Advertisement

Human Rights Review

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 201–218 | Cite as

Gendered Justice Gaps in Bosnia–Herzegovina

  • Annika Björkdahl
  • Johanna Mannergren Selimovic
Article

Abstract

A gendered reading of the liberal peacebuilding and transitional justice project in Bosnia–Herzegovina raises critical questions concerning the quality of the peace one hopes to achieve in transitional societies. By focusing on three-gendered justice gaps—the accountability, acknowledgement, and reparations gaps—this article examines structural constraints for women to engage in shaping and implementing transitional justice, and unmasks transitional justice as a site for the long-term construction of the gendered post-conflict order. Thus, the gendered dynamics of peacebuilding and transitional justice have produced a post-conflict order characterized by gendered peace and justice gaps. Yet, we conclude that women are doing justice within the Bosnian–Herzegovina transitional justice project, and that their presence and participation is complex, multilayered, and constrained yet critical.

Keywords

Gender Gender-just peace Transitional justice Bosnia–Herzegovina Critical agency 

References

  1. BBC News (1 October 2004) Bosnian Serbs Reject Rape Plaque. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3706554.stm, accessed 19 Aug, 2010
  2. Bell C, O’Rourke C (2007) Does feminism need a theory of transitional justice? an introductory essay. International Journal of Transitional Justice 1: 23–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Björkdahl A (2012) A gender-just peace? Exploring the post-Dayton peace process in Bosnia. Peace and Change 37 (2): 171–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buckley-Zistel S, Zolkos M (2012) Introduction: Gender in Transitional Justice in Buckley-Zistel S, Stanley R (eds) Gender and Transitional Justice. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke HoundmillsGoogle Scholar
  5. Cockburn C (2013) Against the odds—sustaining feminist momentum in post-war Bosni–Herzegovina. Women’s Studies International Forum 37(1): 26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen S (2001) States of Denial. Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Couillard V (2007) The Nairobi Declaration: redefining reparation for women victims of sexual violence. Journal of Transitional Justice 1(3):444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coulter C (2006) Being a Bush wife. Women´s Lives Through War and Peace in Northern Sierra Leone. Dissertation, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  9. de Greiff P (ed) (2006) The Handbook of Reparations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Delpla I (2007) In the Midst of Injustice. The ICTY from the Perspective of Some Victim Associations. In: Bougarel X, Helms E and Duijzings G (eds) The New Bosnian Mosaic. Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  11. Dogwoof Pictures (2006) Esma’s Secret – Grbavica. Directed by Jasmila ZbanicGoogle Scholar
  12. Drumbl MA (2007) Atrocity, Punishment and International Law. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Franke KM (2006) Gendered subjects of transitional justice. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law 15 (3): 1Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, M (2004) Bosnia and Herzegovina: Selected Developments in Transitional Justice. Case Studies Series, International Center for Transitional JusticeGoogle Scholar
  15. Grina EM (2011) Mainstreaming gender in rule of law initiatives in post-conflict settings. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law 17(2): 40Google Scholar
  16. Hamber B, Sevcenko L and Naidu E (2010) Utopian dreams or practical possibilities? The challenges of evaluating the impact of memorialization in societies in transition. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 4: 397–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen L (2000) Gender, Nation, Rape. Bosnia and the Construction of Security. International Feminist Journal of Politics 3(1):55–75Google Scholar
  18. Henry N (2010) The impossibility of bearing witness: wartime rape and the promise of justice. Violence against Women 16: 1098–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt S (2004) This Is Not Our Way: Bosnian Women Reclaiming the Peace. Duke University Press, Durham NCGoogle Scholar
  20. Husanovic J (2009) The politics of gender, witnessing post-coloniality, and trauma, Feminist Theory, 10(1): 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ICTY (22 February 2001) Judgment, Prosecutor v. Kunarac et al. Case No: IT-96-23/1.Google Scholar
  22. ICTY (4 April 2007) Judgment, Prosecutor v. Dragan Zelenovic, Case No: IT-96-23/2-S.Google Scholar
  23. Impunity Watch (2012) War Victims and Gender Sensitive Truth, Justice Reparations and Non-Recurrence in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Google Scholar
  24. Jacoby T (2006) From the Trenches: Dilemmas of Feminist IR Fieldwork in B Ackerly, M Stern and J True (eds) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 153–173.Google Scholar
  25. Kritz NJ (2002) Progress and humility: the on-going search for post-conflict justice. In: Bassiouni MC (ed) Post-Conflict Justice. Transnational Publishers, ArdsleyGoogle Scholar
  26. Kronsell A (2006) Methods for studying Silences: Gender Analysis in Institutions of Hegemonic Masculinity in B Ackerly, M Stern and J True (eds) Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 108–128.Google Scholar
  27. MacDowell S (2008) Commemorating dead “men”: gendering the past and present in post-conflict Northern Ireland. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 15 (4): 335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mannergren Selimovic J (2010) Victims and perpetrators: local responses to the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Focaal 57: 50–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mannergren Selimovic J, A Söderberg Jacobson and Å Nyquist Brandt (2012) Equal Power - Lasting Peace. Obstacles for Women’s Participation in Peace Processes. Stockholm: Kvinna till Kvinna.Google Scholar
  30. Martin Ortega O (2013) Transitional Justice in the Quest for Just and Durable Peace in Bosnia-Herzegovina, in Aggestam K and Björkdahl A ed. Rethinking Peacebuilding: The Quest for just peace in the Middle East and the Western Balkans. Routledge, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Medica Mondiale (December 2009) "…and that it does not happen to anyone anywhere in the world." The Trouble with Rape Trials - Views of Witnesses, Prosecutors and Judges on Prosecuting Sexualised Violence during the War in the former YugoslaviaGoogle Scholar
  32. Meintjes S, Pillay A and Turshen M (eds) (2001) The Aftermath: Women in Post conflict Societies. Zed Books, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Mertus J (2000) The truth in a box: the limits of justice through judicial mechanisms. In: Amadiume I, Abdullahi A (eds) The Politics of Memory, Truth, Healing and Social Justice. Zed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Mertus J (2004) Shouting from the Bottom of the Well. The Impact of InternationalGoogle Scholar
  35. Ní Aoláin F Haynes DF and Cahn N (2011) On the Frontlines. Gender, War, and the Post-Conflict Process. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ní Aoláin F (2012) Advancing feminist positioning in the field of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 6 (2): 205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nollkaemper A (2009) The contribution of international institutions to domestic reparations for international crimes. American Society of International Law Proceedings 203: 203–201Google Scholar
  38. Orr W (2000) Reparation delayed is healing retarded. In: Villa-Vicencio C and Verwoerd W (eds) Looking Back Reaching Forward: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Zed Books, New York, pp 239–49Google Scholar
  39. Rome statute of the International Criminal Court: http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm
  40. Ross FC (2001) Speech and silence: women’s testimony in the first 5 weeks of public hearings of the South African truth and reconciliation commission. In: Das V and Kleinman A (eds) Remaking a World. Violence, Social Suffering and Recovery. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  41. Rubio-Marín R (2009) The Gender of Reparation in Transitional Societies: In Rubio_Marín R (ed) The Gender of Reparations, Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press, New York, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rubio-Marín R (2006a) Introduction: The Gender of Reparations: Setting the Agenda. In: Rubio-Marín R (ed) What happened to the women? Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations. International Center for Transitional JusticeGoogle Scholar
  43. Rubio-Marín R (ed) (2006b) What happened to the women? Gender and Reparations for Human Rights Violations. International Center for Transitional JusticeGoogle Scholar
  44. Rubio-Marín R, de Greiff P (2007) Women and Reparation. International Journal of Transitional Justice (1) 318–337Google Scholar
  45. Rubio-Marín R (2009a) Introduction: a gender and reparations taxonomy. In: Rubio-Marín R (ed) The Gender of Reparations, Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press, New York, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Rubio-Marín R (ed) (2009b) The Gender of Reparations, Sexual Hierarchies while Redressing Human Rights Violations. Cambridge University Press, New York, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Simpson G, Hodžic E, Bickford L (2012) Looking Back, Looking Forward. Promoting Truth-seeking in Bosnia Herzegovina. UNDP, SarajevoGoogle Scholar
  48. Sjoberg L (2006) Gender Justice and the Wars in Iraq. Lexington Books, New York, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Sjoberg L and Gentry CE (2008) Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. Zeed Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Stover E (2004) Witnesses and the promise of justice in the Hague. In: Stover E, Weinstein HM (eds) My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity, Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teitel RG (2000) Transitional Justice. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. The Guardian (15 Dec 2011) ‘Angelina Jolie touched our souls’ – Bosnian Rape Victims have their Say. http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2011/dec/15/angelina-jolie-bosnia-rape-victims, accessed 12 March 2013
  53. TRIAL (April 2012) Freed, but not Free Yet! The Situation of the Former Camp Detainees in Bosnia and Herzegovina. General allegation to the special rapporteur on torture, and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and the working group on arbitrary detention. Sarajevo, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations (13 January 2012) Conflict-related sexual violence. Report of the Secretary General. A/66/657*-S/2012/33Google Scholar
  55. Valji N with Sigsworth R and Goetz AM (2010) A Window of Opportunity?Google Scholar
  56. Väyrynen T (2010) Gender and peacebuilding. In: Richmond OP (ed) Palgraves advances in peacebuilding: critical developments and approaches. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  57. Yuval-Davis N (2008) Gender & Nation. SAGE Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  58. Zarkov D (2007) The Body of War. Duke University Press, Durham and LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Björkdahl
    • 1
  • Johanna Mannergren Selimovic
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.The Swedish Institute Of International AffairsStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations