Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting Industrial Unionism in Korea in the Wake of the 1997 Financial Crisis: Neoliberal Rhetoric, Bargaining (De)centralization and the State

  • Published:
East Asia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper revisits the rise of industrial unionism in Korea in the wake of the 1997 financial crisis at the turn of the twenty-first century. By closely investigating the reorganization of labour unionism in the context of neoliberalization, it challenges the alleged converging impact of neoliberal rhetoric or hegemony on industrial relations. To this end, this paper raises following substantive questions: How far did Korea’s industrial unionism advance under the new economic circumstances and how stable was it? More importantly, what were the fundamental factors behind such re-formation of labour unions? This paper finds that the transformation of labour unions in Korea is a mixture of the rise of industrial unionism and the persistence of enterprise unionism, that is to say a precarious progress of industrial unionism. It argues that behind the unstable development of industrial unionism in Korea were state-fostered legacy of power imbalance within labour in favour of enterprise unions, especially at chaebols, and continuing state intervention in the re-formation of labour unions in the neoliberal era. Finally, it argues that the seemingly sweeping neoliberal rhetoric or hegemony does not override the long-standing political-economic institutions of industrial relations and the leverage of the state, but it is filtered and reified by them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwala, R. (2012). The state and labor in transnational activism: The case of India. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(4): 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baccaro, L. & Howell, C. (2011). A common neoliberal trajectory: The transformation of industrial relations in advanced capitalism. Politics & Society 39(4): 521–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bechter, B. & Brandl, B. (2015). Developments in European industrial relations. In: European Commissions (ed) Industrial Relations in Europe 2014. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, pp 17–40.

  4. Broughton, A. & Welz, C. (2013). Impact of the crisis on industrial relations. Dublin: Eurofound.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, Y. (2009). Industrial workers, corporate employers and the government in South Korea. In: Chang. Y., Seok. H. and Baker. D. (eds) Korea Confronts Globalization. London: Routledge, pp.95–117.

  6. Cho, H. (2005). Industrial relations and militancy of labor union in large firms in South Korea. Korean Journal of Labor Studies 11(2): 229–260.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Choi, J. (1989). Labour and the Authoritarian State: Labour Unions in South Korean Manufacturing Industries, 1961–1980. Seoul: Korea University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedman, E. (2012). Getting through the hard times together? Chinese workers and unions respond to the economic crisis. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(4): 459–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, K. (2008). The global uprising of labour? The Korean labour movement and neoliberal social corporatism. Globalizations 5(3): 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hall, P. & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hue, I. (2007). The labor market flexibility and changes in labor law since 1987. Democracy and Law. 35: 81–111.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jang, G. (2009). The exclusion of non-regular workers in major enterprise unions. Journal of Memory and Future Vision 21: 213–341.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jeong, J. (2011). Can unions grow in authoritarian political and social environments? The Korean case. Journal of Industrial Relations 53(4): 504–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz, H. (1993). The decentralization of collective bargaining: A literature review and comparative analysis. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 47(1): 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keune, M. (2015). Shaping the future of industrial relations in the EU: Ideas, paradoxes and drivers of change. International Labour Review 154(1): 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. KCTU & FKTU (2013). Introduction of the Paid Time Off and the consequent changes in industrial relations. http://www.inochong.org/. Accessed 13 September 2018.

  18. Kim, D. and Kim, S. (2003). Globalization, financial crisis, and industrial relations: The case of South Korea. Industrial Relations 42(3): 341–367.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, J. (2000). Rethinking the new beginning of the democratic union movement in Korea: From the 1987 Great Workers’ Struggle to the construction of the Korean Trade Union Council (Chunnohyup) and the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU). Inter-asia Cultural Studies 1(3): 491–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koo, H. (2001). Korean Workers: The Culture and Politics of Class Formation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Korean Statistical Informational Service (a). Current organization status of labour unions. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=118&tblId=TX_11824_A000&connpath=I3. Accessed 5 November 2017. 

  22. Korean Statistical Informational Service (b). Current organization status of labour unions. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=118&tblId=TX_11824_A000_N001&conn_path=I3. Accessed 5 November 2017.

  23. Korean Statistical Informational Service (c). Current organization status of labour unions by organizational type and national umbrella union. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=118&tblId=TX_11824_A001&conn_path=I3. Accessed 7 November 2017.

  24. Korean Statistical Informational Service (d). Size and ratio of wageworkers by gender and employment type. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=101&tblId=DT_1DE7106&conn_path=I3. Accessed 7 November 2017.

  25. Lee, B. & Lansbury, R. (2012). Refining varieties of labour movements: Perspectives from the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(4): 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, B. & Yi, S. (2012). Organizational transformation towards industry unionism in South Korea. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(4): 476–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, J. (2011). Between fragmentation and centralization: South Korean industrial relations in transition. British Journal of Industrial Relations 49(4): 767–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, W. & Lee, J. (2004). Will the model of uncoordinated decentralization persist?: Changes in Korean industrial relations after the financial crisis. In: Katz. H., Lee. W. and Lee. J. (eds) The New Structure of Labor Relations: Tripartism and Decentralization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp.143–165.

  29. Marginson, P., Sisson, K. & Arrowsmith, J. (2003). Between decentralization and Europeanisation: Sectoral bargaining in four countries and two sectors. European Journal of Industrial Relations 9(2): 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mills, M., Blossfeld, H., Buchholz, S., Hofacker, D., Bernardi, F. & Hofmeister, H. (2008). Converging divergences? An international comparison of the impact of globalization on industrial relations and employment careers. International Sociology 23(4): 561–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Molina, O. (2005). Political exchange and bargaining reform in Italy and Spain. European Journal of Industrial Relations 11(1): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mueller, F. & Purcell, P. (1992). The Europeanization of manufacturing and the decentralization of bargaining: Multinational management strategies in the European automobile industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management 3(1): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Park, M. (2007). South Korean trade union movement at the crossroads: A critique of “social-movement” unionism. Critical Sociology 33(1–2): 311–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peetz, D. & Ollett, N. (2004). Union growth and reversal in newly industrialized countries: The case of South Korea and peripheral Workers. In: Harcourt. M. and Wood. G. (eds) Trade Unions and Democracy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp.211–240.

  35. Song, H. (2002). Labour unions in the Republic of Korea: Challenge and choice. In: Jose. A. (ed) Organized Labour in the 21 st Century. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, pp.199–237.

  36. Schulten, T & T. Müller (2013). A new European interventionism? The impact of the new European economic governance on wages and collective bargaining. In: Natali, D. and Vanhercke, B. (eds) Social developments in the European Union 2012. Brussels: ETUI, pp.181–213.

  37. Suh, D. (2003). Korean white-collar unions’ journey to labor solidarity: The historic path from enterprise to industrial unionism. In: Cornfield. D. and McCammon. H. (eds) Labor Revitalization: Global Perspectives and New Initiatives. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.153–180.

  38. Thelen, K. & Van Wijnbergen, C. (2003). The paradox of globalization: Labor relations in Germany and beyond. Comparative Political Studies 36(8): 859–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Traxler, F. (1995). Farewell to labour market associations? Organized versus disorganized decentralization as a map for industrial relations. In: Crouch. C. and Traxler. F. (eds) Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future? Aldershot: Avebury, pp.3–19.

  40. Traxler, F. (2003). Coordinated bargaining: A stocktaking of its preconditions, practices and performance. Industrial Relations Journal 34(3): 194–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wad, P. (2012). Revitalizing the Malaysian trade union movement: The case of the electronics industry. Journal of Industrial Relations 54(4): 494–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taekyoon Lim.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, T. Revisiting Industrial Unionism in Korea in the Wake of the 1997 Financial Crisis: Neoliberal Rhetoric, Bargaining (De)centralization and the State. East Asia 36, 167–184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-019-09313-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-019-09313-x

Keywords

Navigation