Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gendered Justice Gaps in Bosnia–Herzegovina

Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A gendered reading of the liberal peacebuilding and transitional justice project in Bosnia–Herzegovina raises critical questions concerning the quality of the peace one hopes to achieve in transitional societies. By focusing on three-gendered justice gaps—the accountability, acknowledgement, and reparations gaps—this article examines structural constraints for women to engage in shaping and implementing transitional justice, and unmasks transitional justice as a site for the long-term construction of the gendered post-conflict order. Thus, the gendered dynamics of peacebuilding and transitional justice have produced a post-conflict order characterized by gendered peace and justice gaps. Yet, we conclude that women are doing justice within the Bosnian–Herzegovina transitional justice project, and that their presence and participation is complex, multilayered, and constrained yet critical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. The focus group was part of a larger study concerned with obstacles to women’s participation in peace processes. The study also includes case studies from Liberia, The Democratic Republic of Congo, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iraq. See Mannergren Selimovic et al., 2012.

  2. The Rome Statute of the ICC explicitly defines sexual and gender-based violence as crimes against humanity (article7g) beyond the act of rape, war crimes (article 8.2 ii), and to a certain extent as genocide (article 6d).

  3. One example is the reparations program recommended in the final report of the Truth, Reception, and Reconciliation Commission in Timor Leste (CAVR), which lists gender equity as one of five guiding principles (Rubio-Marín and de Greiff 2007).

  4. The Dayton Peace Accord (DPA) of 1995 included the BiH constitution which divided Bosnia–Herzegovina into two entities, the Bosnian-Serb Republika Srpska and The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, where Bosnian-Croats and Bosniaks (Muslims) cohabitate. Following the DPA, BiH saw a decade of international peacebuilding assistance including judicial reforms. In these processes, women were largely absent from political decision making (Björkdahl 2012). Like many other peace agreements, the DPA did not reflect women’s experiences or their expectations of the postwar peace. Assessing the Dayton Peace Accords from a gender perspective, the Swedish NGO Kvinna till Kvinna concludes that gender and women’s rights are not salient in the DPA. In fact, the DPA did “not diminish but reaffirmed the patriarchal nationalism as a dominant ideology and social system in postwar Bosnia” and established a peace that is far from gender just (Cockburn 2013: 127).

  5. There is also a state-level law on missing persons. Also in its draft stages is a program of assistance for women victims of war rape, sexual violence, and torture 2013–1016.

  6. The complexity of the justice system in BiH means that two criminal codes are in use with sometimes contradictory approaches (Impunity Watch 2012: 41).

  7. Articles 172 and 173 in the Criminal Code of BiH.

  8. In the Federation of BiH, legislation regulates including Law on Principles of Social Protection, Protection of all Civilian Victims of War, and Protection of Families with Children, Law on the Rights of War Veterans and Their Family members. In Republika Srpska, legislation include the Law on Protection of Civilian War Victims of Republika Srpska and the Law on the Rights of Veterans, Disabled War Veterans and Families of Soldiers fallen in the defensive, and Fatherland War of Republika Srpska (Impunity Watch 2012, pp. 49–50).

  9. The government system for compensations to war victims in BiH is complex, and the recipients are categorized into four categories as follows: (1) disabled war veterans (military payment), (2) payments to families of fallen or missing soldiers (military payment), (3) payments to civilian victims, and (4) payments to families whose members were killed or disappeared during the conflict. Out of 11,000 recipients of civilian payments, only 621 were victims of sexual violence in Federation of BiH. In RS, 3,843 persons were recipients of civilian payments (probably including victims of sexual violence in conflict but no specific category for this) compared with 69,451 persons receiving military payments.

References

  • BBC News (1 October 2004) Bosnian Serbs Reject Rape Plaque. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3706554.stm, accessed 19 Aug, 2010

  • Bell C, O’Rourke C (2007) Does feminism need a theory of transitional justice? an introductory essay. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkdahl A (2012) A gender-just peace? Exploring the post-Dayton peace process in Bosnia. Peace and Change 37 (2): 171–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley-Zistel S, Zolkos M (2012) Introduction: Gender in Transitional Justice in Buckley-Zistel S, Stanley R (eds) Gender and Transitional Justice. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke Houndmills

  • Cockburn C (2013) Against the odds—sustaining feminist momentum in post-war Bosni–Herzegovina. Women’s Studies International Forum 37(1): 26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S (2001) States of Denial. Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Couillard V (2007) The Nairobi Declaration: redefining reparation for women victims of sexual violence. Journal of Transitional Justice 1(3):444–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter C (2006) Being a Bush wife. Women´s Lives Through War and Peace in Northern Sierra Leone. Dissertation, Uppsala University.

  • de Greiff P (ed) (2006) The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Delpla I (2007) In the Midst of Injustice. The ICTY from the Perspective of Some Victim Associations. In: Bougarel X, Helms E and Duijzings G (eds) The New Bosnian Mosaic. Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society. Ashgate, Aldershot

  • Dogwoof Pictures (2006) Esma’s Secret – Grbavica. Directed by Jasmila Zbanic

  • Drumbl MA (2007) Atrocity, Punishment and International Law. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franke KM (2006) Gendered subjects of transitional justice. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 15 (3): 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M (2004) Bosnia and Herzegovina: Selected Developments in Transitional Justice. Case Studies Series, International Center for Transitional Justice

  • Grina EM (2011) Mainstreaming gender in rule of law initiatives in post-conflict settings. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law 17(2): 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamber B, Sevcenko L and Naidu E (2010) Utopian dreams or practical possibilities? The challenges of evaluating the impact of memorialization in societies in transition. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 4: 397–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen L (2000) Gender, Nation, Rape. Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics 3(1):55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry N (2010) The impossibility of bearing witness: wartime rape and the promise of justice. Violence against Women 16: 1098–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S (2004) This Is Not Our Way: Bosnian Women Reclaiming the Peace. Duke University Press, Durham NC

  • Husanovic J (2009) The politics of gender, witnessing post-coloniality, and trauma, Feminist Theory, 10(1): 99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICTY (22 February 2001) Judgment, Prosecutor v. Kunarac et al. Case No: IT-96-23/1.

  • ICTY (4 April 2007) Judgment, Prosecutor v. Dragan Zelenovic, Case No: IT-96-23/2-S.

  • Impunity Watch (2012) War Victims and Gender Sensitive Truth, Justice Reparations and Non-Recurrence in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

  • Jacoby T (2006) From the Trenches: Dilemmas of Feminist IR Fieldwork in B Ackerly, M Stern and J True (eds) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kritz NJ (2002) Progress and humility: the on-going search for post-conflict justice. In: Bassiouni MC (ed) Post-Conflict Justice. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronsell A (2006) Methods for studying Silences: Gender Analysis in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity in B Ackerly, M Stern and J True (eds) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 108–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDowell S (2008) Commemorating dead “men”: gendering the past and present in post-conflict Northern Ireland. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 15 (4): 335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannergren Selimovic J (2010) Victims and perpetrators: local responses to the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Focaal 57: 50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannergren Selimovic J, A Söderberg Jacobson and Å Nyquist Brandt (2012) Equal Power - Lasting Peace. Obstacles for Women’s Participation in Peace Processes. Stockholm: Kvinna till Kvinna.

  • Martin Ortega O (2013) Transitional Justice in the Quest for Just and Durable Peace in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in Aggestam K and Björkdahl A ed. Rethinking Peacebuilding: The Quest for just peace in the Middle East and the Western Balkans. Routledge, London, New York

  • Medica Mondiale (December 2009) "…and that it does not happen to anyone anywhere in the world." The Trouble with Rape Trials - Views of Witnesses, Prosecutors and Judges on Prosecuting Sexualised Violence during the War in the former Yugoslavia

  • Meintjes S, Pillay A and Turshen M (eds) (2001) The Aftermath: Women in Post conflict Societies. Zed Books, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertus J (2000) The truth in a box: the limits of justice through judicial mechanisms. In: Amadiume I, Abdullahi A (eds) The Politics of Memory, Truth, Healing and Social Justice. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertus J (2004) Shouting from the Bottom of the Well. The Impact of International

  • Ní Aoláin F Haynes DF and Cahn N (2011) On the Frontlines. Gender, War, and the Post-Conflict Process. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ní Aoláin F (2012) Advancing feminist positioning in the field of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 6 (2): 205–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nollkaemper A (2009) The contribution of international institutions to domestic reparations for international crimes. American Society of International Law Proceedings 203: 203–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr W (2000) Reparation delayed is healing retarded. In: Villa-Vicencio C and Verwoerd W (eds) Looking Back Reaching Forward: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Zed Books, New York, pp 239–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Rome statute of the International Criminal Court: http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm

  • Ross FC (2001) Speech and silence: women’s testimony in the first 5 weeks of public hearings of the South African truth and reconciliation commission. In: Das V and Kleinman A (eds) Remaking a World. Violence, Social Suffering and Recovery. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Marín R (2009) The Gender of Reparation in Transitional Societies: In Rubio_Marín R (ed) The Gender of Reparations, Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press, New York, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Marín R (2006a) Introduction: The Gender of Reparations: Setting the Agenda. In: Rubio-Marín R (ed) What happened to the women? Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations. International Center for Transitional Justice

  • Rubio-Marín R (ed) (2006b) What happened to the women? Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations. International Center for Transitional Justice

  • Rubio-Marín R, de Greiff P (2007) Women and Reparation. International Journal of Transitional Justice (1) 318–337

  • Rubio-Marín R (2009a) Introduction: a gender and reparations taxonomy. In: Rubio-Marín R (ed) The Gender of Reparations, Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press, New York, Cambridge

  • Rubio-Marín R (ed) (2009b) The Gender of Reparations, Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press, New York, Cambridge

  • Simpson G, Hodžic E, Bickford L (2012) Looking Back, Looking Forward. Promoting Truth-seeking in Bosnia Herzegovina. UNDP, Sarajevo

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg L (2006) Gender Justice and the Wars in Iraq. Lexington Books, New York, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg L and Gentry CE (2008) Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. Zeed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover E (2004) Witnesses and the promise of justice in the Hague. In: Stover E, Weinstein HM (eds) My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel RG (2000) Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (15 Dec 2011) ‘Angelina Jolie touched our souls’ – Bosnian Rape Victims have their Say. http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2011/dec/15/angelina-jolie-bosnia-rape-victims, accessed 12 March 2013

  • TRIAL (April 2012) Freed, but not Free Yet! The Situation of the Former Camp Detainees in Bosnia and Herzegovina. General allegation to the special rapporteur on torture, and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and the working group on arbitrary detention. Sarajevo, Geneva

  • United Nations (13 January 2012) Conflict-related sexual violence. Report of the Secretary General. A/66/657*-S/2012/33

  • Valji N with Sigsworth R and Goetz AM (2010) A Window of Opportunity?

  • Väyrynen T (2010) Gender and peacebuilding. In: Richmond OP (ed) Palgraves advances in peacebuilding: critical developments and approaches. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis N (2008) Gender & Nation. SAGE Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarkov D (2007) The Body of War. Duke University Press, Durham and London

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Mannergren Selimovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Björkdahl, A., Mannergren Selimovic, J. Gendered Justice Gaps in Bosnia–Herzegovina. Hum Rights Rev 15, 201–218 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013-0286-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013-0286-y

Keywords

Navigation