educational Studies 65:445–461.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1305182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lombardi CB, Wellman JK Jr (2012) Introduction: Religion and human security: An understudied relationship. In: Wellman JK Jr, Lombardi CB (eds) Religion and human security: A global perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  32. MFA (1995) Security in a changing world: Guidelines for Finland’s security policy - report by the Council of State to the parliament 6 June 1995. (Report No. 8/1995).Google Scholar
  33. MFA (2004) Government report to parliament on the human rights policy of Finland 2004. (Report No. 5/2004). http://formin.finland.fi/public/default.aspx?contentid=324178&nodeid=49540&contentlan=2&culture=en-US . Accessed 8 October 2017
  34. MFA (2009) Government report to parliament on the human rights policy of Finland 2009. (Report No. 14/2009). http://formin.finland.fi/public/default.aspx?contentid=324113&contentlan=2&culture=en-US . Accessed 17 July 2017
  35. MFA (2014) Government of Finland human rights report 2014. http://formin.finland.fi/public/default.aspx?contentid=324091&nodeid=49540&contentlan=2&culture=en-US . Accessed 8 June 2017
  36. MoI (2008) Safety first: Internal security programme. (Publication No. 25/2008). http://www.hare.vn.fi/Uploads/14424/403391/JULKAISU_20090721073036_403391.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2017
  37. MoI (2012) Towards a cohesive society: Action plan to prevent violent extremism. (Publication No. 33/2012). http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/79460/sm_332012.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017
  38. MoI (2013) Government resolution on the future of migration 2020 strategy. http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CERD/Shared%20Documents/FIN/INT_CERD_ADR_FIN_22740_E.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2017
  39. OSCE (2007) Toledo guiding principles on teaching about religions and beliefs in public schools. OSCE/ODIHR, Warsaw. http://www.osce.org/odihr/29154?download=true. Accessed 17 January 2017
  40. Piattoeva N (2009) Citizenship and nationality in changing Europe: A comparative study of the aims of citizenship education in Russian and Finnish national education policy texts. Journal of Curriculum Studies 41:723–744.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270902845182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. PMO (2013) Finnish security and defence policy 2012: Government report. (Report No. 1/2013). http://vnk.fi/julkaisu?pubid=2205. Accessed 15 August 2017
  42. Poulter S (2013) Kansalaisena maallistuneessa maailmassa. Koulun uskonnonopetuksen yhteiskunnallisen tehtävän tarkastelua. [Citizenship in a secular age. The civic task of religious education]. Dissertation, University of TampereGoogle Scholar
  43. Poulter S (2017) From citizenship of God’s kingdom to liberal individualism? A critical historical analysis of Finnish religious education. British Journal of Religious Education 39:187–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2015.1110113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Räsänen P (2012) To the reader. In Towards a cohesive society: Action plan to prevent violent extremism. MoI, Helsinki, p 4Google Scholar
  45. Schreier M (2012) Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  46. Security and Defence Committee (2006) The strategy for securing the functions vital to society. (Government Resolution 23.11.2006). http://www.defmin.fi/files/858/06_12_12_YETTS__in_english.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2017
  47. Seiple C, Hoover DR, Otis P (2013) Introduction. In: Seiple C, Hoover DR, Otis P (eds) The Routledge handbook of religion and security. Routledge, London, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  48. Simola H (2000) Firmly bolted into the air: Wishful rationalism as a discursive basis for educational reforms. In: Ball SJ (ed) Sociology of education: Major themes. (Vol. 4). London, Routledge, pp 2112–2138Google Scholar
  49. Tadjbakhsh S, Chenoy AM (2007) Human security: concepts and implications. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Talib M (2006) Why is it so hard to encounter diversity? In: Talib M (ed) Diversity: A challenge for educators. Finnish Educational Research Association, Turku, pp 139–156Google Scholar
  51. Torney-Purta J (2002) The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science 6:203–212.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ubani M (2013) Threats and solutions: Multiculturalism, religion and educational policy. Intercultural Education 24:195–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2013.797701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ubani M, Tirri K (2006) How do Finnish pre-adolescents perceive religion and spirituality? International Journal of Children’s Spirituality 11:357–370.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13644360601014106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. UN (2010) Report of the special rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Heiner Bielefeldt. Human Rights CouncilGoogle Scholar
  55. UNDP (1994) Human development report 1994. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. UNDP (2009) Arab human development report 2009: Challenges to human security in Arab countries. UNDP, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weisse W (2007) The European research project on religion and education ‘REDCo’: An introduction. In: Jackson R, Miedema S, Weisse W, Williaime J (eds) Religion and education in Europe: Developments, contexts and debates. Waxmann, New York, pp 9–25Google Scholar
  58. Wellman JK Jr (2012) The dance of desire in religion and human security. In: Wellman JK Jr, Lombardi CB (eds) Religion and human security: A global perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 18–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018
corrected publication April/2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education, Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Nordic Centre of Excellence and Justice through Education, Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations