Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peace Operations and the Prevention of Genocide

  • Published:
Human Rights Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article discusses the potential and limitations of peace operations in the prevention of genocide. Peace operations encompass a wide range of military and police actions with nontraditional military goals, typically taken under multilateral auspices. These operations have grown in number and complexity in recent years, and current trends point to their playing an ever-growing role with respect to genocide prevention. Despite some progress, there are several significant obstacles to ensuring that peace operations reliably contribute to the prevention of mass atrocities. These include international political dissension, capacity constraints, limits of the military option, and demands of the post-conflict period. If properly designed and resourced, however, peace operations can be an important tool for genocide prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Annan, Kofi. 1999. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 53/55: The Fall of Srebrenica. New York: United Nations. 113 pp.

  • Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1995. An Agenda for Peace, 1995: With the New Supplement and Related UN Documents. New York: United Nations. 159 pp.

  • Cockayne, James, and David M.Malone. 2005. “The Ralph Bunche Centennial: Peace Operations Then and Now.” Global Governance, 11 (3).

  • Durch, William J., Victoria K.Holt, Caroline R.Earle, and Moira K.Shanahan. 2003. The Brahimi Report and the Future of UN Peace Operations. Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center. 142 pp.

  • Haspeslagh, Sophie. 2003. “Safe Havens.” n. p. In Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess (eds.). Beyond Intractability. Boulder, CO: Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado.

  • Holt, Victoria K. 2005. The Responsibility to Protect: Considering the Operational Capacity for Civilian Protection. Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center. 62 pp.

  • International Crisis Group. 2005. Darfur: The Failure to Protect. Nairobi/Brussels: International Crisis Group. 28 pp.

  • Kent, Vanessa and Mark Malan. 2003. “The African Standby Force: Progress and Prospects.” African Security Review, 12 (3), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. 2005. 2005 World Summit Outcome. New York: United Nations. 40 pp.

  • United Nations Peacekeeping Best Practices Unit. 2003. Handbook on United Nations Multidimensional Peacekeeping Operations. New York: United Nations. 205 pp.

Annotated Bibliography

  • Annan, Kofi. 1999. Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 53/55: The Fall of Srebrenica. New York: United Nations. 113 pp. This report details the events leading up to the massacres in the “safe area” of Srebrenica and concludes by addressing two questions: “How can this have been allowed to happen?” and “How will the United Nations ensure that no future peacekeeping operation witnesses such a calamity on its watch?” Annan attributes much of the failure to the fact that the UN “tried to keep the peace and apply rules of peacekeeping when there was no peace to keep.”

  • Black, George. 1993. Genocide in Iraq: the Anfal campaign against the Kurds. New York: Human Rights Watch. 370 pp. This report details the Iraqi government’s campaign to exterminate the Kurdish population of northern Iraq. It concludes these crimes constituted genocide.

  • Boulden, Jane. 2005. “Mandates Matter: An Exploration of Impartiality in United Nations Operations.” Global Governance, 11 (2): 147–160. The author argues that “the impartiality of a UN mandate needs to be considered separately from the impartiality of the implementation of that mandate.” Based on this analysis, the author finds contradictions in many UN peace operations that threaten their success.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1995. An Agenda for Peace, 1995: With the New Supplement and Related UN Documents. New York: United Nations. 159 pp. UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali produced his original An Agenda for Peace in 1992 to help improve the UN’s peace and security activities during this period of rapid change and escalating demand for peacekeeping missions. He developed a conceptual framework for the broader set of UN peace-related activities, including preventive diplomacy, peacemaking, peace enforcement, peacekeeping, and postconflict peacebuilding. Boutros-Ghali’s more sober Supplement to An Agenda for Peace (1995), less than 3 years later, more fully grasped the profound challenges facing UN peace operations. Reflecting intervening failures in Somalia, Bosnia, and Rwanda, he urged action to remedy problems including the blurring of the distinction between peacekeeping and peace enforcement, lack of unity of command, and lack of available troops and equipment.

  • Carlsson, Ingvar, Sung-Joo Han, and Rufus M. Kupolati. 1999. Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations During the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda. New York: United Nations. 82 pp. This report to the UN Secretary-General reviews the chronology of UN actions and failures to act in relation to the Rwandan genocide. It concludes that each part of the UN system shares responsibility for the overall failure: the Secretary-General, the Secretariat, the Security Council, and member states. The inquiry found that a lack of resources and political commitment was the fundamental failure.

  • Cockayne, James and David M. Malone. 2005. The Ralph Bunche Centennial: Peace Operations Then and Now. Global Governance, 11 (3). The authors review major changes in UN peace operations since their inception. They cite six causal factors: “the end of the Cold War; engagement with ‘internal’ conflicts; rising regional organizations; North–South politics; the US–UN relationship; and changes in peace operation mandates.” They also identify three future challenges: “state building; the reconception of sovereignty; and the need for realism.”

  • Dallaire, Romeo. 2003. Shake Hands with the Devil: The Failure of Humanity in Rwanda. Toronto: Random House Canada. 562 pp. This is the detailed account of the former head of the UN peacekeeping mission in Rwanda during the 1994 genocide.

  • Des Forges, Alison. 1999. “Leave None to Tell the Story”: Genocide in Rwanda. New York: Human Rights Watch. 789 pp. This indispensable study of the Rwandan genocide by a former Human Rights Watch researcher includes, among other things, a detailed account of the actions of the UN peacekeeping mission in Rwanda.

  • Donald, D. 2002. “Neutrality, Impartiality and UN Peacekeeping at the Beginning of the 21st Century.” International Peacekeeping, 9 (4), 21–38. This article examines the UN effort to clarify and update the principles of neutrality and impartiality. The author finds continued confusion, posing a threat to UN peace operations in difficult political contexts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durch, William J., Victoria K. Holt, Caroline R. Earle, and Moira K. Shanahan. 2003. The Brahimi Report and the Future of UN Peace Operations. Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center. 142 pp. This report was authored by the former staff director of the Brahimi panel to provide an analysis of the implementation of the recommendations found in the “Brahimi Report” 3 years on. The authors conclude that the UN had “demonstrated clear progress in implementing a majority of reforms” and that “more concrete and operational recommendations, implementable by the UN bureaucracy, fared better than those pitched at the level of doctrine or strategy or those addressed to the member states themselves.” The review is organized by doctrine and strategy, capacity for operations, and rapid and effective deployment.

  • Feil, Scott R. 1998. Preventing Genocide: How the Early Use of Force Might Have Succeeded in Rwanda. Washington, DC: Carnegie Corporation of New York. 70 pp. This report, based on the proceedings of a conference sponsored by the Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, analyzes the details of a military response aimed at halting the genocide in Rwanda: mandate, type and size of force, and operational plans. It elaborates on the much-discussed request by Lt. General Romeo Dallaire for a force of 5,000 well-armed troops as well as an alternative operational plan. Conference participants concluded, “The hypothetical force described by General Dallaire could have made a significant difference.”

  • Findlay, Trevor. 2002. The Use of Force in UN Peace Operations. New York: Oxford University Press. 486 pp. This book reviews how UN peacekeeping missions have managed the use of force, from the UN’s first mission through East Timor and Sierra Leone. He finds mandates, rules of engagement, operational guidelines, etc. concerning the use of force have generally been ineffective and concludes with a wide-ranging set of recommendations.

  • Haspeslagh, Sophie. 2003. “Safe Havens,” n.p. In Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess (eds.), Beyond Intractability. Boulder, CO: Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado. This is a study of the use of safe havens and safe areas as a response to refugee crises, including brief case studies on Iraq, Rwanda, and Bosnia.

  • Holt, Victoria K. 2005. The Responsibility to Protect: Considering the Operational Capacity for Civilian Protection. Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center. 62 pp. Following on the work of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, this working paper explores a single, important, and complex question: “What current doctrines, training programs, simulation exercises, rules of engagement or other tools prepare forces to intervene and protect civilians from mass killings, ethnic cleansing or genocide in nonpermissive, Chapter VII environments?” The analysis, based on dozens of interviews with official and unofficial experts on peace operations, seeks to identify gaps in the international community’s capacity and points to preliminary strategies for narrowing these. The paper also includes a useful matrix excerpting key information on UN Security Council resolutions for missions involving aspects of civilian protection.

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. 2001. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre. 91 pp. Established by the Canadian government, this panel studied the tensions between state sovereignty and what was argued to be a right of the international community to intervene in cases of genocide or mass atrocities. Cochaired by former Australian foreign minister Gareth Evans and former senior Algerian diplomat Mohammed Sahnoun, the Commission developed the idea of “responsibility to protect” as an alternative to the right of intervention versus sovereignty debate. Chapter 7 discusses “The Operational Dimension,” including recommendations on mandate, resources, command structure, rules of engagement, etc.

  • Kuperman, Alan J. 2001. The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention: Genocide in Rwanda. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. 162 pp. The author argues that even had the US launched a maximal military intervention to stop the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, at best it could have saved 125,000 Tutsi lives or one quarter of the total actually killed. His conclusion is based mainly on four premises: the delay before the US president could have confidently judged that genocide was underway; the time required to airlift an intervention force to remote, landlocked Rwanda; the speed of the genocide; and the incentives for the perpetrators to accelerate their killing if armed intervention was being mobilized.

  • O’Hanlon, Michael and P.W.Singer. 2004. “The Humanitarian Transformation: Expanding Global Intervention Capacity.” Survival, 46 (1), 77–100. The authors find the global supply of “projectable military forces” suitable for humanitarian protection missions to be inadequate to foreseeable future needs. By the authors’ count, the US accounts for 62% of rapidly deployable forces, while non-NATO countries account for just 6%. They analyze what would be required to narrow the gap between military capabilities and humanitarian needs and outline an action agenda that they characterize as “difficult but not so daunting or expensive as to excuse inaction.” Specifically, they call on European countries and Japan to enhance their capabilities and to make use of private military service contractors for transport, logistics, etc.

  • O’Neill, John Terence, and Nick Rees. 2005. United Nations Peacekeeping in the Post-Cold War Era. London: Routledge. 256 pp. This work includes case studies of UN peace operations in the Congo, Cyprus, Somalia, Angola, Sierra Leone, and East Timor and a conclusion examining reforms following the “Brahimi Report”.

  • Posen, Barry R. 1996. “Military Responses to Refugee Disasters.” International Security, 21 (1), 472–111. The author argues that military action will generally be significantly less successful at preventing or halting forced refugee crises, which often result from genocidal crimes, than is commonly assumed. He discusses military actions such as punitive bombing, truce enforcement, and the establishment of safe zones or safe havens.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, Samantha. 2002. "A Problem from Hell": America and the Age of Genocide. New York: Basic Books. 640 pp. An important analysis of American responses to genocide in the 20th Century, Power’s book includes detailed case studies of policy deliberations related to crises in Armenia, Cambodia, Iraq, Bosnia, Rwanda, and Kosovo. Her analysis of primary documents and interviews with American policymakers offers unique insight into how the US government formulated its response, including how peace operations were perceived and used.

  • Schnabel, Albrecht and Ramesh Thakur. (eds.). 2000. Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation, Collective Action and International Citizenship. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. 536 pp. This edited volume, produced soon after the Kosovo crisis, contains 20 short essays organized into seven parts, including reflections on the NATO intervention and its implications from a variety of national and political perspectives.

  • Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. “Help Develop Institutions and Instruments for Military Intervention on Humanitarian Grounds.” In Open Society Institute and Security and Peace Institute (eds.), Restoring American Leadership: 13 Cooperative Steps to Advance Global Progress. New York: Open Society Institute and The Century Foundation. pp. 37–43. This short essay calls on the Bush administration to take steps to create instruments and institutions specifically for military intervention to protect civilians, e.g., explore the feasibility of “a NATO rapid-reaction force specially trained and ready for intervention in humanitarian crises.”

  • Stephens, Dale. 2005. “The Lawful Use of Force by Peacekeeping Forces: The Tactical Imperative.” International Peacekeeping, 12 (2), 157–172. This article analyzes difficulties in assuring that tactical guidelines for the use of force in UN peace operations are appropriate, consistent with Security Council mandates, and adhered to by national contingents. The author proposes reforms to address these highly consequential tactical-level issues.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Task Force on the United Nations. 2005. American Interests and UN Reform: Report of the Task Force on the United Nations. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace. 145 pp. This report of a congressionally mandated study led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell is an important statement of bipartisan American views on the UN. Its second chapter, “Saving Lives, Safeguarding Human Rights, and Ending Genocide”, includes recommendations to the US government on general policies for genocide prevention and on Darfur specifically (e.g., that the US should assist in establishing a no-fly zone over Darfur). Chapter 5 includes analysis and recommendations for UN peace operations.

  • The Challenges Project. 2002. Challenges of Peace Operations: Into the 21st Century – Concluding Report 1997–2002. Stockholm, Sweden: Elanders Gotab. 295 pp. This report offers a thorough review of current issues based on a collaborative project launched by the Swedish government. It covers topics including doctrine, integrating the human rights perspective, preventive action, civil–military relations, etc. The project issued another major report in late 2005, available on-line at www.challengesproject.net.

  • United Nations. 2000. Report of the Panel on United Nations Peace Operations. New York: United Nations. 74 pp. Known as the “Brahimi Report” after the chair of the high-level panel that UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan commissioned, this detailed report analyzes the ability of the UN to conduct peace operations effectively and makes wide-ranging recommendations to strengthen this ability. The report has become the touchstone for nearly all subsequent analysis and reform efforts related to UN peace operations. It begins with a forthright argument that the UN must change the way it thinks about and conducts peace operations to meet changing demands, particularly to take account of the complex or multidimensional peace operations that were becoming more prevalent at the time. The report urges specific actions in four broad areas: doctrine, strategy, and decision-making; UN capacities to deploy operations rapidly and effectively; headquarters resources and structure for planning and supporting peacekeeping operations; and peace operations and the information age.

  • United Nations High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change. 2004. A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility: Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change. New York: United Nations. 129 pp. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan commissioned this study following the sharp debate about the US-led war in Iraq in 2003, judging that the world needed to forge a new consensus on collective security. He charged this panel with analyzing current security threats and recommending actions to strengthen collective responses. This report offers no fewer than 101 recommendations, including calling on the UN General Assembly to endorse the “responsibility to protect” and a number in the area of peace operations.

  • United Nations Peacekeeping Best Practices Unit 2003. Handbook on United Nations Multidimensional Peacekeeping Operations. New York: United Nations. 205 pp. The UN Department of Peacekeeping Operations produced this useful resource “to serve as an introduction to the different components of multidimensional peacekeeping operations” for personnel being deployed to UN missions.

  • Van Baarda, T., and F.van Iersel. 2002. “The Uneasy Relationship Between Conscience and Military Law: The ‘Brahimi Report’s’ Unresolved Dilemma.” International Peacekeeping, 9 (3), 25–50. This article discusses the consequences of the “Brahimi Report’s” recommendation that peacekeepers should be presumed to be authorized to stop violence against civilians, focusing on the tensions between this presumption and established military law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenko, Micah. 2004. Saving Lives with Speed: Using Rapidly Deployable Forces for Genocide Prevention. Defense & Security Analysis, 20 (1), 2–19. The author discusses a set of military assets and strategies that he argues can be used effectively to prevent or halt genocide. He calls for US leadership in using these type of forces for genocide prevention missions and urges other countries to expand their military capabilities for this purpose.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank John Stanton Haddock for his research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Woocher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woocher, L. Peace Operations and the Prevention of Genocide. Hum Rights Rev 8, 307–318 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0016-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0016-4

Keywords

Navigation