Human Rights Review

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 231–239 | Cite as

Reparations and Peacebuilding: Issues and Controversies

Article

Abstract

This introduction to our special section of Human Rights Review on Reparations and Peacebuilding gives an overview of the challenges currently confronting both peacebuilding and reparations. The special section aims to explore the relationship between these two mechanisms and examines the role that reparations schemes can play in salving or exacerbating conflict.

Keywords

Reparations Peacebuilding Transitional justice Conflict 

References

  1. Adhikari, P. et al. (2012) The Demand for Reparations: Grievance, Risk, and the Pursuit of Justice in Civil War Settlement. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(2): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carranza, R (2008) Plunder and Pain: Should Transitional Justice Engage with Corruption and Economic Crimes? International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(3): 310–330.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, S, Chandler D, and Sabaratnam M, eds., (2011) A Liberal Peace? The problems and practices of peacebuilding. Zed Books, London.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, R. 1981. Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium, 10(2): 126–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duthie, R (2008) Toward a development-sensitive approach to transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 292–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gurr, TR (2010) Why Men Rebel. Fortieth Anniversary Issue. Paradigm Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. International Dialogue on Peacebuilding and Statebuilding (2011) A New Deal for Engagement in Fragile States. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Korpi, W (1974) Conflict, Power and relative Deprivation. American Political Science Review, 68, 4, 1569–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lederach, JP (1996) Preparing for Peace: Conflict Transformation across Cultures. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.Google Scholar
  10. Lundy, P & McGovern M (2008) Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up. Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 35: 2: 265–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lambourne, W (2009) Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding after Mass Violence. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 3, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laplante, LJ (2008) Transitional Justice and Peace Building: Diagnosing and addressing the socioeconomic roots of violence through a human rights framework. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 2: 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mac Ginty, R (2012) Routine Peace: Technocracy and peacebuilding, Cooperation and Conflict, 47, 3: 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mac Ginty, R and Richmond O (2013) The Local Turn in Peacebuilding: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34, 5, 763–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mani, R (2008) Editorial: Dilemmas of expanding transitional justice, or forging the nexus between transitional justice and development. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, Z (2008) Effects of invisibility: In search of the ‘economic’ in transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 266–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Muvingi, I (2009) Sitting on powder kegs: Socioeconomic rights in transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice 2: 266–299.Google Scholar
  18. Olsen, TD, Payne LA and Reiter AG. (2010) Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  19. PAM (2013) Peace Accords Matrix. University of Notre Dame. https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/.
  20. Ryan, S (2013) The evolution of peacebuilding In: Mac Ginty R, ed., Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding, Routledge, London, pp. 25–35Google Scholar
  21. Pugh, M (2013) The problem-solving and critical paradigms. In: Mac Ginty, R ed., Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding, Routledge, London, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
  22. Roht-Arriaza N and Orlovsky K. (2009) A Complementary Relationship: Reparations and development. In; de Greiff P and Duthi R (eds) Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections. Social Science Research Council and the International Center for Transitional Justice, New York, pp. 170–213Google Scholar
  23. Spiegel. 2013. Germany to pay 772 million Euros to survivors. Spiegel International Online, 29 May. Accessed at http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-to-pay-772-million-euros-in-reparations-to-holocaust-survivors-a-902528.html
  24. Sriram, Lekha, C and García-Godos, J et al. eds. (2012) Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding on the Ground: Victims and Ex-Combatants, Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations (2005) Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law: resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly in December 2005, published on 21 March 2006, A/RES/60/147 http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4721cb942.html (Accessed April 20, 2012).
  26. United Nations (1998) Rome Statute, http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/99_corr/cstatute.htm (Accessed April 20, 2012).
  27. UNDP (2012), Governance for Peace: Securing the social contract, New York: UNDP. Accessed at: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/crisis-prevention-and-recovery/governance_for_peacesecuringthesocialcontract.html
  28. Waldorf, L (2012) Anticipating the Past: Transitional Justice and Socio-Economic Wrongs. Social & Legal Studies, 21 (2): 171–186.Google Scholar
  29. Wanis-St. John, A (2013) Indigenous Peacebuilding. In: Mac Ginty, R ed., Routledge Handbook of Peacebuilding. Routledge, London, pp. 360–374Google Scholar
  30. World Bank (2011) World Development Report: Conflict, Security and Development, Washington, D.C: World Bank. Available at http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTWDRS/0,,contentMDK:23252415~pagePK:478093~piPK:477627~theSitePK:477624,00.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations