Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resource Allocation Towards Socioeconomic Rights: Lessons from Domestic Courts

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of resource allocation is particularly pertinent to the realisation of socioeconomic rights. Perceptions of the place of resource allocation impact the adjudication of these rights. This article departs from the premise that with the adoption of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural rights allowing individual communications and the establishment of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights, there will be an increase in resource allocation questions for adjudication. The article interrogates the experience of national courts and examines potential lessons that can be adopted at the international level to overcome the reluctance that supra-national tribunals may have when adjudicating on states obligations to fulfil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brand, D (2005) ‘Introduction to socio-economic rights in the South African Constitution’ in Brand, D & Heyns, C (eds) Socio-economic rights in South Africa 1–56 Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brems, E (1996) ‘The margin of appreciation doctrine in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights’ Heidelb J of Int Law 56:240–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York et al (2001) 719 NYS 2d 475(No II)

  • Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York et al (2006) NYSlipOP 08630 (No III)

  • Case concerning the military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (1986) Merits Judgment of 27 June 1986 International Court of Justice

  • Case ‘Relating to Certain Aspects of the Laws on the Use of Languages in Education in Belgium’ v Belgium (Belgian Linguistics case) (1968) Application Nos 1474/62, 1677/62, 1691/62, 1796/62, 1994/63, 2126/64, Judgment of 23 July 1968

  • CESCR General Comment 9 The domestic application of the Covenant 3 December 1998 E/C.12/1998/24

  • CESCR Statement ‘An evaluation of the obligation to take steps to the “maximum of available resources” under and optional protocol to the Covenant’ 10 May 2007 E/C 12/2007/1

  • Craven, M (2002) ‘The international covenant on economic social and cultural rights’ in Hanski, R & Suksi, M (eds) An introduction to the international protection of human rights: A textbook 101–123 Turku: Institute for Human Rights, Abo Akademi University

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, VA (2011) ‘Taking from the poor to give to the rich: Individualistic enforcement of social rights’ <www.enelsyn.gr/papers/w13/Paper%20by%20Prof.%20Virgilio%20Afonso%20da%20Silva.pdf>

  • Davis, DM (1992) ‘The case against the inclusion of socio-economic demands in a bill of rights except as directive principles’ S Afr J on Hum Rights 8: 475–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, MJ & Stewart, DP (2004) ‘Justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights: Should there be an international complaints mechanism to adjudicate the rights to food, water, housing, and health?’ Am J of Int Law 98:462–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R (2007) ‘Creating dialogue about socioeconomic rights: Strong-form versus weak-form judicial review revisited’ Int J of Const L 5:391–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R (2009) ‘The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter dialogue and deference’ Osgoode Hall L J 47:235–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J (2002) ‘Right to food: From the courts to the streets’ <www.sccommissioners.org/Starvation/Articles/drezecourts.pdf>

  • Eide, A (2001) ‘Economic, social and cultural rights as human rights’ in Eide, A; Krause, C & Rosas, A (eds) Economic social and cultural rights: A textbook 9–28 Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Faracik, B (2006) ‘ “Constructive dialogue” as the cornerstone of the human rights treaty bodies supervision’ Bracton Law J 38:39–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz, OLM (2009a) ‘Right to health litigation in Brazil: An overview of the research’ <www.ssrn.com/abstract=1426011>

  • Ferraz, OLM (2009b) ‘The right to health in the courts of Brazil: Worsening health inequities?’ Health and Hum Rights 11:33–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredman, S (2008) Human rights transformed: Positive rights and positive duties Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, LL (1978) ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’ Harv Law Rev 92:353–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin v. Quebec (Attorney General) (2002) 4 S.C.R. 429, 2002 SCC 84

  • Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others (CCT11/00) [2000] ZACC 19; 2001 (1) SA 46; 2000 (11) BCLR 1169

  • Haysom, N (1992) ‘Constitutionalism, majoritarian democracy and socio-economic rights’ S Afr J on Hum Rights 8:451–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood M (2005) ‘Shaping, making and breaking the law in the Campaign for a national HIV/AIDS treatment plan’ in Jones, P & Stokke, K (eds) Democratising development: The politics of socio-economic rights in South Africa 181–212 Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, FF & Bentes FRNM (2008) ‘Accountability for social and economic rights in Brazil’ in Gauri, V & Brinks DM (eds) Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world 100–145 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • International Association Autism Europe v France (2003) Complaint No 13/2002 Decision adopted 4 November 2003

  • Kapczynski, A & Berger, J (2009) ‘The story of the TAC Case: The potential and limits of socio-economic rights litigation in South Africa’ in Hurwitz, D R & Satterthwaite M L. (eds) Human rights advocacy stories (New York: Foundation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Khatri(II) v State of Bihar (1981) 1 SCC 627, 631

  • Khosa v Minister of Social Development (2004) 6 BCLR 569 (CC)

  • King, JA (2007) ‘The justiciability of resource allocation’ Mod L Rev 70 (2): 197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M (2008) ‘The justiciability of social rights: From practice to theory’ in Langford, M Social rights jurisprudence: Emerging trends in international and comparative law 3–45 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M & Nolan, A (2006) ‘Litigating economic, social and cultural rights: Legal practitioners dossier’ Geneva: ESC Rights Litigation Programme Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebenberg, S (2005) ‘The interpretation of socio-economic rights’ in Woolman, S; Roux, T; Klaaren, J; Stein, A; Chaskalson, M & Bishop, M (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa ch33 Cape Town: Juta

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord Lester of Herne Hill & O’Cinneide, C (2004) ‘The effective protection of socio-economic rights’ in Ghai, Y & Cottrell, J (eds) Economic social and cultural rights in practice: The role of judges in implementing economic social and cultural rights 17–22 London: Interights

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, D (2006) ‘The normative development of socio-economic rights through supranational adjudication’ Stanf J of Int Law 42:53–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariela Viceconte v Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Case No 31.777/96 (1998) cited in Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE) Litigating economic, social and cultural rights: Achievements, challenges and strategies (2003)

  • McLean, K (2009) Constitutional deference: Courts and socio-economic rights in South Africa Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others 2002 (5) SA 721 (CC)

  • Mureinik, E (1992) ‘Beyond a charter of luxuries: Economic rights in the constitution’ S Afr J on Hum Rights 8:464–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Paschim Banga Khet Majoor Samity v State of West Bengal (1996) 4 SCC 37

  • Pieterse, M (2007) ‘Health care rights, resources and rationing’ 124 S Afr L J 514–536

    Google Scholar 

  • PUCL v Union of India & Others, Writ Petition (Civil) 196 of 2001

  • Purohit v The Gambia (2003) AHRLR 96 (ACHPR 2003)

  • R v Cambridge Health Authority Ex parte B (1995) 2 All ER 129

  • R v East Sussex Ex parte Tandy (1998) AC 714, [1998] 2 All ER 769

  • Right to Food Campaign ‘Supreme Court Orders in the right to food: A tool for action (2008) 7 available <www.righttofoodindia.org/data/scordersprimeratoolforaction.pdf> (accessed 7 January 2010).

  • Roux, T (2003) ‘Legitimating transformation: Political resource allocation in the South African Constitutional Court’ Democratisation 10:92–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C & Macklem, P (1992) ‘Constitutional ropes of sand or justiciable guarantees? Social rights in a new South African Constitution’ Univ of Pa Law Rev 141:1–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepulveda, MM (2003) The nature of the obligations under the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Antwerp: Intersentia

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, S & Mehta, PB (2008) ‘Constitutional and socioeconomic rights in India’ in Gauri, V & Brinks DM (eds) Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world 146–182 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shany, Y (2006) ‘Toward a general margin of appreciation doctrine in international law’ Eur J of Int Law 16:907–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldrick, BM (2003) ‘Judicial review and the allocation of health care resources in Canada and the United Kingdom’ J of Comp Policy Anal: Res and Pract 5:149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H (1980) Basic rights: Subsistence, affluence and US foreign policy Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H (1984) ‘The interdependence of duties’ in Alston, P & Tomasevski, K (eds) The right to food 83–95 Utrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A (1994) ‘A typology of transjudicial communication’ Richmond L Rev 29:99–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Soobramoney v Minister of Health, KwaZulu Natal (1998) (1) SA 765 (CC)

  • Social and Economic Rights Action Centre (SERAC) & Another v Nigeria (2001) AHRLR 60 (ACHPR 2001)

  • Supreme Court Commissioner CWP 196/2001 ‘Ninth Report of the Commissioners’ September 2009 available at www.righttofoodindia.org.

  • Tushnet M (2003a) ‘Alternative forms of judicial review’ Mich L Rev 101:2781–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushnet, M (2003b) ‘New forms of judicial review and the persistence of rights and democracy based worries’ Wake Forest L Rev 38:813–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron J (2006) ‘The core of the case against judicial review’ Yale L J 115:1346–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan de Vries v Netherlands (1987) Human Rights Committee 9 April 1987

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the reviewers at Human Rights Review for their helpful comments. All errors remain the author’s.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa

    Waruguru Kaguongo

Authors
  1. Waruguru Kaguongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waruguru Kaguongo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaguongo, W. Resource Allocation Towards Socioeconomic Rights: Lessons from Domestic Courts. Hum Rights Rev 13, 85–105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-011-0203-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-011-0203-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation