Contesting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the UN Human Rights Council

Abstract

Norm entrepreneurs have made significant strides in advancing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) resolutions at the UN Human Rights Council. However, these advancements are being fiercely contested. This paper examines the development of SOGI at the Council including how states advocate for and contest SOGI and the extent to which their positions are mutable. Resolution 32/2 of 2016, which created an independent expert, is the central focus of the paper. Participant interviews and content analysis of documents and statements are used to provide an in-depth analysis of how states advocate their positions on SOGI. The paper finds that framing is the primary tool used by states. Both proponents and opponents of SOGI believe their own positions are universal and adhere to prior international law, while their opponents’ positions are relativist and revisionist. The paper further finds that deadlock on SOGI resolutions is imminent until Member States’ domestic legislation changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The interviews were conducted confidentially because of the sensitive nature of the work. Without confidentiality agreements, most diplomats refused to discuss the Council and its proceedings.

  2. 2.

    See United Nations (2016a), 41st Meeting, 32nd Regular Session, Video, 3:34:28, June 30th, 2016, http://webtv.un.org/search/ahrc32l.2rev.1-vote-item3-41st-meeting-32nd-regular-session-of-human-rights-council/5009164455001?term=Sexual%20OrientationSOGI Resolution for a webcast of the entire debate. Alternatively, and hereafter, we will use a transcript provided by ILGA and Arc International. “Compilation of the Adoption of the 2016 SOGI Resolution,” Allied Rainbow Communities International (ARC International) and ILGA 2016, http://arc-international.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SOGI-Resolution-Vote-compilation-FINAL.pdf., p.8 (hereafter ILGA 2016).

References

  1. Aberbach J, Rockman B (2002) Conducting and coding elite interviews PS: Political Science and Politics 35:673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altman D, Symons J (2016) Queer wars. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson J (2011) Conservative christianity, the global south, and the battle of sexual orientation Third World Quarterly 32:1589–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ARC International (2014) Sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression and intersex related developments at the 27th Session of the UN Human Rights Council. http://arc-international.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ARC-report-HRC27.pdf. Accessed May 31 2017

  5. ARC International (2016) Appointing an independent expert on sexual orientation and gender identity: an analysis of process, results, and implications. http://arc-international.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/HRC32-final-report-EN.pdf. Accessed May 31 2017

  6. Ayoub P (2014) With Arms Wide Shut: Threat Perception, Norm Reception, and Mobilized Resistance to LGBT Rights. Journal of Human Rights 13:337–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baptiste N (2014) It’s not just Uganda: behind the christian right's onslaught in Africa. Foreign Policy in Focus. http://fpif.org/just-uganda-behind-christian-rights-onslaught-africa/. Accessed June 13 207

  8. BBC News (2015) Slovenia rejects gay marriage in referendum http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35147257. Accessed June 13 2017

  9. Bob C (2011) The global right wing and the clash of world politics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chase A (2016) Human rights contestations: sexual orientation and gender identity. The International Journal of Human Rights 20:703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein M (1997) Celebration and suppression: the strategic uses of identity by the lesbian and gay movement. American Journal of Sociology 103:531–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernstein M, Verta T (2013) The marrying kind? Debating same-sex marriage within the lesbian and gay movement. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietelhoff N, Zimmermann L (2013) Things we have lost in the fire: how different types of contestation affect the validity of international norms.

  14. D’Amico F (2015) LGBT and (dis)United Nations: sexual and gender minorities, international law, and UN politics. In: Picq M, Thiel M (ed) Sexualities in World Politics: How LGBTQ claims shape international relations, 1st edn. Routledge, New York, pp. 54–74.

    Google Scholar 

  15. European Council (2016) Council conclusions on LGBTI equality. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/06/16-epsco-conclusions-lgbti-equality/

  16. Finnemore M, Sikkink K (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52:887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghaziani A, Baldassarri D (2011) Cultural anchors and the organization of differences: a multi-method analysis of LGBT marches on Washington. American Sociological Review 76:179–2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Human Rights Watch (2016) UN makes history on sexual orientation, gender identity: human rights body establishes an independent expert. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/06/30/un-makes-history-sexual-orientation-gender-identity. Accessed July 13 2017

  19. International Commission of Jurists (2007) Yogyakarta Principles: principles on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity. http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/. Accessed November 14 2017.

  20. International Commission of Jurists (2016) SOGI UN Database. https://www.icj.org/sogi-un-database/. Accessed June 13 2017

  21. International Lesbian Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA), ARC International (2016) Compilation of the adoption of the 2016 SOGI resolution. http://arc-international.net/wpcontent/uploads/2016/08/SOGI-Resolution-Vote-compilation-FINAL.pdf. Accessed May 31 2017

  22. Josephson J (2005) Citizenship, same-sex marriage, feminist critiques of marriage. Perspectives on Politics 3:269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kralik J (2017) Bathroom bill legislature tracking. National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/-bathroom-bill-legislative-tracking635951130.aspx. Accessed June 13 2017

  24. Kollman K, Waites M (2009) The global politics of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender human rights: an introduction. Contemporary Politics 15:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leech B (2002) Asking questions: techniques for semistructured interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics 35:665–668.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu R, Mustanski B (2012) Suicidal ideation and self-harm in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. Am J Prev Med 42:221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McGill J (2014) SOGI... So what? sexual orientation, gender identity, and human rights discourse at the United Nations. Canadian Journal of Human Rights 3:1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mule N, McKenzie C, Khan M (2016) Recognition and legitimisation of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) at the UN: a critical systemic analysis. The British Journal of Social Work 46:2246–2262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 (2015). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2017) End abuse and detention of gay men in Chechnya, UN human rights experts tell Russia. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=21501. Accessed November 14, 2017.

  30. Outright International (2013) Other references to SOGI in the UN System. https://www.outrightinternational.org/sites/default/files/UN%20Special%20Procedures_RefSOGI.pdf. Accessed November 14, 2017

  31. Pappas C, Mendez J, Herrick R (2009) The negative effects of populism on gay and lesbian rights. Social Science Quarterly 90:150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Payne R (2001) Persuasion, frames, and norm construction. European Journal of International Relations 7:37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Persad X (2014) An expanding human rights corpus: sexual minority rights as international human rights. Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender 20:337–369.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Reid G (2016) Equality to brutality: global trends in LGBT Rights. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/01/07/equality-brutality-global-trends-lgbt-rights. Accessed May 31 2017

  35. Roseman M, Miller A (2011) Normalizing sex and its discontents: establishing sexual rights in international law. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender 34:314–375.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Stone A (2013) Flexible queers, serious bodies: transgender inclusion in queer spaces. Journal of Homosexuality 60:1647–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Swiebel J (2009) Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender human rights: the search for an international strategy. Contemporary Politics 15:19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Symons J, Altman D (2015) International norm polarization: sexuality as a subject of human rights protection. International Theory 7:61–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tansey O (2007) Process tracing and elite interviewing: a case of non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics 40:765–772.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tebbe EN, Moradi B (2012) Anti-transgender prejudice: a structural equation model of associated constructs. J Couns Psychol 59:251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. United Nations (2016a) 41st Meeting, 32nd Regular Session Video, June 30. http://webtv.un.org/search/ahrc32l.2rev.1-vote-item3-41st-meeting-32nd-regular-session-of-human-rights-council/5009164455001?term=Sexual%20OrientationSOGI. Accessed November 14, 2017

  42. United Nations (2016b) General Assembly adopts 50 Third Committee resolutions, as diverging views on sexual orientation, gender identity animate voting. https://www.un.org/press/en/2016/ga11879.doc.htm. Accessed July 13 2017

  43. United Nations (2017) Free & Equal. https://www.unfe.org/en/about. Accessed June 13 2017

  44. United Nations Human Rights Council (2011) Discriminatory laws and practices and acts of violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity: report of the United Nations Human Commissioner for Human Rights. A/HRC/19/41. November 17, 2011

  45. United Nations Human Rights Council (2015) Discrimination and violence against individuals based on their sexual orientation and gender identity: report of the High United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. A/HRC/29/23. May 4, 2015

  46. United Nations Human Rights Council (2016) Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. A/HRC/32/L.2/Rev.1. June 28, 2016.

  47. Universal Rights Group (2016) The Human Rights Council in 2016: leadership, resolve, and cooperation at the UN’s main human rights body. http://www.universal-rights.org/download.php?file=http://www.universal-rights.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/HRC_in_2016_page_by_page.pdf. Accessed May 31 2017

  48. Van Dyke N, McCammon H (ed) (2010) Strategic alliances: coalition building and social movements. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wiener A (2014) A theory of contestation. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Wiener A (2017) A theory of contestation: a concise summary of its arguments and concepts. Polity 49:109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Weiss M, Bosia M (2013) Global homophobia: states, movements, and the politics of oppression. University of Illinois Press, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wunderlich C (2013) Theoretical approaches in norm dynamics. In: Muller H, Wunderlich C (eds) Norm dynamics in multilateral arms control: interests, conflicts, and justice. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by International Programs and Research and Sponsored Programs at the University of Toledo. I would like to thank Dr. Helma de-Vries-Jordan, the European Studies Center at the University of Pittsburgh, and Dr. Scott Siegel for feedback and an opportunity to present this research. Finally, I would like to thank all interview participants for their willingness to candidly discuss the development of SOGI at the UN Human Rights Council.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Joel Voss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Voss, M.J. Contesting Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the UN Human Rights Council. Hum Rights Rev 19, 1–22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-017-0483-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • United Nations
  • Human rights
  • LGBT rights
  • Norms
  • Contestation
  • SOGI